--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson wrote:
> >
> > Who is responsible for the city site? Is it the marketing company?
> If so they need to go. Who do they report to? It is the summer this
> is when peopl
yPark@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 8:40:55 PM
Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Thumbs DOWN on the city website
Why didn't they give YOU, a contract? You seem perfect for it!
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "oakdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> http://www
Why didn't they give YOU, a contract? You seem perfect for it!
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "oakdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://www.qscend.com/content/36/default.aspx
>
> They even have AP as a "featured" Muni client.
>
> While asburyboardwalk.com may not look so professional
Unfortunately I think the city relies too much on old or traditional
marketing efforts and not enough with newer ideas. You're right in
that when used correctly online marketing is not only powerful but
gives you more bang for your buck.
On May 30, 2007, at 3:17 PM, oakdorf wrote:
I c
I forgot the plug: http://www.asburyboardwalk.com
There's also a host of other cites with variations of the name that
have some content.
Off to the met game with my daughter.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*>
http://www.qscend.com/content/36/default.aspx
They even have AP as a "featured" Muni client.
While asburyboardwalk.com may not look so professional any more (I'm
getting older), I keep the current events fairly up to date.
All for free.
I thought UEZ money went to Jewell as did other funds for
I recall at some point that Asbury was seeking bids for a new developer to take
over the
website. I wish I had bid on it because it would've been done long ago.
I suspect that the new developer is having trouble getting things from the
city, or they
haven't paid the developer and he/she just st
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Who is responsible for the city site? Is it the marketing company?
If so they need to go. Who do they report to? It is the summer this
is when people are going to be looking for this information.
>
The city I ass
ps.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 12:28:39 PM
Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Thumbs DOWN on the city website
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, Allan Peterson wrote:
>
> Very sad to see the city website is still not fully functional. A
complete embarrassment. No cams (but does say one will be wo
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Very sad to see the city website is still not fully functional. A
complete embarrassment. No cams (but does say one will be working in
Feb). Visitors looking for information on events are out of luck
since many link
10 matches
Mail list logo
