Other than the 5th avenue pavillion all of the others have very little
architectural beauty. They are rectangular boxes and nothing like
what was there in old postcards. How about putting all of the
restoration effort and money into the bandshell and HoJo's and doing
it right. Knock the oth
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "oakdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> Here's something that could be done in less then a day:
> 1. remove the little booth for th 2nd ave mini golf. More work has
> been put into ssaving that then the 5th ave pavillion. Must be for
> some regulations. Sa
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "arhythmick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I har they are moving Confetti's into that little building to make
way
> for bigger and better things in the pavillion...
>
Smart move.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http:/
I har they are moving Confetti's into that little building to make way
for bigger and better things in the pavillion...
> Here's something that could be done in less then a day:
> 1. remove the little booth for th 2nd ave mini golf. More work has
> been put into ssaving that then the 5th ave pa
The pavillions:
Sunset: Werner wants the old style so it matches the berkley. The
replacement (current) was/is modern as well - it's missing the ramp
from the beach and walkway that was in front of it. It matched more
or less the design of the 5th Ave Pav.
5th: I'd lean to save the Hojo sectio
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "wernerapnj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Regarding the 5th Avenue pavilion (lets be clear on this - it is not
> the HoJo, HoJo was just the tenant. Refering to the HoJo as the
> building is what got us into a mess to begin with. The entire
> building is sig
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "wernerapnj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Exactly, combine the familiar/historic with the new/modern.
What's modern?
>
> There are 3 pavilion sites that are significant enough to restore,
> replicate.
Replicate? This is not Disney. If it's gone, it's gone.
> - Sunset Ave - originally built as PART of the BCHotel with a bridge
over Ocean Ave. (red brick, cast stone, 1924)
You'd have to assume the Berk would want that
Would you(anyone here) go to a:
a) starbucks
b) Dunkin Ds
c) no name/local
if it were located in one of the "replica" buildings?
You only get a chance to do this once in many years, why not
do it right?
A: Easy and cheaper to do it wrong, but right economically.
There's only so much they can do with a big rectangle that SHOULD have
to go on the same footprintof the existing. SHOULD.
For now, I'm pretty impressed wit
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it be great if they could go thru the many archives of
old boardwalk photos, and
> try to recreate that look? That would get my support in a
heartbeat.
>
==
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I will go with that far, that we do not need kitschy design
elements
> like faux stone appliqués, however, consider your statement.
HoJo's
> was completely different from what was on the bw when it was
built. It
> was
Wouldn't it be great if they could go thru the many archives of old boardwalk
photos, and
try to recreate that look? That would get my support in a heartbeat.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "wernerapnj" wrote:
> >
In a message dated 10/15/2007 10:28:48 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am surprised more people have not commented on this very AP relevant
article and topic. Seems to be a very positive statement for efforts
to accelerate what most on this board seem to be pushi
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "wernerapnj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It is a re-modeling, not a restoration as the plan dictates.
> Including applied stoneface, just like a Middletown McMansion.
>
> Here is one remaining authentic, significant piece of 1960s
> architecture that they
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "nobepeymay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> based on the strong statements in the article I assume they have
> patched up any differnces with Asbury Partners? It seems as if
the
> local officials are excited about the stratagy based on comments
> made in the
based on the strong statements in the article I assume they have
patched up any differnces with Asbury Partners? It seems as if the
local officials are excited about the stratagy based on comments
made in the article?
never 100% clear!
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <[EMAIL PROTE
I meant here.
I did not look at story chat.but just did and noticed no
comments either! That's probably a good thing though as the
comments I have seen on Story Chat have been mostly negative
regarding AP development and AP in general!
John
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hing
Do you mean here, or on the APP website?
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "nobepeymay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am surprised more people have not commented on this very AP relevant
> article and topic. Seems to be a very positive statement for efforts
> to accelerate what most on this
I am surprised more people have not commented on this very AP relevant
article and topic. Seems to be a very positive statement for efforts
to accelerate what most on this board seem to be pushing
for.entertainment/recreation/dining.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL P
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "oakdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> see the sunday press.
>
Well, the finally seem to be listening to what has been said here for
the past few years. Not on pavilion at a time, but the whole thing.
Build the bw first before the residential. I won't take cr
20 matches
Mail list logo
