a Linux machine instead.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List On Behalf
Of Ian Worthington
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 11:16 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/Architecture Principles of Operation pdf
Have you considered running a zPDT system, or get
;re someone that can install
z/OS on an LPAR, but you're going to put it on a Linux machine instead.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List On Behalf
Of Ian Worthington
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 11:16 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/Archit
Is there a URL for an index page?
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List on behalf
of Peter Relson
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 8:39 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/Architecture Principles of Operation pdf
I don't know if thi
I don't know if this was responded to or not, but the following is likely
true, but not overly important, because it's not the "expected" way
It can be obtained by going through
https://www-01.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink, however, this requires
an IBM Resourcelink user ID and the pub seems to be
I somewhat agree that z/Architecture is not "a feature of z/OS",
however, access to Principles of Operation is mandatory in order to
to write (or even study) assembler code. Numerous other z/OS pubs
make many references to Principles of Operation. For example, the
statements shown below extracte
: Monday, November 15, 2021 2:51 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/Architecture Principles of Operation pdf
How does one get a resource link id? I contracting at a larger software house
(not an employee, try to get a full time position in your early 60’s). I’m
there because I have
How does one get a resource link id? I contracting at a larger software house
(not an employee, try to get a full time position in your early 60’s). I’m
there because I have done assembler for 40 years. Guess I’ll have to stay at
the z14 level for a while
Laddie Hanus
Sent from whatever d
[0c9b78d54aea-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 12:15 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/Architecture Principles of Operation pdf
Have you considered running a zPDT system, or getting a cloud system just for
that? That's got to be cheaper than sy
[ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] on behalf
of Ian Worthington [0c9b78d54aea-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 10:38 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/Architecture Principles of Operation pdf
I loved bookmaster back in the day (though the
ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/Architecture Principles of Operation pdf
On Nov 15, 2021, at 08:38:32, Ian Worthington wrote:
>
> I loved bookmaster back in the day (though the script underpinnings, not so
> much), never really found an adequate tool to replace it. Tried
Thanks, Paul.
XSL-FO, or something very similar, then, by the look of it?
I had a brief liaison with the XML-based tDocBook some years ago which
initially looked promising and then proved to be more effort than I really
wanted in a bookie replacement.
Best wishes,
Ian ...
On Monday, Novem
EDU
Subject: Re: z/Architecture Principles of Operation pdf
On Nov 15, 2021, at 08:38:32, Ian Worthington wrote:
>
> I loved bookmaster back in the day (though the script underpinnings, not so
> much), never really found an adequate tool to replace it. Tried lyx for a
> bit and was final
On Nov 15, 2021, at 08:38:32, Ian Worthington wrote:
>
> I loved bookmaster back in the day (though the script underpinnings, not so
> much), never really found an adequate tool to replace it. Tried lyx for a
> bit and was finally persuaded to use latex, but it's still not as productive
> as b
dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2021 6:02 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/Architecture Principles of Operation pdf
On Nov 14, 2021, at 14:52:12, Charles Mills wrote:
>
> Well, not sure it's sensible but "z Architecture" is not a "
A.EDU
Subject: Re: z/Architecture Principles of Operation pdf
On Nov 14, 2021, at 14:52:12, Charles Mills wrote:
>
> Well, not sure it's sensible but "z Architecture" is not a "feature of z/OS."
>
Yes, but still a hyperlink would be useful.
> Yes, yes, of course
Ref: Your note of Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:02:43 -0700
gil writes:
> Even less sensible is that SuperC comes with either ISPF or HLASM TK
> with separate manuals. The M&C differ largely in messages prefixes
> and degree of obsolescence. When I suggested in these lists that
> SuperC be made a single
On Nov 14, 2021, at 14:52:12, Charles Mills wrote:
>
> Well, not sure it's sensible but "z Architecture" is not a "feature of z/OS."
>
Yes, but still a hyperlink would be useful.
> Yes, yes, of course, not very sensible. z/OS only runs on one type of
> hardware, and any assembler developer int
Well, not sure it's sensible but "z Architecture" is not a "feature of z/OS."
Yes, yes, of course, not very sensible. z/OS only runs on one type of hardware,
and any assembler developer interested in z/OS is interested in how the
hardware works.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Ma
18 matches
Mail list logo
