I have 20+ AC adapters for Cisco 79xx phones that are brand new, in
boxes. These were purchased for use with our 7940G phones, but I never
used them. As I understand, they don't work with the 7970 or 7971
phones.
They are from VOIPSupply, they are not Cisco brand, but we have had
two dozen
On Oct 22, 2006, at 5:43 AM, Ivan Fetch wrote:
Hello,
I'm going to develop some Nagios (http://www.nagios.org) plugins
for
monitoring production Asterisk installations, and I'd like for the
plugins
to be as useful to others as possible. I've taken a look at the
"Monitoring Asterisk" vo
rge.) Now, whether
open sourcing YOUR business plan is a good idea for you is another
question entirely!
Tom
Tom Rymes
Cascade Link Systems
www.cascadelinksystems.com
(603) 375-1414
"Intelligent technology solutions for small businesses."
who want a solution that "just works", not those who want
to dig in and really learn the nuts and bolts of dialplan logic.
Once you have done that, you ought to have a decent idea of how to
work with dialplans.
Tom
--------
Tom Rymes
Cascade Li
On Dec 2, 2005, at 12:44 PM, Alvaro Parres wrote:(ENGLISH VERSION AT THE END) Hola lista: Requiero saber si alguien tiene un cliente o empresa donde se encuentren montado algun Asterisk como PBX de tamaño mediano (al menos unas 50 extensiones). Esto para dar una demostracion a un cliente
y VOIP provider in the event that your primary provider has
an outage.
------
Tom Rymes
Cascade Link Systems
www.cascadelinksystems.com
(603) 375-1414
Technology solutions for small and medium s
On Nov 11, 2005, at 11:33 AM, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
Cory Andrews wrote:
I'll get right on that in my 1.5 hours of spare time per day,
previously devoted to sleepseriously, looking for something
relatively "shrink wrapped" that we can resell.
No canned solution is going to suit your n
On Nov 1, 2005, at 9:56 PM, Greg Boehnlein wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Tom Rymes wrote:
[Deleted]
You should take another look at the time saver. Since that is
what it
really is.
Or I could just buy a commercial product that provides the same
features
and saves even more time. ;)
And
On Nov 1, 2005, at 10:02 PM, Greg Boehnlein wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Tom Rymes wrote:
Now.. would you like to argue the fact that more packages == more
security
holes? Think of it this way: PBXware and Astlinux can coexist in
about 45
megabytes of storage, running out of a Compact Flash and
On Nov 1, 2005, at 4:30 PM, Greg Boehnlein wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Paul wrote:
Now.. would you like to argue the fact that more packages == more
security
holes? Think of it this way: PBXware and Astlinux can coexist in
about 45
megabytes of storage, running out of a Compact Flash and can
On Nov 1, 2005, at 12:15 PM, Greg Boehnlein wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Paul wrote:
[Deleted]
You should take another look at the time saver. Since that is
what it
really is.
Or I could just buy a commercial product that provides the same
features
and saves even more time. ;)
And cos
On Nov 1, 2005, at 11:54 AM, Kevin Hanson wrote:
You do not deal with [EMAIL PROTECTED] limitations, but rather the AMP system.
I do not
find AMP limiting, and if you look at the configuration files
there is a way
to override every customization installed by AMP.
There are two things t
On Nov 1, 2005, at 12:35 PM, Greg Boehnlein wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Tom Rymes wrote:
[Deleted]
Now, if you are the type of person who wants unlimited control over
asterisk, then you shouldn't use AMP/[EMAIL PROTECTED], because the GUI
necessarily
places limits on the lev
On Oct 31, 2005, at 9:07 PM, Greg Boehnlein wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Tom Rymes wrote:
What problems? Which version? It works very, very well for me.
As long as you need to do things the way that [EMAIL PROTECTED] has decided is
the
"correct" way to do things. If you need to st
What problems? Which version? It works very, very well for me.
Tom
On Oct 31, 2005, at 5:02 PM, Greg Boehnlein wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Tom Rymes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], IMNSHO is definitely the way to go for a Small office
with 35 users. Which version of [EMAIL PROTECTED] had the bug
[EMAIL PROTECTED], IMNSHO is definitely the way to go for a Small office
with 35 users. Which version of [EMAIL PROTECTED] had the bug you are talking about
(which has been fixed, as mentioned...)??
Tom
On Oct 31, 2005, at 11:52 AM, Jason Becker wrote:
The (Asterisk) bug relevant to this i
Moreover, OpenPBX still works with Digium hardware, so you are free
to support Digium by buying their hardware and using OpenPBX.
I sincerely hope that this turns into one of those forks that ends up
making both projects better, and even that they end up merging again
at some point.
Tom
cuse I didn't know) but will soon will. Regards, smbPBXOn 10/14/05, Tom Rymes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm sure that you could use a Snom or Cisco set with a sidecar on it.However, most people seem to say that the biggest problem with hotelsis the interface to their billing so
On Oct 15, 2005, at 8:48 AM, Paul wrote:
Does anyone know of a user manual geared to the Cisco 7960g phones?
No, but if you find one let me know!
[snip]
First there is the transfer. Both the pound key (#) as well as the
phones
BlndXfr key work well for blind transfers. I have not noticed
I'm sure that you could use a Snom or Cisco set with a sidecar on it.
However, most people seem to say that the biggest problem with hotels
is the interface to their billing software, which is difficult at
best to make fly with asterisk at this point.
Does the customer know that it will not
If you want cheaper, try eBay for the Rhino.
As far if it will work, I can't see why not!
Tom
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Jean-Michel Hiver
> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 12:57 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Comm
Brent,
You should ask whoever quoted this (Verizon, I assume) if they will
give you a kiss once the circuit is installed!! ("You're going to
feel a little pressure...")
We use Paetec for our incoming circuit. We just upgraded to a PRI,
and our monthly pricing is definitely under $400/Mont
Couldn't you accomplish this by having asterisk prefix the caller-id
name with the information you want?
Set(CIDNAME
Then just use one of the existing operator panels such as FOP or
IPSwitchboard.
Then you can take the $800 and donate it to FOP or IPSwitchboard.
Tom
On Aug 25, 2005, at
They exist but are exceedingly rare (hence the "for some unfathomable
reason" in my original post!)
On Aug 18, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Rob Lith wrote:
You have BRI in the US!? ;) - seriously though I thought it was main
EU and ZA where we have quite a bit of BRI's.
Rob
On 8/1
On Aug 18, 2005, at 3:28 AM, Rob Lith wrote:
The only instance you'll get classis 'echo' is when calling from you
ISDN to an analogue line on the far end.
Doesn't that describe at least 80% of phone calls? I know that here
in the US 99.99% of our customers have POTS analog telephone lines.
Jimmy,
This is the commercial list. VOIPSupply's posts would be out of line
on the users list, but they are fine here.
Frankly, I was happy to hear that they have updated their online
store to allow for volume discounts. Even if that's a "Welcome to
2005" addition.
Tom
On Aug 17, 2005,
Just as a counterpoint, I have always been very happy with VoipJet.
Tom
On Aug 11, 2005, at 9:56 AM, Sean Hogston wrote:
Well I guess to offer prices as low as they do you have to cut costs
somewhere and apparently it is in their support department :)
Sean
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 23:56 -0400,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 7:05 PM
> To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] Asterisk Conusultant
>
> Tom Rymes wr
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 5:19 PM
> To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] Asterisk Conusultant
>
>
> Andrew Latham wrote:
>
> >Please move c
Doh!
Sorry about sending that to the list
Tom
On Aug 4, 2005, at 4:24 PM, Tom Rymes wrote:
Parl,
I would be happy to configure your system for your needs. Please
let me know what your needs are and I will be happy to speak with
you to come up with the best solution.
Tom
On Aug 4
Parl,
I would be happy to configure your system for your needs. Please let
me know what your needs are and I will be happy to speak with you to
come up with the best solution.
Tom
On Aug 4, 2005, at 11:11 AM, Parl wrote:
Someone to remote in and "program" our [EMAIL PROTECTED] PBX at wo
On Jul 21, 2005, at 4:41 PM, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 13:14 -0700, Rusty Shackleford wrote:
Nope, Verisign. Rather surprised me too, as I've never thought of
them
as a telecom company.
As Jed mentioned, they're hawking it here: http://tinyurl.com/5l25y
32 matches
Mail list logo
