Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications

2008-09-21 Thread Geoff Love
lex >> Balashov >> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:18 AM >> To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion >> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications >> >> It strongly depends on the company, but in *general*, inside salespeople >>

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications

2008-09-20 Thread Alex Balashov
I will second that motion. John van Oppen wrote: > Why not just keep it all as SIP and get a T1 with an ISP who will > support QOS for you? -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications

2008-09-20 Thread John van Oppen
, 2008 11:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications Even LA has tons of Data centers and loop charges are different for each data center. Your cost depends on how many rate center you cover. if you want to

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications

2008-09-20 Thread Jai Rangi
Even LA has tons of Data centers and loop charges are different for each data center. Your cost depends on how many rate center you cover. if you want to cover only one rate center then the price wont be bad, but when you start adding different rate centers then XO can turn out to be really expensi

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications

2008-09-20 Thread Trixter aka Bret McDanel
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 14:51 -0300, roberto wrote: > Sorry, > > We are in los angeles area. Well I think xo is in the wilshire data center there. But only if you are going to host the box there, otherwise you will have to get a circuit run to wherever. > > Then you get the serv

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications

2008-09-20 Thread roberto
Sorry, We are in los angeles area. thanks On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Trixter aka Bret McDanel < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 13:55 -0300, roberto wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have a litle question, we are mainly operating with voip and > > asterisk, but i'm very concer

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications

2008-09-20 Thread Trixter aka Bret McDanel
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 13:55 -0300, roberto wrote: > Hello, > > I have a litle question, we are mainly operating with voip and > asterisk, but i'm very concerned specially about the quality, i think > it will be better to have T1 for termination and origination my calls, > well the question is, how

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications

2008-09-20 Thread roberto
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex > Balashov > Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:18 AM > To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications > > It strongly depends on the company, but in *general*, inside salespeople &g

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications

2008-09-14 Thread John van Oppen
Networks LLC 206.973.8302 (Direct) 206.973.8300 (main office) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:18 AM To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] XO

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications is pathetic

2008-09-09 Thread Alex Balashov
> > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] On Behalf Of Andrew > Latham > > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 4:38

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications may be pathetic, but Telekenex defiantely is!

2008-09-09 Thread Steve Totaro
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Kristian Kielhofner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Brad Belton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Correction: >> >> Michael Kasper and the company Telekenex he works for should be avoided and >> ignored. What a Class A Putz! >> >> >> >> >> B

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications may be pathetic, but Telekenex defiantely is!

2008-09-09 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Brad Belton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Correction: > > Michael Kasper and the company Telekenex he works for should be avoided and > ignored. What a Class A Putz! > > > > > Brad > Thanks for the correction. I wouldn't want the archives to think I was a "putz". ;

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications may be pathetic, but Telekenex defiantely is!

2008-09-09 Thread Brad Belton
erisk Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications may be pathetic, but Telekenex defiantely is! Ouch! Busted! I agree that those that hide behind gmail accounts (or the like) are nut-less clowns. I never offer assistance or listen to people that don't have the balls to stand

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications may be pathetic, but Telekenex defiantely is!

2008-09-09 Thread Brad Belton
hat a Class A Putz! Best, Brad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristian Kielhofner Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:58 PM To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications is patheti

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications

2008-09-09 Thread Steve Totaro
Well my broker is vendor agnostic and gets his clients the best deals to fit their needs. He deals directly with the inside salespeople on a regular (daily) basis. Because he steers so much business, I have yet to get a quote directly from the telco that beat one of his quotes. If he cannot beat

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications is pathetic

2008-09-09 Thread Hickerson, Cary
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bret Peterson Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:53 PM To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications is pathetic I agree and concur!!! I mean, I now feel completely informed on my choices now and am

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications is pathetic

2008-09-09 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Michael Kaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You should try www.telekenex.com, far superior to xo. > Wow... Other than the obvious I'd like to point out that in a message on July 23 you included a link to this company in your signature: http://www.mail-archive.com/

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications is pathetic

2008-09-09 Thread Bret Peterson
PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew > Latham > > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 4:38 AM > > To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion > > Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications > > > > Thank you well said I

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications is pathetic

2008-09-09 Thread Bret Peterson
ekenex.com, far superior to xo. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Latham > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 4:38 AM > To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-b

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications is pathetic

2008-09-09 Thread SIP
r 09, 2008 4:38 AM > To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications > > Thank you well said If my contact list could talk. :P > > I enjoy great quotes from many companies. I was really happy to > stumble on http://www

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications

2008-09-09 Thread VIP Carrier
Stay a way from XO On 9/9/08, Andrew Latham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you well said If my contact list could talk. :P > > I enjoy great quotes from many companies. I was really happy to > stumble on http://www.paetec.com/ one day. That was an affordable T3. > > > On Mon, Sep 8

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications is pathetic

2008-09-09 Thread Michael Kaspar
You should try www.telekenex.com, far superior to xo. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Latham Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 4:38 AM To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] XO

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications

2008-09-09 Thread Andrew Latham
Thank you well said If my contact list could talk. :P I enjoy great quotes from many companies. I was really happy to stumble on http://www.paetec.com/ one day. That was an affordable T3. On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Alex Balashov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It strongly depends o

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications

2008-09-08 Thread Alex Balashov
It strongly depends on the company, but in *general*, inside salespeople are in a better position to make you killer deals than agents. Steve Totaro wrote: > Or go through my broker and get some kickback and multiple quotes from > the various vendors. XO is one of my favorites BTW. > > Thanks,

[asterisk-biz] XO Communications

2008-09-08 Thread Hickerson, Cary
But if you prefer to work directly with source please contact me. I also pay a finders fee for business that closes... XO Communications Cary Hickerson Senior Account Executive 1660 Lincoln Street Suite 2600 Denver, CO 80264 Direct 303.539.1227 Fax 303.539.2708 Cell 303.359.9326 Customer Care 866

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications

2008-09-08 Thread Geoff Love
Who do you use for a broker? On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Steve Totaro < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or go through my broker and get some kickback and multiple quotes from > the various vendors. XO is one of my favorites BTW. > > Thanks, > Steve Totaro > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Hic

Re: [asterisk-biz] XO Communications

2008-09-08 Thread Steve Totaro
Or go through my broker and get some kickback and multiple quotes from the various vendors. XO is one of my favorites BTW. Thanks, Steve Totaro On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Hickerson, Cary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I work with XO Communications. Please contact me if you need pricing for >

[asterisk-biz] XO Communications

2008-09-08 Thread Hickerson, Cary
I work with XO Communications. Please contact me if you need pricing for MPLS, Collo, PRI, DIA, Ethernet, Hosted IVR and Dynamic T-1. I work in 75 Markets throughout the US. XO Communications Cary Hickerson Senior Account Executive 1660 Lincoln Street Suite 2600 Denver, CO 80264 Direct 303.539.1