Brian West wrote:
Isn't it really 1000 interrupts ? not 8000?
Yes, that is correct. Each Zaptel card generates 1000 interrupts per
second. For a TDM400 card, there are four B-channels transferred during
that interrupt cycle. For a TE110P card, there are 24/30 channels
transferred during that cyc
Isn't it really 1000 interrupts ? not 8000?
/b
On Apr 28, 2005, at 8:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Brian West wrote:
WHERE in the hell do you come up with those numbers.. It only has to
clock ONCE.. not 28 times.
Yes, it really has to only clock once. But the way the zaptel
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Brian West wrote:
> WHERE in the hell do you come up with those numbers.. It only has to
> clock ONCE.. not 28 times.
Yes, it really has to only clock once. But the way the zaptel drivers work
right now, it is 8000 interrupts *per span*. I would hope the DS3000
drivers would
Max TNT's are pretty cheap they'll need to price it accordingly.
I'm somewhat concerned that the CPU requirements necessary to put the
Digium DS3 card to use will be insane. First of all, if the interrupt
model remains the same, it'd need to handle 28*8000 irq/s - 224k
ints/sec,
which by its
>> $7-8k would be a good number, depending on what they slap on the boards.
>
>> For $8k you can do G.729 to TDM for a full DS-3 and never look at an
>> Asterisk solution.
>
>Just the g.729 licenses @$10 ea for 644 channels would be $6,440.
Well, last I checked, G.729 was about $1.5 or so a chann
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 17:42 -0700, Matt Klein wrote:
> $7-8k would be a good number, depending on what they slap on the boards.
> For $8k you can do G.729 to TDM for a full DS-3 and never look at an
> Asterisk solution.
Just the g.729 licenses @$10 ea for 644 channels would be $6,440.
regards,
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Matt Klein wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=11186&item=5770482149&rd=1
$7-8k would be a good number, depending on what they slap on the boards.
Don't forget you'll need lots of CPU, so comparing apples to
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Matt Klein wrote:
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=11186&item=5770482149&rd=1
>
> $7-8k would be a good number, depending on what they slap on the boards.
Don't forget you'll need lots of CPU, so comparing apples to apples, if
digium card costs 7k,
On top of that, as long as Mark's listening, I'd look at throwing out a
CompactPCI version of the new cards.
-m
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Matt Klein wrote:
Max TNT's are pretty cheap they'll need to price it accordingly.
I'm somewhat concerned that the
Well, I know that channelization is supposed to be done on that card,
but I'm concerned, too. Which also, keep in mind, that should reduce
interrupts.
It's mentioned also that they are not putting DSP's on the card, which I
think is a big mistake.
Maybe they'll come out with multiple DSP cards
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Matt Klein wrote:
>
> Max TNT's are pretty cheap they'll need to price it accordingly.
I'm somewhat concerned that the CPU requirements necessary to put the
Digium DS3 card to use will be insane. First of all, if the interrupt
model remains the same, it'd need to handle
11 matches
Mail list logo
