I'd be interested in the patch as well
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 13:51, Bill Hamel wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> This sounds what I am looking for, many thanks !
>
> Also, I do not see an attachment, the patch that is :)
>
> I dont know if the list strips attachments, perhaps send it to my email address
>
Nope, I'm an idiot. Here's the patch :P
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Bill Hamel waxed:
> Hi Chris,
>
> This sounds what I am looking for, many thanks !
>
> Also, I do not see an attachment, the patch that is :)
>
> I dont know if the list strips attachments, perhaps send it to my email address
> [EMA
Hi Chris,
This sounds what I am looking for, many thanks !
Also, I do not see an attachment, the patch that is :)
I dont know if the list strips attachments, perhaps send it to my email address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks again,
-bh
Quoting "C. Maj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I attached a patch I've
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Bill Hamel waxed:
> Hi,
>
> Looking around I can't seem to find a way to show the number of agents currently
> logged into a queue and if possible who they are. Is there a way to do this ?
>
> Thanks
> -b
I attached a patch I've been using to show the # of agents
(members)
Hi,
Looking around I can't seem to find a way to show the number of agents currently
logged into a queue and if possible who they are. Is there a way to do this ?
Thanks
-b
--
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messag
