ing varies in different countries and providers.
> You need to contact you provider for it.
>
> *From:* Roi Stork
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 10, 2011 9:49 AM
> *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
> Discussion
> *Subject:* [asterisk-users] zaptel/dahdi sett
The settings you are asking varies in different countries and providers. You
need to contact you provider for it.
From: Roi Stork
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 9:49 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] zaptel/dahdi settings for singtel E1
Anyone here who has configured zaptel/dahdi for a singtel E1 line?
What are the settings for coding, framing, line type and switchtype?
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Joi
Hi
I've been running into a weird issue, which its hard to get any information
on. We successfully setup a R710 system with Asterisk 1.4.22 / libpri 1.4.7,
utilizing a Digium TE121B Pci express card. However we are having some
stability issues and can't seem to trace it down to if it is a card/sys
Dave Fullerton wrote:
> I guess I just found a bug then, because the card above is a TE220B.
> Here's a portion of the dmesg output:
You are correct sir; I wrote the code that was supposed to report the
VPM presence via dahdi_scan, but clearly did not test it properly
because it didn't work :-(
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Dave Fullerton wrote:
>
>>> The dahdi_scan tool will tell you whether hardware echocans are present
>>> or not, among other methods.
>>>
>> I tried that, but I didn't see anything that specified whether the echo
>> canceller was present. Here's the output, can you tell m
Dave Fullerton wrote:
>> The dahdi_scan tool will tell you whether hardware echocans are present
>> or not, among other methods.
>>
>
> I tried that, but I didn't see anything that specified whether the echo
> canceller was present. Here's the output, can you tell me what I should
> be looking
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Dave Fullerton wrote:
>
>> It is true that this method would require more configuration work and
>> that it would probably throw people off who were used to the old method.
>> However, I don't agree that it leaves more room for error. The current
>> system, IMHO, has a
Dave Fullerton wrote:
> It is true that this method would require more configuration work and
> that it would probably throw people off who were used to the old method.
> However, I don't agree that it leaves more room for error. The current
> system, IMHO, has a certain amount of ambiguity to
Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Dave Fullerton wrote:
>
>> Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:00:55AM -0400, Dave Fullerton wrote:
>>>
Here's my $0.02. If you don't want an echo canceller, specify
echocanceller=none,x-y and have dahdi_cfg print a warning (
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Dave Fullerton wrote:
> Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:00:55AM -0400, Dave Fullerton wrote:
>>
>>> Here's my $0.02. If you don't want an echo canceller, specify
>>> echocanceller=none,x-y and have dahdi_cfg print a warning (at any
>>> verbosity level) when
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:00:55AM -0400, Dave Fullerton wrote:
>
>> Here's my $0.02. If you don't want an echo canceller, specify
>> echocanceller=none,x-y and have dahdi_cfg print a warning (at any
>> verbosity level) when an echo canceller is not specified for a channel
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:00:55AM -0400, Dave Fullerton wrote:
> Here's my $0.02. If you don't want an echo canceller, specify
> echocanceller=none,x-y and have dahdi_cfg print a warning (at any
> verbosity level) when an echo canceller is not specified for a channel.
> Personally, I would also
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:00:55AM -0400, Dave Fullerton wrote:
> Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> > Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
> >> On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >>
[snip]
>
> Here's my $0.02. If you don't want an echo canceller, specify
> echocanceller=none,x-y and hav
Dave Fullerton wrote:
> Here's my $0.02. If you don't want an echo canceller, specify
> echocanceller=none,x-y and have dahdi_cfg print a warning (at any
> verbosity level) when an echo canceller is not specified for a channel.
> Personally, I would also like to see an option that says "Use the
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
Note: It is *mandatory* to configure an echo canceler for the
system's channels using dahdi_cfg unless the interface cards in use
have echo canceler modules availab
Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>> Note: It is *mandatory* to configure an echo canceler for the
>>> system's channels using dahdi_cfg unless the interface cards in use
>>> have echo canceler modules available and enabled. There is *no*
>
hi,
try something like this:
bchan=4-5
hardhdlc=6
echocanceller=mg2,4-5
and then it should look like:
Asterisk-1:~# dahdi_cfg -v
DAHDI Tools Version - SVN-trunk-r6902
DAHDI Version: SVN-trunk-r6946
Echo Canceller(s): MG2
Configuration
==
SPAN 1: CCS/ AMI Build-out: 0 db (C
Hi
2009/8/18 Tzafrir Cohen :
> Something is missing here...
>
> http://docs.tzafrir.org.il/dahdi-tools/#_echo_canceller_modules
Thanks ..
I added to /etc/dahdi/system.conf the following:
echocanceller=mg2,1-10
However, I have no clue about the various echo canceller, between mg2,
kb1, sec2, and
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
[snip]
>> Note: It is *mandatory* to configure an echo canceler for the
>> system's channels using dahdi_cfg unless the interface cards in use
>> have echo canceler modules available and enabled. There is *no*
>> default software echo canceler
Hi
That was a fast answer, impressive !
2009/8/18 Kevin P. Fleming :
>
> Did you read the upgrade documentation that comes with DAHDI,
> specifically from UPGRADE.txt:
I did, but I guess I did not pay enough attention...
>
>> * It is no longer possible to select a software echo canceler at
>>
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:50:25PM +1000, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have upgraded our asterisk box from zaptel to dhadi two weeks ago...
>
> Since, there has been quite a significant amount of echo when making a
> call. Only for the local outgoing call, the person on the other side
>
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> From reading the various documentation, I was convinced that moving
> from zaptel to dahdi was almost just a matter of renaming the
> configuration file... Am I mistaken ?
Did you read the upgrade documentation that comes with DAHDI,
specifically from UPGRADE.txt:
> *
Hello
I have upgraded our asterisk box from zaptel to dhadi two weeks ago...
Since, there has been quite a significant amount of echo when making a
call. Only for the local outgoing call, the person on the other side
doesn't hear any echo.
This is with a TE-110P ISDN PRI card ..
I've pretty muc
>>> On 1/24/2009 at 4:20 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 02:30:24PM -0500, j...@j4computers.com wrote:
>> Is Zaptel no longer available?
>
> Aparantly no longer linked from asterisk.org . Still very much available
> from http://downloads.digium.com/pub/zaptel/ as before.
>
Th
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 02:30:24PM -0500, j...@j4computers.com wrote:
> Is Zaptel no longer available?
Aparantly no longer linked from asterisk.org . Still very much available
from http://downloads.digium.com/pub/zaptel/ as before.
>
> I returned to a long shelved project (using TDM400P and a cu
Is Zaptel no longer available?
I returned to a long shelved project (using TDM400P and a customized, canned
version of *) and, getting to the configuration, find wctdm is not there. I
recall the authors where very "enterprise" oriented and focused on T1 cards.
So they left analog support out.
Is there an install script or step-by-step instruction somewhere on
whaty is needed to migrate from zaptel to dahdi?
I read the document that digium published which nicely states some of
the differences between zaptel and dahdi but i was looking more for
something like step-by-step instructions.
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 03:23:52PM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
>> Let me know if I should post this on the asterisk-dev list instead.
>>
>> I am building a Linux-Vserver (http://www.linux-vserver.org) host system
>> that will have several guests running Asterisk. Sin
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 03:23:52PM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
> Let me know if I should post this on the asterisk-dev list instead.
>
> I am building a Linux-Vserver (http://www.linux-vserver.org) host system
> that will have several guests running Asterisk. Since the guests can't
> loa
Let me know if I should post this on the asterisk-dev list instead.
I am building a Linux-Vserver (http://www.linux-vserver.org) host system
that will have several guests running Asterisk. Since the guests can't
load kernel modules or do other dangerous stuff, but can access them I
built zapte
31 matches
Mail list logo
