On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 16:02 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 08:38 -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:49:34AM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > How this patch?
> >
> > Looks fine to me. Some nitpicking below but feel free to add my
> >
> > Acked-by:
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 08:38 -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:49:34AM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > How this patch?
>
> Looks fine to me. Some nitpicking below but feel free to add my
>
> Acked-by: Bob Copeland
>
> to this or a later version.
>
> > Signed-off-by:
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:49:34AM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> How this patch?
Looks fine to me. Some nitpicking below but feel free to add my
Acked-by: Bob Copeland
to this or a later version.
> Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky
I believe maintainin
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 17:11 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 09:59 -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Maxim Levitsky
> > wrote:
> > >> Patch I made uses GPL code from e1000e, but since ath5k is
> > >> dual-licensed so patch can't be accepted. So
