On Tuesday 25 November 2014 11:19:48 Milos Ivanovic wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Please, I need a help about installation Atheros AR9220 on Linux Debian with
> kernel 3.2.
>
> Can you help me about this issue ? Because I have tried in several ways to
> do this but without success.
>
> Thank you in adv
I have a link using a system running linux 3.13 which has a wireless
card which lspci describes as:-
Qualcomm Atheros AR5413/AR5414 Wireless Network Adapter [AR5006X(S) 802.11abg]
(rev 01)
Both ends of the link are the same. The link is 3.5km long, and over a
slightly difficult topology, so the
On Wednesday 30 Oct 2013, Beat Meier wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have a lot of wireless repeaters which uses madwifi. Because of
> several problem like not anymore supported and
> other problems like "no xmit buf" I need to upgrade to mac80211 with ath5k.
> What I notice is that in the b band the ath5k d
On Sunday 30 Oct 2011, Lukáš Turek wrote:
> On Friday 28 October 2011 12:43:54 David Goodenough wrote:
> > Did this patch ever make it into the mainline kernel. I ask because
> > I am getting an OOPS on 3.0 when I try to set the distance. Looking
> > at the github source it
On Tuesday 15 Mar 2011, Lukáš Turek wrote:
> On Sunday 13 March 2011 23:01:33 Steve Brown wrote:
> > It seems possible to slip in a set coverage class before
> > ath5k_hw_init_core_clock has been called. The openwrt
> > script /lib/wifi/mac80211.sh does it reliably. Sometimes I get "rmmod
> > ath5k
On Wednesday 17 November 2010, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:22 AM, David Goodenough
>
> wrote:
> > I have a board with an atheros wireless card, driven by ath5k. The
> > driver is from compat wireless as supplied by openwrt trunk with a
> > 2.6
I have a board with an atheros wireless card, driven by ath5k. The driver
is from compat wireless as supplied by openwrt trunk with a 2.6.32 kernel.
There is a local access point which I know is OK as I am listening to the
radio over it (using IPlayer) on a laptop nearby and there is no interrupt
I have recently noticed mention of ath9k, but on the madwifi home page
there is only mention of ath5k. Even a search of the madwifi wiki brings
up no hits.
I presume it is an evolution of ath5k, or was it found that atheros had
produces a new generation of chips that required a rewrite?
David
__
