On 5/30/09, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 00:33 +0200, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
>
>> > Could you try to work against v11
>> > of my rfkill patch, or better even against the cfg80211 rfkill instead?
>> I didn't look at both of them yet. However I think we first should try to
>> get
>>
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 00:33 +0200, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> > Could you try to work against v11
> > of my rfkill patch, or better even against the cfg80211 rfkill instead?
> I didn't look at both of them yet. However I think we first should try to get
> current rfkill support into mainline as fas
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 26. Mai 2009 01:32:46 schrieb Johannes Berg:
> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 01:24 +0200, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> > + err = rfkill_register(sc->rf_kill.rfkill);
> > + if (err) {
> > + sc->rf_kill.rfkill = NULL;
> > + return -1;
> > + }
>
> Mi
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2009 22:29:42 schrieb Bob Copeland:
> I'm definitely interested in seeing rfkill gpio support getting in,
> it's overdue. So I say repost it and we can fasttrack that. Digging
> up your last patchset was already on my todo list.
Here we go. I attached a patch (against wi
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 01:24 +0200, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> + err = rfkill_register(sc->rf_kill.rfkill);
> + if (err) {
> + sc->rf_kill.rfkill = NULL;
> + return -1;
> + }
Missing rfkill_free, and why -EPERM? Could you try to work against v11
of my rf
