On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 08:15 +1300, Derek Smithies wrote:
> Hi,
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Franczen Attila wrote:
>
> > 2010/3/11 Pavel Roskin
> > ath5k has some issues with calibration that MadWifi
> > doesn't have, so MadWifi provides a better connection.
> >
> Are you saying that the throughput wi
2010/3/11 Pavel Roskin
>
> It looks like an antenna is disconnected either on the station side, or
> on the AP side. ath5k has some issues with calibration that MadWifi
> doesn't have, so MadWifi provides a better connection.
>
> Is there any way to be sure? If yes, is there a fix?
> Another p
Hi,
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Franczen Attila wrote:
> 2010/3/11 Pavel Roskin
> ath5k has some issues with calibration that MadWifi
> doesn't have, so MadWifi provides a better connection.
>
Are you saying that the throughput with ath5k will be less than what
madwifi can achieve?
there were some re
2010/3/11 Pavel Roskin
>
> It looks like an antenna is disconnected either on the station side, or
> on the AP side. ath5k has some issues with calibration that MadWifi
> doesn't have, so MadWifi provides a better connection.
>
> Another possibility is that you have a problem with power saving o
