On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 09:09 -0800, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 08:55 -0800, reinette chatre wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 12:28 -0800, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> >
> > > sorry for cross-posting, but this issue really spans both iwl3945 and
> > > ath5k.
> > >
> > > I have two la
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 12:28 -0800, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> sorry for cross-posting, but this issue really spans both iwl3945 and ath5k.
>
> I have two laptops (acer 5720, and aspire one) and I see some strange speed
> issues.
>
> I initially blamed iwl3945, then thought it got fixed, but now I
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 08:55 -0800, reinette chatre wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 12:28 -0800, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>
> > sorry for cross-posting, but this issue really spans both iwl3945 and ath5k.
> >
> > I have two laptops (acer 5720, and aspire one) and I see some strange speed
> > issues.
Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
> Felix Fietkau a écrit :
>> While reading the code for calculating the frame duration, i noticed
>> something odd: It doesn't seem to be taking into account the short
>> vs long preamble distinction for ERP rates. IMHO this might be causing
>> issues like this. I've seen s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Felix Fietkau a écrit :
> While reading the code for calculating the frame duration, i noticed
> something odd: It doesn't seem to be taking into account the short
> vs long preamble distinction for ERP rates. IMHO this might be causing
> issues like t
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 10:43 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
> > I did a similar test here and results is very strange. AP was my good
> > old linksys WRT54G running an iperf server. Client was a laptop running
> > either ath5k or madwifi/trunk and an iperf client. Channel is
Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
> I did a similar test here and results is very strange. AP was my good
> old linksys WRT54G running an iperf server. Client was a laptop running
> either ath5k or madwifi/trunk and an iperf client. Channel is 5. Both
> drivers show the same behaviour.
>
> At the beginning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maxim Levitsky a écrit :
> Derek Smithies wrote:
>> Hi,
>> to verify that it is a rate control issue, there is one very simple and
>> very practical test.
>>
>> Take both ends of your link, and set them to fixed rate, and at the rate
>> you think it
Derek Smithies wrote:
> Hi,
> to verify that it is a rate control issue, there is one very simple and
> very practical test.
>
> Take both ends of your link, and set them to fixed rate, and at the rate
> you think it should be achieving.
> If you can achieve significantly higher throughputs wit
Hi,
to verify that it is a rate control issue, there is one very simple and
very practical test.
Take both ends of your link, and set them to fixed rate, and at the rate
you think it should be achieving.
If you can achieve significantly higher throughputs with fixed rate, you
know that the ra
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:28:29PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> I initially blamed iwl3945, then thought it got fixed, but now I have
> ath5k, and speeds are low
> and I suspect that both drivers has bugs regarding to speed.
Quite possible, but both use mac80211 for rate control. Which rate
c
Hi,
sorry for cross-posting, but this issue really spans both iwl3945 and ath5k.
I have two laptops (acer 5720, and aspire one) and I see some strange speed
issues.
I initially blamed iwl3945, then thought it got fixed, but now I have ath5k,
and speeds are low
and I suspect that both drivers h
12 matches
Mail list logo
