CD player, 20W amplifier, 4 speakers, iPod dock, internet and FM radio,
wi-fi music streamer, FLAC playback, Analog Devices Blackfin chipset.
+---+
|Filename: denon-smart-s-52dab-all-in-one-hi-fi-system-jpg-289-75.jpg|
|Download: ht
Time to build melistening room!
--
sleepysurf
squeezebox2 (with elpac linear psu) > benchmark dac1 > modwright swl
9.0se > belles 350a reference > ml summits. blue jeans cables.
sleepysurf's Profile: http://forums.slimdev
sleepysurf;241307 Wrote:
> Sean, methinks you can afford to buy new cabinets .
Mecan, except they're part of mehouse!
--
seanadams
seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3
View this thread:
seanadams;241301 Wrote:
>
> PS: as a receiver I think the Denon's specs look quite good, and in
> fact I would have gone with one in my own system except that my
> cabinets were too shallow.
Sean, methinks you can afford to buy new cabinets . In fact, you
should've been at RMAF (Rocky Mountain
You are comparing a music streamer (Transporter) that has minimial
receiver-like functions with an AV receiver (Denon) that happens to
have some minimal music-streamer-like functions. It's not a meaningful
"either/or" comparison.
I would suggest getting the right receiver for your needs, ignoring
It'd help if you were more specific about what Denon gear you're talking
about.
--
SuperQ
SuperQ's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2139
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.ph
Please help me out here. I just paid $1800 for a Transporter and Denon
has two machines for under $2,500 that do more. I'm new to this stuff
and I'm upgrading everything. I added Tetra speakers this summer and
trying to continue upgrading but this one throws me. I love Logitech
products and have b
sold. thanx
--
ratso
THE ULTIMATE 2 CH. BUDGET SYSTEM?
EMOTIVA BPA-1 MONOBLOCKS x4
BOLDER ANALOG MOD SB3
CHANNEL ISLANDS:
VDC-SB SQUEEZEBOX POWER SUPPLY
VAC-1 POWER SUPPLY
VHP-2 HEADPHONE AMP (AS PREAMP)
VPC-3 PASSIVE CONTROLLER
GALLO REF. 3.1
MONSTER CABLE POWER CONDITIONER
BLUE JEANS CABLE
I got my SB3 pretty stable, but therapists are expensive. Since my SB3
stopped going to it's sessions it has gotten worse
--
tomjtx
tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: h
Polarbear;241235 Wrote:
> Yes, I have used the passive out for quite some time. Just a second
> order filter after the AKM dac's. I have also new clock and new PSU for
> the dac's. These tweak's makes the behringer a very nice unit. Next up
> is to replace the sample rate converter (CS8420) with
Hay Zanash, did you glue the mdf/rubber/grannet together or just rest
them on top of each other, and did you help weight down your SB in any
way or just clamp the rear, Oh, and have you tried your platform under
the psu ?
OP ! if you have a linear/separate psu try the sorbothane under there
too.
Yes, I have used the passive out for quite some time. Just a second
order filter after the AKM dac's. I have also new clock and new PSU for
the dac's. These tweak's makes the behringer a very nice unit. Next up
is to replace the sample rate converter (CS8420) with a better one. The
8420 gets the "
netim3;237598 Wrote:
> You're missing the point - Linn have adopted UPnP - a completely open
> standard. So everything needed to do this is in the public domain.
>
> That might be true for control over a preamp, but having the preamp
> itself manage a datastream from a server and convert it woul
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19817
Question: S
Polarbear;241181 Wrote:
> I meant that people prefer it when used with an external DAC :)
> I built the SPDIF reciever myself yes. It's located inside a Behringer
> DCX2496.
>
> Cheers
> Bj
Nice.
Just shortly i found a link about somebody cancelling the whole exit
and simply uses a passive outpu
I meant that people prefer it when used with an external DAC :)
I built the SPDIF reciever myself yes. It's located inside a Behringer
DCX2496.
Cheers
Bj
--
Polarbear
Polarbear's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/mem
My Modwright Transporter's DAC was indeed overdriving the tube stage.
Dan fixed the design gaff in my player (he had been listening and
voicing with digital volume down somewhat, accidentally, and didn't
realize a couple of output measurements were off, relative to DAC
output) and has overnighted
Mr_Sukebe;241131 Wrote:
> I've heard the TACT system and own a Behringer. I feel that both have
> negative impact on the signal, despite processing only a digital
> signal.
>
> I'd assume that Inguz is less intrusive, but has anyone compared the
> sound with it in and out of use?
Well, I perso
Polarbear;241154 Wrote:
> Thanks Wombat
>
> That's why people prefer the Transporter.
>
> Cheers
> Bj
Not exactly. I love it as my digital preamp with 2 displays and
wonderful DAC :)
You build that receiver from Jocko Homo yourself?
--
Wombat
Transporter -> Avantgarde based monoblocks -> s
Thanks Wombat
That's why people prefer the Transporter. I have transformer coupled my
SB. And also added some padding resistors. Makes a nice difference.
Combined with the SPDIF reciever from Jocko Homo it's a nice combo. No
need for Transporter then.
Cheers
Bj
--
Polarbear
-
It is transformer coupled.
Have a look here: http://photos.lam.ws/gallery/1930618/3/98133932/Large
--
Wombat
Transporter -> Avantgarde based monoblocks -> self-made speakers
Wombat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com
> Aligning the slots in screw heads.
>
> Align the slots in all screw heads so that the slots are parallel to
> the earth's surface.
I've used posidrives for some shelves. Which axis should I align? Does
anyone stock polarised versions?
--
Fifer
---
So, if used with an extrenal DAC, you should not gain much in the
digital transmission (and thereby in sound quality)?
Bj
--
Polarbear
Polarbear's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12996
View this t
Fair point.
--
Fifer
Fifer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=639
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=40010
___
audiophiles
I've heard the TACT system and own a Behringer. I feel that both have
negative impact on the signal, despite processing only a digital
signal.
I'd assume that Inguz is less intrusive, but has anyone compared the
sound with it in and out of use?
--
Mr_Sukebe
SB+, Behringer 2496DEQ, Bel Canto
zanash;24 Wrote:
> Quite serious you've used all their products ?
Of course I haven't - are you serious??? Oh wait - I already asked you
that...
I like this one:
the Best Proof of Audio Placebo Wrote:
>
>
> Aligning the slots in screw heads.
>
> Align the slots in all screw heads
Fifer;240836 Wrote:
> Not if you use squeezenetwork.
For RealAudio stations you will still need a PC/NAS to run AlienBBC and
transcode them.
--
funkstar
funkstar's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=
opaqueice;239218 Wrote:
> Are you actually serious?
>
> Irony is hard to detect over the internet, but I'm not sensing any at
> all here.
Quite serious you've used all their products ?
I've had the opportunity to try several and although some were found to
have no effect ..which only mea
interesting ...the only time I heard tact ..it sound ...well just sort
of processed ...even set to bypass it seemed to divest the music of
some life. I expect that the unit was not correctly calibrated [though
it had been dealer installed].
I've used the deq ...just feed it via the digital input
lets assume you didn't like the direction the thread was going from your
replies.
I used the simple expedient of clamping the sb3 by its rear foot to a
"vibration sink " made from a sheet of 18mm mdf 6mm rubber sheet and a
6mm granite placemat with felt feet. Yes it makes the unit sound
bette
30 matches
Mail list logo
