You're fine with Transporter at max. Its maximum output level is 3Vrms,
so it will not clip the Bryston.
--
seanadams
seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3
View this thread: http://forums.s
I connect my Transporter to a Bryston BP-25DA preamp via the balanced
XLR outputs (ie. I use the Transporter's DAC). I had always assumed
that it was best to have the volume control of the Transporter set all
the way up to 100, until I saw this thread on the Bryston forum:
http://www.audiocircle
bhaagensen;282186 Wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [...]
> Next question. Is compression not preferable to overly aggressive
> filtering as in above? Sure one gets a distorted waveform compared to
> the original source, on the other hand one can potentially avoid
> throwing too much stuff in the bin. If so what
Actually in a 16bit system, there are 32,767 discrete levels, positive
and negative. The most significant bit is used as the sign (+/-).
In a 24 bit system there are 8,388,607 levels (+/-)
Full amplitude (0db) is in both cases the maximum value that can be
stored in the word. A 24bit system has
You are mixing up amplitude (loudness) with frequency.
The Nyquist theory is all about the highest frequency that can be
reconstructed from a given sampling rate (i.e. half the sampling
frequency). If you try and record frequencies at more than the Nyquist
limit, what happens is that they are 'fo
bhaagensen;282186 Wrote:
>
> it's Easter and I seem to have time to wonder about all kinds of
> strange things, among which is subj.
>
Happy Easter, Bjørn
bhaagensen;282186 Wrote:
>
> I think that according to the Nyquist theorem sampling frequencies
> above 22.05 at 44.1 results in aliasing
Hi,
it's Easter and I seem to have time to wonder about all kinds of
strange things, among which is subj.
I think that according to the Nyquist theorem sampling frequencies
above 22.05 at 44.1 results in aliasing, therefore everything above
22.05 is filtered in the analoge domain before sampling
Kurt;282139 Wrote:
> I also haven't heard or seen that name since the 8-track days!
>
> I would agree that in-ceiling installations are less than optimal, and
> to be honest there are probably some manufactures that do a better job
> than Jensen, IMO.
>
> I know a lot of people that use speaker
I also haven't heard or seen that name since the 8-track days!
I would agree that in-ceiling installations are less than optimal, and
to be honest there are probably some manufactures that do a better job
than Jensen, IMO.
I know a lot of people that use speakers of this grade to do whole
house
Transporter (Wired Ethernet to QNAP TS-101 Built-in Slimserver)
Arcam A90 / P90 (Bi-Amping)
PMC Db1+ Speakers
Van Den Hul D102 Mk3 Interconnects
Van Damme Blue Series Loudspeaker Cable
Any thoughts or suggestions for improvement are welcome.
--
milanlad
---
seanadams;275014 Wrote:
> While I agree that audiophile cables are the most shameless kind of
> snake oil in this industry, and I would actually expect a coat hanger
> to make an acceptable speaker cable (low frequency, low-Z), I certainly
> would not say that all cables are BS.
>
The late John
Thank you for your very useful answers, now it's crystal clear for me!
--
didbox
didbox's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15290
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=4498
The SNR may not be an issue with the SB3 when using digital out, but it
WILL be an issue with the external DAC. An analog attenuator after the
DAC attenuates noise as well as signal, no matter where the DAC is (in
the SB or external).
So I think it comes down to audibility of the two methods and
13 matches
Mail list logo
