Nonreality;312578 Wrote:
> A lot of people will pass on accurate sound when given the choice the
> choice of crisper highs and louder lows. The days of dolby nr on
> cassettes proved that to me. Tapes were encoded with it but nobody
> ever hit the button. It would lower the highs and lows back
Some notes have been added to this bug. Basically it is the difference
in precision between MAD's portable fixed-point multiplier and the
x86-optimized version. There is possibly a better multiply routine we
could be using which would get closer to the X86 version.
Nenad, please relax. This does
Possibly of interest to any Inguz or brutefir users who have room
correction filters generated with Denis Sbragion's drc: version 3.0.0
was released today including:
"A new method for the computation of an optimized psychoacoustic target
response, based on the spectral envelope of the corrected i
Forgot the URL:
http://www.slimdevices.com/downloads/nightly/latest/7.1/
--
seanadams
seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t
TP V.43 is now in the SqueezeCenter 7.1 nightly builds. Please give it a
try if you are experiences issues with the knob in V.40+, or any audio
issues in versions prior to 40.
This build does not have any known, critical bugs. If you find anything
new, please let us know ASAP as the goal is to pu
And I still want to upgrade the Orbe / SME. Someone should put me in a
padded room for my own good :)
--
bigfool1956
David Ayers
Music is what counts, hifi just helps us enjoy it more
bigfool1956's Profile: http://forums.
bigfool1956;312623 Wrote:
> I think the answer lies in my post(s) on the 'photos of your transporter
> setup' thread.
>
> :)
ys - as I suspected :o)
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU -
Phil Leigh;312599 Wrote:
> Hmmm...possible. My system is very well "isolated" so maybe I won't see
> the differences that David refers to - but I'm pretty sure David is
> using some suitable mains conditioning...
I think the answer lies in my post(s) on the 'photos of your
transporter setup' thr
I wonder if Sean ever put the scope across the spdif whilst trying
different streaming/transcoding combos... :o)
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU - Altmann
JISCO/UPCI - TACT RCS 2.2X with Good
Themis;312594 Wrote:
> In my opinion, the differences between the SB and the Cambridge Audio
> transport simply come from the (poor) SB isolation. The CDT drive is
> very well isolated, while the SB is not : it needs explicit isolation.
>
> I experienced similar differences in the past and i was
In my opinion, the differences between the SB and the Cambridge Audio
transport simply come from the (poor) SB isolation. The CDT drive is
very well isolated, while the SB is not : it needs explicit isolation.
I experienced similar differences in the past and i was obliged to
change the power sup
bigfool1956;312584 Wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Yes, indeed I am, and my son agrees with me.
>
> Actually I was a bit surprised, because not only was I dubious there
> would be a difference, but also I thought that if there were a
> difference, then the nod would go to transcoding on the server (i.e.
Phil Leigh;312572 Wrote:
> David - are you saying that you can clearly hear (and prefer) native
> FLAC streaming and conversion over server-side conversion and streaming
> as WAV?
> Regards
> Phil
Hi Phil,
Yes, indeed I am, and my son agrees with me.
Actually I was a bit surprised, because no
Rodney_Gold;312511 Wrote:
> As far as I can make out , Im now doing the decoding on ther server
> rather than the TP, dunno why it makes a difference , perhaps cos im
> not doing DSP in the TP?
> Who knows..audio is sometimes unpredictable, I have compared 2
> or more transports side by s
bigfool1956;312566 Wrote:
> Native vs server decoding - yes
>
> Display off vs display on - yes, but such a minute difference that even
> someone as anal as me doesn't worry.
>
> First song better than the rest - not in my system with a Transporter.
David - are you saying that you can clearly
omega;312528 Wrote:
> Johan73 & Rodney_Gold
>
> There's another thing you can try:
>
> http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36503
>
> Regards
Native vs server decoding - yes
Display off vs display on - yes, but such a minute difference that even
someone as anal as me doesn't worry.
Yeah native decoding means more processing on-board...but it means less
network traffic too. So if you're looking for rationalisations that
works both ways.
Until it's confirmed with a bit of blind testing *I'm* not going to
lose a jot of sleep over it though. Oh yes...the B word again. :)
Darren
funkstar;312545 Wrote:
> oh no, not again.
oh yes :o)
btw Omega, what did your friends at the lab conclude?
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU - Altmann
JISCO/UPCI - TACT RCS 2.2X with Good
oh no, not again.
--
funkstar
funkstar's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2335
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48900
___
Johan73 & Rodney_Gold
There's another thing you can try:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36503
Regards
--
omega
omega's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9336
View this thread: http
alZmtbr;312247 Wrote:
> Alex, you might get better results over at the Asylum...
>
> http://www.audioasylum.com/cgi/etv.mpl?forum=pcaudio
>
> SlimServer, now SqueezeCenter playing thru the
> SB's/Controller/Transporter is a slightly different animal then using
> the PC as the source itself.
>
As far as I can make out , Im now doing the decoding on ther server
rather than the TP, dunno why it makes a difference , perhaps cos im
not doing DSP in the TP?
Who knows..audio is sometimes unpredictable, I have compared 2
or more transports side by side to find differences between em...
The internet is a strange place.
You can find people who like hifi so much they would contemplate ...
well ...
--
SomeChap
SomeChap's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15878
View this thread: http:/
Rodney_Gold;312494 Wrote:
> Kjg, I just tried your suggestion and can clearly hear a difference ,
> especially in the bass. didn't think it would affect things in the
> digital domain , but it doesBass inst as thin..Switched
> back to the old system to see if I was perhaps imagining i
Kjg, I just tried your suggestion and can clearly hear a difference ,
especially in the bass. didn't think it would affect things in the
digital domain , but it doesBass inst as thin..Switched
back to the old system to see if I was perhaps imagining it , but no ,
def an increase in low
Nonreality;312401 Wrote:
> $500 at Amazon and you really need to read the reviews, great fun.
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000I1X6PM
Great fun indeed but who is going to look at a Denon receiver in the
same way again?
--
honestguv
26 matches
Mail list logo
