jgs;316821 Wrote:
> What were your settings before (that weren't so good)?
ALAC -> FLAC
--
GuyDebord
Verity Audio Tamino X2 wired with v/d Hul Inspiration, REL Strata5.
AMPS: Pathos Classic One MKIII's in mono config. ANALOGUE: Clearaudio
Ambient CMB, Satisfy Carbon & Lyra Helikon SL, ASR Ba
m1abrams;317316 Wrote:
> Well I not sure about insecure rippers handling those CDs well. I have
> a CD that has this attempt at DRM in place and I did rip it with iTunes
> and it ripped very quickly however when I played it back it was full of
> pops and clicks. Ran it through EAC and it took
m1abrams;317316 Wrote:
> Well I not sure about insecure rippers handling those CDs well. I have
> a CD that has this attempt at DRM in place and I did rip it with iTunes
> and it ripped very quickly however when I played it back it was full of
> pops and clicks. Ran it through EAC and it took
esbrewer;317310 Wrote:
> I'm not sure I follow the reasoning here.
>
> If iTunes and other less secure rippers popular with the general public
> do not get hung up on such purposeful errors - where is the deterrent
> value in their inclusion?
Well, record companies aren't the sharpest knives
esbrewer;317310 Wrote:
> I'm not sure I follow the reasoning here.
>
> If iTunes and other less secure rippers popular with the general public
> do not get hung up on such purposeful errors - where is the deterrent
> value in their inclusion? Or are the record companies trying to deter
> the
I'm not sure I follow the reasoning here.
If iTunes and other less secure rippers popular with the general public
do not get hung up on such purposeful errors - where is the deterrent
value in their inclusion? Or are the record companies trying to deter
the admittedly small percentage of peopl
sc53;317065 Wrote:
> But if it takes 20 mins per disc (Apple Lossless takes about 5 mins per
> disk) or requires tons of initial setup etc. I'd use iTunes and not
> worry about that one track out of thousands that may contain an audible
> error.
There are two separate processes here - ripping an
darrenyeats;317288 Wrote:
> Well I did say IME. :)
>
> Perhaps I'm spoiled with cdparanoia on Linux...the following sums up my
> view. http://folk.uio.no/hpv/linuxtoons/dilbert-unix.png
> Darren
That made me laugh - thanks Darren!
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets
david_a_woodward;317191 Wrote:
> Wow, thanks for all the help, very active forum!! thought a question
> about iTunes v open standards might provoke some debate!
>
Ah now see you posted in the Audiophile forums. If you wanted some
debate you should ask if a $10,000 power cord for your refriger
Phil Leigh;317064 Wrote:
> There are some discs with flawed copy protection schemas that need many
> many sector re-reads to get the data off acurately...
>
> For example, I have The Beatles Let it Be Naked that takes 2 hours to
> rip with EAC and the disc is in physically mint condition!
Well I
Robin Bowes;317136 Wrote:
>
> Pascal,
>
> These are PA speakers, designed for high-volume sound-reinforcement.
>
> Sure, yours will be great for a party in a big room, but I'll be
> extremely surprised if they can reproduce sound as accurately as a pair
>
> of hifi speakers.
>
> R.
One of
Robin Bowes wrote:
> These are PA speakers, designed for high-volume sound-reinforcement.
>
> Sure, yours will be great for a party in a big room, but I'll be
> extremely surprised if they can reproduce sound as accurately as a pair
> of hifi speakers.
Big room? Some PA speakers can fill footba
Robin Bowes;317207 Wrote:
> Conversely, hifi speakers wouldn't be all that good at a stadium gig
> [3].
Notwithstanding the audience would probably not appreciate Martin
Logan's spoiling their sight ... :D
--
sebp
System : Mac Mini for ripping to FLAC (Max) > SqueezeCenter 7.0.1
running on a
Thanks all for the replies, I think SuperQ's idea makes good sense.
That's what I'll do--use both.
George
--
gsawdy
gsawdy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14330
View this thread: http://forums
The first sweep looks very much like aliasing caused by initial sampling
at 44.1KHz, with a 96KHz anti-aliasing filter applied on top.
The 22.05KHz to 30KHz-ish region, looks quite like a mirror image of
22.05KHz-14.1KHz-ish.
--
Patrick Dixon
www.at-tunes.co.uk
---
sebp wrote:
> Robin Bowes;317136 Wrote:
>> Sure, yours will be great for a party in a big room, but I'll be
>> extremely surprised if they can reproduce sound as accurately as a pair
>> of hifi speakers.R.
> Audiophiles really have no mercy.
> Hope you enjoyed the trip, Pascal. ;-)
I'm no audioph
I can only repeat myself, but now i ve actual prices. An Old Audio
Analogue (1.1, 1.2 DDE) can be buy from 110-130 USD. Real bargain, so
if you would like to upgrade but haven't much money, hear one of these
old stuffs. Improvement will be signifcant if D/A was the bottleneck of
system.
--
Saug
There is nothing so fierce as an audiophile rattled.
I bought got an SB3 15 months ago, and after 2 months of excitement and
ripping cd's I started to realise that there was something missing in
the output compared to my CD player (Musical Fidelity A3). Of course,
the functionality of the SB3
Wow, thanks for all the help, very active forum!! thought a question
about iTunes v open standards might provoke some debate! I have
downloaded dbpoweramp and am very impressed, seen enough to decide this
is the way to go, and rip to FLAC and also MP3 for iPod. Just need to
figure out how I get th
19 matches
Mail list logo
