Themis;335881 Wrote:
> I agree with you on this point, it's the same to me. But, I suppose that
> some people feel a $500 cable is an equally relevant value for them, and
> it's hard (for me) to laugh at them simply because I use a different
> value-measuring method. Objectively, even the author
nolan;336295 Wrote:
> I'm very tempted to give Inguz a try, can I use it on one of my
> Squeezeboxes and leave the other two untouched.
>
> Does it work ok with the stable 7.2 release?
I have it working with SC 7.2 (on a Mac). I have the DSP engine with
the later expiration date. I also had t
Sorry I have not been around for a few days. I was just stating what I
have found based on my experience. I am definately not a Linnie,
because I have spent huge dollars on Linn gear and am not happy with
the results all of the time. You can really get me going about lessons
learned with regards t
darrenyeats;336277 Wrote:
> Inguz DSP runs on the server before the data gets streamed to the player
> - so no it won't work.
> Darren
I thought that the Transporter could relay packets back to the server
through the network connection and then receive and decode them after
application of the DS
Interesting graphs. So what's the theory to explain the last one? I
can't imagine any way that applying a scaling function to two discreet
audio streams in software would affect crosstalk (but then I'm not
always very imaginative!).
--
radish
joeriz;336153 Wrote:
> Just another data point here regarding the volume control on the
> Transporter (or the SB3 for that matter) as there has been much
> churning here on the forums about dropping bits, etc: I run my
> Transporter directly into my power amp which has no volume control.
> Thus
opaqueice;336332 Wrote:
> But Monster and other cable manufacturers advertise their cables as
> improving audio quality (when they obviously don't).
So the placebo effect is not real?
opaqueice;336332 Wrote:
> That's false advertising and probably illegal.
It is usually a problem if an objectiv
nuhi;336109 Wrote:
> Because it is immoral to sell cables for these prices knowing that all
> the sonic difference is based on a placebo effect.
Why is it immoral? Exotic audiophile cables are luxury goods. The
manufacturers and suppliers of luxury goods invest a lot of time and
effort building p
opaqueice;336333 Wrote:
> Hugh just released a new version. I haven't tried it, but it probably
> works with 7.2 without the hack.
I think Hugh has provided a new download for the DSP bit which fixes
the 'expiry warning' on the display. The bit which needs the hack is
the Plugin and I can't find
darrenyeats;336315 Wrote:
>
> It doesn't but the only issue (apparently) is the value in a config
> file. If you hack this file it works with 7.2 or at least it does for
> me on Linux. For details see
> http://forum.inguzaudio.com/index.php?showtopic=94&pid=481&st=0&#entry481
> post #2. The Plug
If someone thinks something is worth so much then (to him or her) it is.
This is self-evident and is SO NOT the point. :)
The real debate is about whether the product has been presented fairly
which can be a grey area. In other words where does "fair" marketing
spin cross over into misinformation
nolan;336295 Wrote:
> I'm very tempted to give Inguz a try, can I use it on one of my
> Squeezeboxes and leave the other two untouched.
I believe it adds extra fields for each player to allow Inguz FLAC or
WAV streaming for the main file types in Squeezecenter
Settings>Advanced>File Types. I've n
I'm very tempted to give Inguz a try, can I use it on one of my
Squeezeboxes and leave the other two untouched.
Does it work ok with the stable 7.2 release?
--
nolan
nolan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.p
scintilla;336270 Wrote:
> Hey, can someone clue me in whether the inguz plugin can be applied to
> the audio of an external digital source feeding one of the digital
> inputs on the Transporter? I have couple of digital sources that I
> would like to be able to DRC.
Inguz DSP runs on the server
Hey, can someone clue me in whether the inguz plugin can be applied to
the audio of an external digital source feeding one of the digital
inputs on the Transporter? I have couple of digital sources that I
would like to be able to DRC.
--
scintilla
--
My Meridian processor can be controlled via RS-232.
What I'd like to do is have the Transporter adjust the Gain on the
Meridin Preamp with the replay gain settings.
Is it possible?
It would also allow full control of the entire system through the
Duet.
I realize this would require code. I'm ju
joeriz;336153 Wrote:
> Just another data point here regarding the volume control on the
> Transporter (or the SB3 for that matter) as there has been much
> churning here on the forums about dropping bits, etc: I run my
> Transporter directly into my power amp which has no volume control.
> Thus
coppo23;335836 Wrote:
> Then discovered the volume control wasn't remote on the DAC and I was
> worried about losing resolution by controlling digitally only.
Just another data point here regarding the volume control on the
Transporter (or the SB3 for that matter) as there has been much
churning
Themis;335881 Wrote:
> ... what's the point in spending all this energy at "ridiculizing" these
> poor cables ? I wonder.
Because it is immoral to sell cables for these prices knowing that all
the sonic difference is based on a placebo effect.
Best part is when they (some cable manufacturer) say
19 matches
Mail list logo
