DCtoDaylight wrote:
> Actually, I've read several people who say that being in an anechoic
> chamber causes a lot of people to feel very uneasy. It's such an
> unnatural experience that it's difficult to feel comfortable.
I've been in two of them, I don't know how many are in this state
(Virginia
Labarum;389644 Wrote:
> Faraday cage? Which of us headed for the padded cell? Still, I suppose
> it might be the next best thing to an anechoic chamber!
Don't knock it - I've experienced telecoms equipment spontaneously
changing its' programming due to RFI. Changing said equipment out for
metal
Labarum;389644 Wrote:
> I suppose it might be the next best thing to an anechoic chamber!
Actually, I've read several people who say that being in an anechoic
chamber causes a lot of people to feel very uneasy. It's such an
unnatural experience that it's difficult to feel comfortable.
--
DC
Let me say it again. I can't hear any difference.
But the latest software will on the fly downsample the very few 24/96
files I have.
--
Labarum
Brian
Squeezebox 3 Classic and Virgin Cable Box
Beresford DAC TC-7510 MK6/4 - Quad 405-2 refurbished by 405man
Quart 980s German Tower Loudspeakers
darthkringle wrote:
> Am I being paranoid?
Yes. But remember, just because you are being paranoid, that doesn't
mean that they are not out to get you.
I'm listening today to the beta 7.4 stuff, and I hear no difference.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
Hello all. In reading through this thread, I "think" that most of the
perceived differences come down to settings; however, being an audio
purist and being quite happy with 7.2.1, I am hesitant to move to 7.3.2
in fear of compromising audio quality in ANY way. Am I being paranoid?
Thanks.
--
Faraday cage? Which of us headed for the padded cell? Still, I suppose
it might be the next best thing to an anechoic chamber!
--
Labarum
Brian
Squeezebox 3 Classic and Virgin Cable Box
Beresford DAC TC-7510 MK6/4 - Quad 405-2 refurbished by 405man
Quart 980s German Tower Loudspeakers.
-
If you believe that airborne RFI is an issue I suppose it follows that
you should screen your equipment - ideally in a Faraday cage.
These guys make all sorts of shielding products, from cable wraps to
Faraday cage tents and even rooms .. tweakers Nirvana. You saw it here
first.
http://www.shie
regalma1;389468 Wrote:
> I am going to stick my neck out here and suggest that rather than spend
> a fortune on what appears to be ridiculously expensive aftermarked
> linear power supplies use power filtering and isolation on the stock
> supply. I have read so many results from so many people an
regalma1;389468 Wrote:
> I am going to stick my neck out here and suggest that rather than spend
> a fortune on what appears to be ridiculously expensive aftermarked
> linear power supplies use power filtering and isolation on the stock
> supply.
The power supply in question is less that £20.
I am going to stick my neck out here and suggest that rather than spend
a fortune on what appears to be ridiculously expensive aftermarked
linear power supplies use power filtering and isolation on the stock
supply. I have read so many results from so many people and it seems
that sometimes the sw
I run both my SB Duet and my SAT CD player through a benchmark audio
DAC1 and can't differentiate between the two sources. Before adding in
the DAC, my CD player was a clear notch above the Duet although that is
not surprising given it cost about eight times as much.
In my opinion, The Benchmark
I would say definetaly not Brian.
Haven't tried it to be honest, but the difference hooking the SB3 up to
the Dac was far bigger than adding the PSU to the SB3/Bdac setup.
It would improve the analogue SB3, this in fact is where most believers
say the difference is made the most.
If your intere
13 matches
Mail list logo
