dennis55;438863 Wrote:
> Phil, "I must have played the vinyl version of Argus at least 200
> times"only 200?.
> i have a musicassette of this album and it's worn very thin!,also a
> vinyl version which is in good nick on the LP12.
> Would love a 180g vinyl copy.
> my ripped version on
Phil, "I must have played the vinyl version of Argus at least 200
times"only 200?.
i have a musicassette of this album and it's worn very thin!,also a
vinyl version which is in good nick on the LP12.
Would love a 180g vinyl copy.
my ripped version on the Qnap via the Transporter is Ver
regalma1;438847 Wrote:
> You definitely do not want to use the analog outputs on the DEQ. Of all
> the DACs I have compared it is the worst by a large margin. It is
> muffled and dull. No liveliness in the upper ranges.
Agree, both Behringers share the same standard output hence the
multiple aft
You definitely do not want to use the analog outputs on the DEQ. Of all
the DACs I have compared it is the worst by a large margin. It is
muffled and dull. No liveliness in the upper ranges.
--
regalma1
regalma1's Profile:
I've found after some time living with EQ that it's best to leave the
non-bass frequencies alone. Messing with EQ at normal frequencies is
fraught in terms of measurement and I feel takes away from the
naturalness of the sound. YM certainly MV. :)
Inguz has excellent filters and there's no S/PDIF
krzys wrote:
> Ok then Phil, since I got the permission ;-)
Thanks Phil ;)
> I mentioned the DEQ just because regalma1 compared it to Inguz DRC.
> Speaking about DEQ it is a nice piece of gear for the price. I used it
> more than a year. I started with the DCX which have some EQ capacity and
> th
Ok then Phil, since I got the permission ;-)
I mentioned the DEQ just because regalma1 compared it to Inguz DRC.
Speaking about DEQ it is a nice piece of gear for the price. I used it
more than a year. I started with the DCX which have some EQ capacity and
thought the DEQ will do a better job for
krzys;438696 Wrote:
> Robin I still think that DEQ discussion is off topic on a squeezebox
> forum. Please send me an email to the address given in my previous post.
>
> Chris
It would have been quicker if you had just answered Robin's question...
which is most certainly not off-topic, since yo
Robin I still think that DEQ discussion is off topic on a squeezebox
forum. Please send me an email to the address given in my previous post.
Chris
--
krzys
krzys's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid
krzys wrote:
> Robin your question is quite off topic, maybe you can send me a PM and I
> will respond directly.
I don't think it's off-topic.
However, perhaps you'd prefer to start a new thread?
Either way, I read the mailing list, not the forum so PMs aren't a lot
of use to me.
R.
_
Robin your question is quite off topic, maybe you can send me a PM and I
will respond directly.
Chris
krzys7...@yahoo.com
--
krzys
krzys's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2256
View this thread: ht
krzys wrote:
> I tried the DEQ and abandoned it.
Can you explain why?
R.
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
amcluesent;438216 Wrote:
> I'm thinking if making up these IR controller kits -
> http://www.maplin.co.uk/Module.aspx?ModuleNo=220034 - to provide the 12V
> trigger on the power amps.
>
> It would be easier to use a 12V line from within the TP, just wondering
> if there is one to pick-up before
amcluesent;438216 Wrote:
> I'm thinking if making up these IR controller kits -
> http://www.maplin.co.uk/Module.aspx?ModuleNo=220034 - to provide the 12V
> trigger on the power amps.
>
> It would be easier to use a 12V line from within the TP, just wondering
> if there is one to pick-up before
14 matches
Mail list logo
