Dennis...yes , when PS audio introduce their bridge module , I can
supposedly dispense with my TP..early 2010..
I tried various other DACs , Red wine audio, cambridge , benchmark and
Theta but liked the sonics of the perfectwave and the future ability to
link to a NAS etc was the cherry on the top
ccrome2;468035 Wrote:
> Thanks for the correct spelling. I found this
> http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=13285 (from Wolfson), among
> other links.
>
> However, now that I re-read your original post, I see that you want to
> reduce the pre-echo artifacts on 44.1 recordings. I'm not sur
Isn't it the impulse response of the filter he's trying to correct for?
An ideal filter would have an identity impulse response (other than
its low pass behaviour) - so by correcting the pre + post echo of a real
filter, you get an ideal filter? with no apparent pre or post ringing
e.g. somethi
mark wollschlager;467071 Wrote:
> How was the quality of the B-stock?
> The price is pretty attractive.
>
> mark
I couldn't even find a scratch or dent... so they must have very strict
quality standards. Maybe a little blemish on the top of the right.
Your results may vary, but that's what I
I made progress on getting the impulse response and transfer function of
the filters sox is making for me. (It took me a while to figure out how
to create a custom wav file to process with sox that contained just an
impulse.)
The attached jpeg's show the results for
Code:
dsdreamer;466679 Wrote:
> Inspired by the latest Stereophile issue and the Ayre USB DAC, I was
> wondering why not create a custom-convert file to do antipodal filtering
> as part of an upsampling scheme to 96kHz. The idea would be to eliminate
> some of the pre-echo artifacts on 44.1kHz recordin
JezA;468012 Wrote:
> Or even apodizing ...
I'm English. It's our language. ;-)
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
SB Touch Beta (wired) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W -
MF Triplethreat(Audiocom fu
Or even apodizing ...
--
JezA
JezA's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=21219
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69145
___
au
Rodney,interesting reading your post re your Transporter and it's
apparent shortcomings
have you tried/heard the offerings from Linn Products or Naim Audio?.
your PS Audio DAC(?) seems to duplicate many of your Transporter's
functions.
my Transporter's performance thru' my lowly system is
Apodising...
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
SB Touch Beta (wired) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W -
MF Triplethreat(Audiocom full mods) - Linn 5103 - Aktiv 5.1 system (6x
LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KA
I've never heard of antipodal filtering, and I can't find anything on
the stereophile site (or anywhere else for that matter).
Do you have a link.
The way to get the impulse response of a filter is to. drum roll
please... put an impulse in.
An impulse is simply a source file with exactly 1
Rodney_Gold;467597 Wrote:
> There is no argument as to whether different dacs sound different so as
> I said , if the TP's dac is not to your taste - try another. Or are you
> saying that all dacs sound the same?
I'm not saying that "all dacs sound the same". I'm asking "what makes
the dacs soun
There is no argument as to whether different dacs sound different so as
I said , if the TP's dac is not to your tsste - try another. Or are you
saying that all dacs sound the same?
I use an extremely revealing system , the Sehheisser HD 800's are
regarded as the best headphones in the world ...I
the question is what were you doing there... ;-)
quote:
Leeloo: ...jella boom!
Korben Dallas: Boom. Yeah! I understand boom.
Leeloo: Bada boom.
Korben Dallas: Big... yeah, big bada boom.
Leeloo: Big! Bada big boom! Big! BOOM!
Korben Dallas: Yeah! Big bada boom!
Leeloo: Bada boom!
Korben D
On 06/10/09 09:58, Themis wrote:
>
> seanadams;467358 Wrote:
>> I don't mean to give the manufacturer too hard of a time, in fact it
>> looks like a reasonable product and I think just a pot might be OK for
>> many situations. But it is no panacea... personally I would prefer a)
>> full level sig
Rodney_Gold;467412 Wrote:
> The output of the TP CAN be substantially improved upon with the
> addition of a DAC , try a few and see what floats your boat. Not
> everyone has the same sonic preferences and not all dacs sound
> alikethe best for one person may not be the best for you...
"subs
seanadams;467358 Wrote:
> I don't mean to give the manufacturer too hard of a time, in fact it
> looks like a reasonable product and I think just a pot might be OK for
> many situations. But it is no panacea... personally I would prefer a)
> full level signals going into an amp with a gain knob o
17 matches
Mail list logo
