michael123;516935 Wrote:
> No, I did not try. Did you compare it to Transporter? Other DACs?
Yes. I have transporter and MW transporter. Q9 beats both of them.
--
adyc
adyc's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member
FWIW...Since my Transporter constitutes the entire front end of my
system...I've simply used the internal jumpers in my TP to reduce output
by -10db. This in turn allows me to have the TPs digital volume
control in the 75-100 range for normal to loud listening levels. More
than adequate.
I'm
adyc;516890 Wrote:
> Have you tried Ayre Q9 DAC? It is a USB DAC with minimum phase filter. I
> got one in my setup. I think the sound is quite special.
No, I did not try. Did you compare it to Transporter? Other DACs?
--
michael123
Have you tried Ayre Q9 DAC? It is a USB DAC with minimum phase filter. I
got one in my setup. I think the sound is quite special.
--
adyc
adyc's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12564
View this thre
Robin Bowes;516823 Wrote:
> On 13/02/10 16:56, michael123 wrote:
> >
> > Heard Weiss Minerva yesterday.
> > It is a very precise instrument. I do not think it is years ahead of
> > Transporter but I think it is a bit more 'refined' with high-rez
> music,
> > and of course with 192/24 that sound
On 13/02/10 16:56, michael123 wrote:
>
> Heard Weiss Minerva yesterday.
> It is a very precise instrument. I do not think it is years ahead of
> Transporter but I think it is a bit more 'refined' with high-rez music,
> and of course with 192/24 that sound better than their downsampled
> version to
Who has recordings with -say- 80dB transient passages ? oO
--
Themis
SB3 - North Star dac 192 - Croft 25Pre and Series 7 power - Sonus Faber
Grand Piano Domus
Themis's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?use
Heard Weiss Minerva yesterday.
It is a very precise instrument. I do not think it is years ahead of
Transporter but I think it is a bit more 'refined' with high-rez music,
and of course with 192/24 that sound better than their downsampled
version to 96KHz on Transporter.
I cannot say yet that the
PM sent :-)
--
tingtong5
tingtong5's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9671
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69145
___
aud
tingtong5;516634 Wrote:
> Yep, it has more body (in a positive way) to the sound and almost sounds
> a bit tubey :-)
Indeed!
1) I spent couple of hours yesterday to integrate back polyphase &
rabbit :-)
2) I also fixed the dithering bug (another few hours..)
3) I made a command line switch to (
michael123;516615 Wrote:
> I think polyphase returned me some 'punch' I was missing with the 'rate'
> effect
Yep, it has more body (in a positive way) to the sound and almost
sounds a bit tubey :-)
--
tingtong5
tingtong5
michael123;516524 Wrote:
> took me couple of hours to integrate polyphase back into 14.3
>
> Did you use "polyphase -cutoff 1.0" ?
Yes I used -cutoff 1.0, tried 0.85 as well but we preferred 1.0.
I also tried to integrate polyphase into 14.3 source code and thougt it
compiled without errors it
michael123;516461 Wrote:
> - What was the command line for minimum phase?
> - Which SoX version did you use for polyphase and rabbit? Could you
> please post command line as well?
Hello Michael,
Sure, I compared these:
Code:
/usr/share/squeezeboxserver/Bin/i386-lin
13 matches
Mail list logo
