Search these forums a little and you'll see that this has been analyzed
more carefully by others and discussed at great length, and the
consensus seems to be yes. Based on my own side-by-side non-blind
testing I think so, too.
--
aubuti
--
Short answer: Touch is a better digital transport than SB Classic. See
links in this message for some related discussion.
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=562515&postcount=3
--
garym
garym's Profile: http://fo
Does the Touch sound better than the Classic from the digital output?
--
goopie
goopie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16161
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=80557
John, you mentioned you were working on this and had got it ALMOST
there?
Any update as of yet?
Thanks
Gaz.
--
Gazjam
Gazjam's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18604
View this thread: http://forums
your momo;562730 Wrote:
> Currently I made very good experience with the BNC out, but I could not
> hear clear difference between AES or S/PDIF data format.
seanadams;562845 Wrote:
> There isn't supposed to be.
To expand a little on Sean's comment, there is no difference in the
signal data tra
On 19/07/10 22:40, Nomis wrote:
>
> To Robin Bowes - I'm based near Oxford.
Ah, OK.
Was going to suggest a lend of my Transporter if you were nearer.
If you can afford it, you won't be disappointed with the Transporter, IMHO.
R.
___
audiophiles maili
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=79339
--
JJZolx
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=80550
__
Are all Transporter versions the same? I've noticed sellers advertising
specific P/N's. Or is the P/N a unit serial number?
P/N 830-xx
P/N 930-xx
--
baten
baten's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?u
Hi,
Thanks for all the advice and pointers!
The verdict on the Touch seems to be mixed, both as an analogue and
digital source. While it's acknowledged that the Transporter can be
improved, the concensus appears to be positive ... at least enough to
convince me it's worth tracking one down to ha
your momo;562730 Wrote:
>
> Currently I made very good experience with the BNC out, but I could not
> hear clear difference between AES or S/PDIF data format.
There isn't supposed to be.
--
seanadams
seanadams's Profile
iPhone;562836 Wrote:
> Come on Michael, don't you need to qualify that post?! If I remember
> correctly you have had you Transporter modified so you would not be
> comparing an OEM TP to an OEM Touch. So its also not your system, its
> more specifically your modified TP that matters!
no, no, I m
michael123;562819 Wrote:
> TP
> _On_my_system_, Touch was not even close..
>
>
Come on Michael, don't you need to qualify that post?! If I remember
correctly you have had you Transporter modified so you would not be
comparing an OEM TP to an OEM Touch. So its also not your system, its
more spe
michael123;562820 Wrote:
> Every interface today outputs bit perfect, time perfect is the
> interesting one..
I like that...
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/XP) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibr
Every interface today outputs bit perfect, time perfect is the
interesting one..
--
michael123
michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/sho
TP
_On_my_system_, Touch was not even close..
1200 pounds might be a lot of money, buy on eBay or audiogon (new one)
for less.
--
michael123
michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745
View
seanadams;562657 Wrote:
> Indeed, the voltages are completely different. However, they will always
> be correct on the respective interface - each has its own electronics
> for the driving circuit. The software setting only controls the
> contents of the data stream, which is sent to all ports th
Nomis;562511 Wrote:
> I mean is the Transporter *really* a better digital source than the Duet
> or Touch? I'm prepared to take a punt even on a "dead" product if it is
> the best way to go.
>
Yes. It is my opinion that the Transporter is the best source of all
the Squeezeboxes for both Digital
But Inguz does EQ consumes and negligible CPU time on my laptop. Most
people just want bass and treble, but frankly one you have done that
you may as well give a full EQ option ...
Do you have any experience of Inguz with Windows 7?
--
rbl
--
rbl;562738 Wrote:
> Does anyone have it working on Windows 7 (32 bit) and 7.5.0? Mine seems
> temperamental to say the least! Sometimes works, sometimes works but
> with only one SB3 connected, and sometimes never works.
>
> Why oh why won't Logitech just build EQ in??
Good EQ is not si
Does anyone have it working on Windows 7 (32 bit) and 7.5.0? Mine seems
temperamental to say the least! Sometimes works, sometimes works but
with only one SB3 connected, and sometimes never works.
Why oh why won't Logitech just build EQ in??
--
rbl
-
seanadams;562657 Wrote:
>
> Actually for the best signal you should use either of the 75Ω coax
> outputs. Although TP implements AES/EBU as well as possible, it is a
> defective specification and its only practical use is to take advantage
> of microphone cables you might have lying around the s
gdg;562708 Wrote:
> I've been told that my iMac (newest 27") doesn't output a bit perfect
> data stream. Would I be able to get this with a Squeezebox Touch?
You can have a very good data stream with your iMac, provided you have
the right setup :
http://www.benchmarkmedia.com/wiki/index.php/ITun
22 matches
Mail list logo
