this is very interesting...
thank all of you for your comments!
-Gian
--
gian
gian's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6702
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=81216
_
RonM;569121 Wrote:
> Ah, well. I ordered black.
>
> Came yesterday, still in the box, will be set up shortly.
>
> R.
Set up, working fine, haven't really listened much yet. First
impression is that the output level is lower than the receiver (higher
volume on the amp is required for same s
JJZolx;569127 Wrote:
> These simply are NOT factors for the typical user, particularly if they
> had already been running SbS and using an older player like the SB3.
> The typical user is going to use the Touch exactly like the SB3, isn't
> going to have any hi-res files, and isn't going to noti
funkstar,i sympathise with you on your Transporter problem.
i converted 1 Linn Ikemi 1 Linn Pekin 1 Linn Aktiv Tunebox 3 Linn
LK280's and a pair of Linn Kabers into a Transporter and a new set of
Totem speakersnever looked back! :)
dennis
funkstar;566529 Wrote:
> Whether it is or
your memory certainly serves you!
That took about thirty seconds to fix.
Thanks ever so
--
mashley
mashley's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=36549
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.co
AVRO has classical streams up to 320kbps, do a search on the internet
radio tab. Sounds very nice!
--
ghostrider
ghostrider's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18959
View this thread: http://forums.s
You do this from the setup networking screen. If you scroll down you
will see an option for current settings. Choose that and then scroll
down until you see MAC address for the player. Check the sticker on the
bottom and if they don't match, right arrow and you will have the option
to update the a
mlsstl;569321 Wrote:
> Just to throw another opinion in the mix, I'm not sure I'd do anything
> if the bulk of your listening is internet radio.
>
> I have both a SB3 (in a second system) and a Touch (main system.) The
> SB3 used to be in my main system and used with an external DAC.
>
> To m
Just to throw another opinion in the mix, I'm not sure I'd do anything
if the bulk of your listening is internet radio.
I have both a SB3 (in a second system) and a Touch (main system.) The
SB3 used to be in my main system and used with an external DAC.
To my ears, the Touch was good enough to
gian;569316 Wrote:
> I knew not that it had an internal SBS, can it manage other Touches or
> SBs on the local network?
>
> may I ask what is "native hi-res playback"?
>
> ciao,
> -Gian
"Yes" it's not an powerfull server, but it can do it, with some
limitations as no web interface etc.
Hi-re
Phil,
thanks for your kind reply.
I will consider purchasing a Touch, although I feel totally redundant
the touch interface. I only use a pc to manage my SBs, I even forget I
have a remote control.
Your point number three surprised me most: in my ignorance, I would
have said that digital is dig
Louishlomador;569164 Wrote:
>
> I personally will not use Flac as i still can tell differences bewteen
> Flac and wave. There isn't even a camparism between Flac and Wave, on
> the official flac website. I just find that a bit strange. link below.
> Wavepack is not the same as wave. on the same
gian;569227 Wrote:
> hello All,
>
> it seems that everybody is positive that a good power supply is the
> first step to improve SB3's sound.
>
> I am quite happy of the sound of my SB3s, but just because it's raining
> and I'm bored, I feel the kick to look for some improvement.
>
> While my C
hello All,
it seems that everybody is positive that a good power supply is the
first step to improve SB3's sound.
I am quite happy of the sound of my SB3s, but just because it's raining
and I'm bored, I feel the kick to look for some improvement.
While my CDs (classical) are ripped in FLAC, I m
14 matches
Mail list logo
