magiccarpetride;625428 Wrote:
> Maybe it is an urban myth, but I swear that I saw with my own eyes a
> bumblebee who could fly.
Of course they fly. And of course their flight is consistent with
aerodynamics/engineering principles and equations. The myth is the part
about the engineers producing a
The reason for the >=1.5m length has to do with controlling signal
reflection due to impedance discontinuity on the receiving end. For
example, my TacT 2.2xp has poor internal construction in terms of
impedance control. A 1.5m cable sounded significantly better than a 1m
cable from my Transporte
thanks
--
earwaxer9
System: modified Winsome Labs Mouse, modified Maggie MMG's, Transporter,
HSU sub 12, MSB DAC to 500 watt sub slave amp, JPS labs power cords,
Silver audio interconnect, Audioquest Granite speaker cable.
---
magiccarpetride;625427 Wrote:
> I raise my hand. To be perfectly honest, at first I thought that
> Soundcheck is just some nerdy geek with a huge techo-hardon who needs
> to go out more often and get a life and stop obsessing over
> excruciating minutia regarding the already great sounding Touch.
earwaxer9;625432 Wrote:
> Isnt dither something you only want to do if you are downsampling? Some
> clarification would be appreciated. I have noticed the dither option. I
> have not chosen it.
Since you have the internal precision of the resampler that is higher
as the 24bit signal you have in
Wombat;625350 Wrote:
> Pay attention to dither here. The sox plugin doesn´t dither by itself.
>
Isnt dither something you only want to do if you are downsampling? Some
clarification would be appreciated. I have noticed the dither option. I
have not chosen it.
--
earwaxer9
System: modified W
snottmonster;625405 Wrote:
> That'll be why it's an urban myth then.
Maybe it is an urban myth, but I swear that I saw with my own eyes a
bumblebee who could fly.
--
magiccarpetride
magiccarpetride's Profile: http://foru
Gazjam;625418 Wrote:
> fess up though...
>
> how many of you cynics have done the mods?
> (or at least tried and thought you heard a difference (Not necessarily
> a big improvement...but "something"?)
>
> just sayin' :)
I raise my hand. To be perfectly honest, at first I thought that
Soundchec
Gazjam;625418 Wrote:
> fess up though...
>
> how many of you cynics have done the mods?
> (or at least tried and thought you heard a difference (Not necessarily
> a big improvement...but "something"?)
>
> just sayin' :)
I didn't do the mods but still thought I heard an amazing difference.
Even
fess up though...
how many of you cynics have done the mods?
(or at least tried and thought you heard a difference (Not necessarily
a big improvement...but "something"?)
just sayin' :)
--
Gazjam
Gazjam's Profile: http://
jeza;625404 Wrote:
> the most important thing is to make sure all your digital cables are
> level, because 0's are heavier than 1's and if the cables are allowed
> to run downhill, the 0's will actually overtake the 1's after about 1m
> or so. This is the real reason that optical sounds so differ
magiccarpetride;625393 Wrote:
> Urban myth has it that engineers can produce an unassailable proof that
> bumblebees cannot possibly fly. And yet they somehow do...
That'll be why it's an urban myth then.
--
snottmonster
The most important thing is to make sure all your digital cables are
level, because 0's are heavier than 1's and if the cables are allowed
to run downhill, the 0's will actually overtake the 1's after about 1m
or so. This is the real reason that optical sounds so different from
co-ax s/pdif - opti
snottmonster;625364 Wrote:
> This all makes the assumption that the processor is handling low level
> WLAN communication such as encryption/decryption.
>
> It doesn't...
>
> I'll go out on a limb and suggest such an explanation only demonstrates
> a lack of engineering understanding on whoever
Phil Leigh;625383 Wrote:
> yes - you have missed 55 pages so far! :-)
Shhh - don't tell anyone, but I think I skipped pages 2 to 54...
--
snottmonster
snottmonster's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?useri
snottmonster;625382 Wrote:
> Ummm... I'm obviously late to the party on this one
yes - you have missed 55 pages so far! :-)
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/XP) - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M
Phil Leigh;625380 Wrote:
> ... and it won't be the last.
Ummm... Obviously late to the party on this one
--
snottmonster
snottmonster's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=45063
View this thread: http
paulster;625369 Wrote:
> It wouldn't be the first time in this thread...
... and it won't be the last.
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/XP) - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103
- f
snottmonster;625364 Wrote:
> I'll go out on a limb and suggest such an explanation only demonstrates
> a lack of engineering understanding on whoever suggested the idea in
> the first place.
It wouldn't be the first time in this thread...
--
paulster
Web Interface sending music to the wrong p
jeza;625360 Wrote:
> but then again if the processor has less work to do it's idle loop may
> generate rf at a higher but more stable frequency which could interact
> malevolently with some of the 1's or even hurt the feeling of a few 0's
> as opposed to the more generally random noise that perme
This all makes the assumption that the processor is handling low level
WLAN communication such as encryption/decryption.
It doesn't...
Which is why such an explanation only demonstrates a lack of
engineering understanding on whoever suggested idea in the first place.
--
snottmonster
-
But then again if the processor has less work to do it's idle loop may
generate rf at a higher but more stable frequency which could interact
malevolently with some of the 1's or even hurt the feeling of a few 0's
as opposed to the more generally random noise that permeates the
ionosphere when the
I'll still torn about these two speakers from Dali.
I can get the IKon 2 on the wall model for £549.00 and the Menuet for
£749
The main advantage i can see for the Menuet is that it can be shelf
mounted too. (if we ever move).
Below are the specs Menuet on the left. Your views please
Frequency
earwaxer9;625338 Wrote:
> I have switched to soX using foobar. It seems to be better, and it tests
> a bit better.
Pay attention to dither here. The sox plugin doesn´t dither by itself.
earwaxer9;625338 Wrote:
> From the limited feedback I have gotten so far, it appears there is some
> agreemen
Joking aside, I was under the impresion that one of the explaantions
profeered for the claimed inferioruity of wireless (as opposed to wired
ehternet) was that the decryptiomn put a strain on the processor. I
wonder whether it is in fact possible to turn of encryption for
messages between SBS and
JezA;625323 Wrote:
> Does WEP wireless encryption sound better or worse than WPA2? What is
> the best sounding encryption key you have tried? I like WEP with an
> encryption key of bbcc33221c the most, but I haven't tried all
> possibilities yet. Sometimes there is more space between the silences
Wombat;625288 Wrote:
> When you look into it and read about the delta-sigma design our
> Transporter uses you´ll notice it has the advantage to already only
> need pretty gentle filters. Maybe this is why Sean Adams didn´t take
> the slow roll-off in from the beginning.
> Afterwards you may think
jeza;625323 Wrote:
> does wep wireless encryption sound better or worse than wpa2? What is
> the best sounding encryption key you have tried? I like wep with an
> encryption key of bbcc33221c the most, but i haven't tried all
> possibilities yet. Sometimes there is more space between the silences
Does WEP wireless encryption sound better or worse than WPA2? What is
the best sounding encryption key you have tried? I like WEP with an
encryption key of bbcc33221c the most, but I haven't tried all
possibilities yet. Sometimes there is more space between the silences
with bbcc33222d but at the
Thanks again Phil.
--
Squeezed_Rotel
John Marshall
SqueezeCenter 7.3.4 running on a DIY PC, Windows 7 64 bit o.s., with
Inguz Audio EQ/DRC. (1) Transporter, & (4) Booms connected through a
Linksys WRT54gs router and Linksys WAP54g access point. Using an iPad
with both SqueezePad & iPeng for co
so 3600 is miles better than 4000, but worse than 12897 or whatever?
--
adamdea
adamdea's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37603
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=8474
earwaxer9;625250 Wrote:
> Where do I find the data sheet?
When you look into it and read about the delta-sigma design our
Transporter uses you´ll notice it has the advantage to already only
need pretty gentle filters. Maybe this is why Sean Adams didn´t take
the slow roll-off in from the beginni
http://www.asahi-kasei.co.jp/akm/en/product/ak4396/ak4396.html
--
michael123
Please fix http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16814
michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745
View th
33 matches
Mail list logo
