I have always been interested in this companys drivers .
http://www.audiotechnology.dk/iz.asp?id=4|a|132|||
But I shelfed my diy plans, mostly from lack of space living in
apartment leaves no hobby area and ofcourse my 10 thumbs ;) speaker
would have furniture quality not !
--
Mnyb
-
The forum search function is recommended this old issue has been
rehashed many times in different forms (same goes for Touch) for the at
least 5 years.
This is also a non problem as there is almost no real music available
in 192k
And some is sourced from consumer SACD ? who's ultrasonic noi
slate;633168 Wrote:
> Their drivers are used in many commercial speakers around the world.
>
> If you are into diy I can recommend that you take a look at Troels
> Gravesen site; here are a overview of his ScanSpeak based constructions
> http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/ScanSpeak.htm
>
> Madisound
As a "toy" project we are making this kit:
https://www.madisound.com/store/product_info.php?products_id=8830
We ordered the "vanilla" crossovers and the convenience kit.
I had a neighbor (who makes cabinets) order the 1" MDF and he
is
also cutting it. I will get the wood from him on Thursday.
Hi Soundcheck,
I'm hoping you are either too busy to respond to my earlier request
about your advice on setting the speed of the NIC, or not convinced by
what I say happened to me. Could you let me know either way?
I am aware I am repeating myself, which may be tedious to others on
this thread,
psweetie;633233 Wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation. Wonder whether the digital mod should
> potentially turn off the sound affects (and stop the unecessary process
> as you say) as well as muting the other outputs just to ensure that the
> crackles do not appear? Easy enough to do oneself but
michael123;633267 Wrote:
> The clock is not @ 48KHz, at some other freq, I do not remember..
> Of course it can "run" on 192Khz, it always runs on a constant
> frequency, regardless of signal
>
> And yes, we've been here before :)
> I feel good enough with 96Khz.
>
> Modern DACs now have suppor
The clock is not @ 48KHz, at some other freq, I do not remember..
Of course it can "run" on 192Khz, it always runs on a constant
frequency, regardless of signal
And yes, we've been here before :)
I feel good enough with 96Khz.
Modern DACs now have support for 384/32, so even supporting 192KHz wi
michael123;633264 Wrote:
> As far as I know, clocks are OK and the circuitry is fine (we modded
> Transporter twice, replaced output stage, replaced two clocks, modded
> transformers, added power supplies for clocks, some more capacitors for
> the power supply).
> There are two clocks, which are
As far as I know, clocks are OK and the circuitry is fine (we modded
Transporter twice, replaced output stage, replaced two clocks, modded
transformers, added power supplies for clocks, some more capacitors for
the power supply).
DAC is fine as well
CPU is weak and cannot carry the bitstream of
michael123;633255 Wrote:
> hardware?
yes - the TP clocks and supporting circuitry cannot run at 192
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/XP) - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103
- full
hardware?
--
michael123
Michael
michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=87939
_
On 05/25/2011 07:48 PM, Phil Leigh wrote:
> You need to grow a sense of humour.
>
> You just make yourself look silly with comments like this.
+1.
R.
--
"Feed that ego and you starve the soul" - Colonel J.D. Wilkes
http://www.theshackshakers.com/
___
tank121;633249 Wrote:
> Speaker brackets are being mounted at 5ft so speakers will fall below
> this.
>
> How far from the side walls ?
what is the width of the room and how far away are you sitting?
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what
Speaker brackets are being mounted at 5ft so speakers will fall below
this.
How far from the side walls ?
--
tank121
tank121's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17169
View this thread: http://forums
Curt962;633235 Wrote:
> I'm looking forward to getting back to my work domicile where I can try
> out my new AudioLense 2.0!Despite my disappointing experience with
> DRC (using another software method) I really think that DRC is, or at
> least could be the beauty of computer based audio.
>
http://photobucket.com/Tank121garageConversion
--
tank121
tank121's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17169
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=85319
___
soundcheck;633222 Wrote:
> I love your cynism. Why don't you just stay out of this thread. You got
> the Toolbox installed and keep sneaking around to poison the
> atmosphere.
>
> You know - weired people like you keep me back me from releasing TT30.
> ...
Klaus, What IS your problem? - it was
This is a hardware issue, not a firmware issue... and no, it can't be
done.
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/XP) - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103
- full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK14
I'm looking forward to getting back to my work domicile where I can try
out my new AudioLense 2.0!Despite my disappointing experience with
DRC (using another software method) I really think that DRC is, or at
least could be the beauty of computer based audio.
Just playing around with the AL s
Thanks for the explanation. Wonder whether the digital mod should
potentially turn off the sound affects (and stop the unecessary process
as you say) as well as muting the other outputs just to ensure that the
crackles do not appear? Easy enough to do oneself but it is not part
of the explanatio
Its not possible.
--
bhaagensen
bhaagensen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7418
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=87939
___
soundcheck;633222 Wrote:
> If people would read and follow my blog properly they would have turned
> off internal sounds prior to installing the toolbox.
Whilst I agree that people can be too cynical about such things and
their comments are unhelpful to those of us that do want to try things
out,
Phil Leigh;633085 Wrote:
> ... the screen that is turned off by the mods :-)
I love you cynism. Why don't you just stay out of this thread. You got
the Toolbox installed and keep sneaking around to poison the
atmosphere.
You know - weired people like you keep me back me from releasing TT30.
Ba
Done. Log.txt says everything is 48K to the Boom now.Can't hear a
bleedin' bit of difference. :)Mostly just using Momma's Boom as a
guinea pig this week anyway..just to make sure I have Inguz working
properly on this PC which thus far...it seems to be.
Best thing about Inguz is the FREE
Assuming it is a limitation of Transporter's processing power, can we
relax the fw a bit to support 24/192 WAV or AIFF? Or FLAC with lesser
compression level?
PS - title should read "Any way"
--
Kuro
Kuro's Profile: http
26 matches
Mail list logo
