No, no, no, not on the iPad, dear me, no, good Lord, it's not a computer you
know, it's a Peripheral Device. You can't have USB ports on a Peripheral
Device. It's not natural. No, if you want USB ports you need a computer, and
for that you need - it's the only word for it - a Macbook Air. I'd go
Phil Leigh;661987 Wrote:
> It is less likely to happen if competitors such as Kindle Fire support
> Flash.
Err... Don't know how much you've read about the Kindle Fire. From what
_I_ hear compared to the restrictions Amazon is applying by default the
iPad will look like a libertarian's dream com
Phil Leigh;661987 Wrote:
> Let the customer decide their own destiny.
ROTFLMAO - when has Apple EVER let the customer decide ANYTHING!
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels -> Snatch -> The Transporter ->
Transporter 2 (oops) -> Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
MCR,
Why so many remasters sound so poor is clear to my mind: dynamic range
compression. IME the original CD releases tend to be less dynamically
compressed than the newer remasters. I tend to go for the original
release first and I will buy a remaster only if I can compare.
I don't have experien
I've been exposed recently to a number of the so-called 'paper sleeve'
Japanese remastered/repackaged CDs (courtesy of a friend). I was
skeptical at first, thinking that it's just an eye candy, but
boy-oh-boy do these CDs sound way superior to their Wester
counterparts.
A case in point: Dire Stra
ralphpnj;661985 Wrote:
> Perhaps I didn't explain myself very clearly when I wrote that "content
> is worthless" because I don't mean that the content has no value, be it
> music, video, books or software, but rather that because of the ease of
> copying and ability to quickly distribute those co
Phil Leigh;661980 Wrote:
> My point was that there has to be something worth accessing... Otherwise
> no one makes Any money.
Perhaps I didn't explain myself very clearly when I wrote that "content
is worthless" because I don't mean that the content has no value, be it
music, video, books or sof
Reckon so, there's no attenuation in the digital domain at least.
Is the polarity inversion setting common across all TP sources or just
for streamed input?
--
amcluesent
amcluesent's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.c
ralphpnj;661057 Wrote:
> I beg to differ: Apple doesn't hasn't forgotten that content is king
> rather they understand full well that content is worthless and realize
> that easy access to content is the real King. The iTunes, iBook and
> iApp stores are perfect examples of places where access to
amcluesent;661975 Wrote:
> I'm comparing CDs played on my Stello CDT200 connected to the
> Transporter via AES\EBU with the same CD ripped using EAC to FLAC and
> streamed.
>
> The Stello\Transporter as external DAC sounds better, more 'air' etc.
> :)
>
> Most peculiar...
Perfectly level match
I'm comparing CDs played on my Stello CDT200 connected to the
Transporter via AES\EBU with the same CD ripped using EAC to FLAC and
streamed.
The Stello\Transporter as external DAC sounds better, more 'air' etc.
:)
Most peculiar...
--
amcluesent
---
mjock3;661122 Wrote:
> Is there no one willing to give me a hand on this? Could it be my
> firmware updated? Is anyone using 7.6.1 r9486 and hearing changes on
> the fly with the spdif settings?
Not sure what you mean by "on the fly with the spdif settings." chrt
immediately changes a process r
Thanks Frank
--
MCG555
Greetings from Switzerland - Markus :-)
Proac Response D15, Astintrew AT2000plus, SB Touch
MCG555's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37801
View this thread: http://foru
The coax inputs (and USB input) of the Rega DAC are also isolated (at
least 'according to Rega' (http://www.rega.co.uk/html/DAC.htm)) so it
shouldn't be a problem.
--
Soulkeeper
-that is not dead which can eternal lie. and with strange aeons even
death may die.-
touch (sans caps) + duet + boom
Phil Leigh;661835 Wrote:
> The TOSLINK will not interfere with the coax BUT the coax provides an
> electrical connection and the whole benefit of TOSLINK is to remove
> that connection and provide galvanic isolation!
> So... Only connect one cable.
Hope this is only when connecting from an outpu
Phil Leigh;661835 Wrote:
> The TOSLINK will not interfere with the coax BUT the coax provides an
> electrical connection and the whole benefit of TOSLINK is to remove
> that connection and provide galvanic isolation!
> So... Only connect one cable.
Thanks, Phil. Much appreciated.
--
rgro
Rg
castalla;661484 Wrote:
> - quote
>
> If you can get one for £20-£30 I'd say it was worth it.
>
> - unquote
>
> Worth it, in what way ? Did you do a blind test with a 5 quid cable?
What I meant was: for that money it is worth - in my opinion - picking
one up and trying it for yourself to see
17 matches
Mail list logo
