For those who wish to try it, here is the /usr/bin/tt config for all
non-essential processes stopped but factory priority values for those
that remain.
To be used with TT3.0 using following settings:
-v
-b 2
-k for after the settings file is edited.
tt file settings:
PIDJIVEALSA=`pidof jive
Stilly77;680897 Wrote:
> SBGK..you no longer have any credibility with me.
>
> You've moved your settings all over the place the last week and keep
> proclaiming every one as best.
>
> At this point, your claims don't carry much weight and are no better
> than anyone that has ever made a tw
TheOctavist;680905 Wrote:
> ok...how to reinstate TT 3.0 stock??
Original values i tt-file:
PIDJIVEALSA=`pidof jive_alsa` #def: 45
#PIDJIVE=`pidof jive` #def: -
PIDSIRQTASKLET0=`pidof sirq-tasklet/0` #def: 89 interrupt handler -
should be higher then interrupts
PID
ok...how to reinstate TT 3.0 stock??
tt -i says it is already initialized. I want to enable the priority mod
which it says is disabled..
going to try that with the buffer at 20k
--
TheOctavist
Vortexbox>SBT(TT 3.0/SBGK)>>Forssell MDAC-2>>>Klein and Hummell 0300D
Sota Sapphire/Lyra Kleos>>Be
SBGK..you no longer have any credibility with me.
You've moved your settings all over the place the last week and keep
proclaiming every one as best.
At this point, your claims don't carry much weight and are no better
than anyone that has ever made a tweak of the SBT.
keep up the blah, bla
RGibran;680886 Wrote:
> The buffer has been at 3400 since TT 2.0, because it sounds better
> there. You know it does, but you tune your system to your taste and
> listening level by increasing it, only to once again move away from
> true 'improved sound'. Why not try moving your speakers out aw
The buffer has been at 3400 since TT 2.0, because it sounds better
there. You know it does, but you tune your system to your taste and
listening level by increasing it, only to once again move away from
true 'improved sound'. Why not try moving your speakers out away from
the wall a few more inc
guidof;680858 Wrote:
> SBGK:
>
> I think that with your latest settings you're on to something.
>
> I tried the SBT priorities + TT3.0 + Buffer 2 and my first
> impression is that the music is presented more naturally; the flow is
> more effortless; there is greater detail, but without losi
cfraser;680871 Wrote:
> I still like your original (i.e. not there anymore) p48 settings.
> Unfortunately they have that burr in the HFs (here). There's no way I
> can relate those settings to any of the more current ones...thought I
> could keep the good parts and tune out the bad...my life will
SBGK;680823 Wrote:
> ...but I don't think the overall musical sound has been improved by
> tweaking the priorities and buffers.
I still like your original (i.e. not there anymore) p48 settings.
Unfortunately they have that burr in the HFs (here). There's no way I
can relate those settings to any
lake_eleven;680848 Wrote:
> Oh, so how to get to this base(OOTB) setting. Is it to just change the
> tt file with a new set of values. Can someone pls give those default
> settings.
try post 855, previous page
--
SBGK
SB
SBGK:
I think that with your latest settings you're on to something.
I tried the SBT priorities + TT3.0 + Buffer 2 and my first
impression is that the music is presented more naturally; the flow is
more effortless; there is greater detail, but without losing the
music's gestalt and drive.
I
rgro;680850 Wrote:
> Guido---just curious, have you tried the GuidoF settings with the buffer
> size set to 2?
Yes, I have. The results were not encouraging.
However, I also tried the latest (01-01-2012?) SBGK's.
Initial impression in my next post.
Guido F.
--
guidof
MUSIC ROOM:
Maran
guidof;680822 Wrote:
> Actually, as I mentioned in a prior post, I too found the bass somewhat
> heavy upon first trying both TT3.0 and your settings. However, in my
> system all I had to do was to back down a bit on my sub's volume (the
> crossover is already at its minimum of 30Hz) and everythi
RGibran;680824 Wrote:
> Bingo! Exactly the reason I'm sticking with them.
>
> Can I get an AMEN? :-)
>
> Happy New Year everyone...
>
> RG
Oh, so how to get to this base(OOTB) setting. Is it to just change the
tt file with a new set of values. Can someone pls give those default
settings.
--
Hello,
I also have a Trivista DAC which I have been happily using for the last
6 years. I have recently tried a few more modern DACS, including Naim,
and have not found one that is the equal of my Trivista. Although
several years old, the DAC used in the Trivista is a 24 bit 96/192KHz
which is abl
In principle, and especially if you are ready to spend up to £3000, I
would recommend going the new DAC route over refurbishing a 9-year old
unit. Which one is, of course, a function of your musical tastes as
well as your other equipment.
Good hunting! (Not an entirely bad way to start the new ye
SBGK;680738 Wrote:
> I am going to settle on SBT base settings, hard to beat for sheer
> musicality and emotional involvement with the music.
Bingo! Exactly the reason I'm sticking with them.
Can I get an AMEN? :-)
Happy New Year everyone...
RG
--
RGibran
-
guidof;680818 Wrote:
> Hmm . . . somehow I doubt it.
>
> Actually, I hope you are not!
>
> Guido F.
no really. I am enjoying listening to led zep just now and it sounds v
good.
I am beginning to think that tweaking the SBT is a bit like adjusting
the weight on a record player needle, you can
SBGK;680765 Wrote:
> right, my last modification post, I have found the solution, for me at
> least.
>
> It is SBT out of the box settings with buffer at default of 2 ie tt
> -b 2, now everything sounds correct. of course, this is how it was
> designed to be used. so with TT3.0 the sound
SBGK;680808 Wrote:
>
>
> hope you continue to find improvements, I am finished.
Hmm . . . somehow I doubt it.
Actually, I hope you are not!
Guido F.
--
guidof
MUSIC ROOM:
Marantz TT 15S1 Turntable, Virtuoso Wood Cartridge->Conrad Johnson
Motif preamp
Oppo BDP-83 Universal Player->Cambri
rgro;680761 Wrote:
>
>
> While audiomuze seems to think we're pretentious and silly as hell, I'm
> actually having quite a bit of fun with this.
Well, it's us "phools" who have the big smile on our faces as we revel
in the glorious music of our tweaked (and un-tweaked) systems!
Guido F.
--
NoRoDa;680805 Wrote:
>
> When the same priority setting can be described as dark and mellow by
> some and light and harsh by others, it's a good time to think about how
> much of this is in our heads.
>
> And tomorrow we will have yet another final setting from SBGK. ;)
> Instead of trying out
First of all; all the Best for the New Year 2012.
Exactly NoRoDa - I also already forecast that;
Everyone of us has another plant chain, other source, amplifier and
loudspeakers in its acoustic area (very important subject) and reacts
differently also depending upon kind of the music on the prio
Hello all and happy & prosperous new year wishes to everyone!
My first post here so please be gentle...although I do lurk a lot!
My new year hasn't got off to a brilliant start. My beloved Musical
Fidelity Trivista DAC died this morning after 9 yrs of rock solid
service with the left channel no
SBGK;680795 Wrote:
>
> PRIOJIVEALSA=45
> #PRIOJIVE=0
> PRIOSIRQTASKLET0=89
> PRIOSIRQHRTIMER=40
> PRIOWATCHDOG=99
> PRIOLOADAVG=50
> PRIODOFPSXCPUTMR=98
> PRIOIRQ47=40
> PRIOIRQ14=40
> PRIOIRQ37=40
> PRIOIRQ34=90
> PRIOSIRNETTX=40
> PRIOSIRNETRX=40
>
I believe that it's a fair thing to say tha
bimboy;680791 Wrote:
> I do not understand what you mean 'SBT out of the box settings' as you
> are following this with instructions for TT3.0 settings '...buffer at
> default of 2 ie tt -b 2'
> Do you really mean SBT with TT3.0 rather than out of the box.
> Slightly confused...
TT3.0 th
I do not understand what you mean 'SBT out of the box settings' as you
are following this with instructions for TT3.0 settings '...buffer at
default of 2 ie tt -b 2'
Do you really mean SBT with TT3.0 rather than out of the box.
Slightly confused...
SBGK;680765 Wrote:
> right, my last mo
play at buffer 2, SBT factory settings + SBGK mods, thats all
folks.
PIDJIVEALSA=`pidof jive_alsa` #def: 45
#PIDJIVE=`pidof jive` #def: -
PIDSIRQTASKLET0=`pidof sirq-tasklet/0` #def: 89 interrupt handler -
should be higher then interrupts
PIDSIRQHRTIMER=`pidof si
AndrewFG;679354 Wrote:
> Is there a way to setup the Transporter's volume control so that its
> analog outputs are variable volume but its digital output is fixed (at
> maximum)?
Don't take this as gospel, but I have a hazy recollection that this
used to be possible but the facility was removed a
Stilly77;680773 Wrote:
> I just loaded TT2.0 on top of TT 3.0, ran them through the Umax 22
> super-compiler and set the buffer to 5,675,901..I can't believe
> how good it sounds now!
the new years resolution didn't last long then !!!
--
SBGK
--
I just loaded TT2.0 on top of TT 3.0, ran them through the Umax 22
super-compiler and set the buffer to 5,675,901..I can't believe
how good it sounds now!
--
Stilly77
Stilly77's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices
NoRoDa;680771 Wrote:
> LOL!!! :D :D
>
> [image:
> http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a270/RODARID/HIFI/priosettingstoolbox30122011.jpg]
>
> Good choice, 'cause I won't have to change in my excel sheet ;)
remember the buffer size of 2, it is critical to the default
settings.
--
SBGK
SBGK;680765 Wrote:
> ps this is not a wind up, i really am using these settings
LOL!!! :D :D
[image:
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a270/RODARID/HIFI/priosettingstoolbox30122011.jpg]
Good choice, 'cause I won't have to change in my excel sheet ;)
--
NoRoDa
--
right, my last modification post, I have found the solution, for me at
least.
It is SBT out of the box settings with buffer at default of 2 ie tt
-b 2, now everything sounds correct. of course, this is how it was
designed to be used. so with TT3.0 the sound is cleaned up and we have
the o
35 matches
Mail list logo
