naamanf;690656 Wrote:
> Yup it works! And sounds horrible!
>
> I must have not done such a great job on the correction filter. I used
> the Inguz method with DRC. Is audiolense worth the cheese?
What microphone did you use? You need to use a GOOD flat mic,
preferably one that is calibrated.
Can
Triode;690632 Wrote:
> I think some of the TT mods can be made to work with the approach in the
> blind tester, others which require a reboot can't easily though I am
> willing to consider extending the app so state it persits across
> reboots. However I do think its a valuable way to understand
guidof;690604 Wrote:
> IME it all depends on the low frequency extension of your main speakers
> AND the careful matching of that to the sub's crossover.
>
> It also helps to have a way of taming LF room modes, either by bass
> traps or DSP.
>
> If your sub's crossover is set sufficiently low
darrenyeats;690647 Wrote:
> I was at a Pink Floyd concert (1994 at Earl's Court).
>
> Everything about the sound was incredible, even from half way back in
> the huge arena, high up on one side! One, low distortion: I could hear
> backing singers individually and each instrument distinctly, much
naamanf;690656 Wrote:
> Yup it works! And sounds horrible!
>
> I must have not done such a great job on the correction filter. I used
> the Inguz method with DRC. Is audiolense worth the cheese?
I'm intrigued but also skeptical about something messing with the audio
before. It looks like audio
Phil Leigh;690640 Wrote:
> Changes only happen if you stop/start or change track... It doesnt work
> like a normal "tone control" because of the buffering in the player...
>
> Check the file called log.txt on your LMS server... It should have some
> debug information in there that will confirm w
Phil Leigh;690626 Wrote:
> Mine kicks in at 28hz...
I was at a Pink Floyd concert (1994 at Earl's Court).
Everything about the sound was incredible, even from half way back in
the huge arena, high up on one side! One, low distortion: I could hear
backing singers individually and each instrument
naamanf;690636 Wrote:
> Not to thread jack, but what is the trick to get Inguz to actually
> perform to audio corrections. I'm running LMS 7.7.1 on W7. Everything
> looks like it's working but it doesn't actually change the sound. All
> the test tones work though.
Changes only happen if you stop
Not to thread jack, but what is the trick to get Inguz to actually
perform to audio corrections. I'm running LMS 7.7.1 on W7. Everything
looks like it's working but it doesn't actually change the sound. All
the test tones work though.
--
naamanf
-
Soundman;690607 Wrote:
> It's not suitable to test TT-mods. As Triode writes: "The applet only
> supports changes which can be made on the fly without restarting
> Touch". The TT-mods always require a restart (except for TT -k). Comes
> to it that the TT-mods should be tested all together, which
Mnyb;690624 Wrote:
> I filter my sub at 50hz that's a good compromise to my main speakers
> filter is steep and some DRC DSP is applied, my sub is actually placed
> more like a speaker and not close to boundary( to use that effect) that
> actually makes it easier to blend in but demands more outp
I filter my sub at 50hz that's a good compromise to my main speakers
filter is steep and some DRC DSP is applied, my sub is actually placed
more like a speaker and not close to boundary( to use that effect) that
actually makes it easier to blend in but demands more output from it.
But I rarely pla
sckramer;690015 Wrote:
> Looks like a nice sub!
>
> You should do a pair of subs, if you run a stereo signal into a single
> sub, you can actually get some cancellation--
I agree you can get cancellation between channels but I question
whether two subs will improve things significantly for this
Soundman;690607 Wrote:
> It's not suitable to test TT-mods. As Triode writes: "The applet only
> supports changes which can be made on the fly without restarting
> Touch". The TT-mods always require a restart (except for TT -k). Comes
> to it that the TT-mods should be tested all together, which
I even still like the original sound of the first release. It sounds a
bit thin and you really have to turn it up but it is still one of
better recordings out there.
You may check if you have an early cd version that was sold with
pre-emphasis and apply de-emphasis. Not sure but on several ripping
evdplancke;690599 Wrote:
> The ugly thing therein is that one will again tell that the medium makes
> the difference and wrongly conclude that it's hires that best reproduces
> the good old analog vinyl sound.
Sorry you are absolutely right, I should have said "fortunately, the
mastering on the
wow thanks very much- this is really interesting.
Please say thank you from me. I shall have a good read and properly
digest it before asked any dumb questions back.
--
adamdea
adamdea's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices
Soundman;690607 Wrote:
> It's not suitable to test TT-mods. As Triode writes: "The applet only
> supports changes which can be made on the fly without restarting
> Touch". The TT-mods always require a restart (except for TT -k). Comes
> to it that the TT-mods should be tested all together, which
TheOctavist;690485 Wrote:
> why dont you guys come to the touch forum and participate in Triodes
> blind testing app?
It's not suitable to test TT-mods. As Triode writes: "The applet only
supports changes which can be made on the fly without restarting
Touch". The TT-mods always require a restar
IME it all depends on the low frequency extension of your main speakers
AND the careful matching of that to the sub's crossover.
It also helps to have a way of taming LF room modes, either by bass
traps or DSP.
If your sub's crossover is set sufficiently low (30-40Hz, depending on
slope), one s
Phil Leigh;690585 Wrote:
> Fortunately the DVD-A is rather good.. :-)
The ugly thing therein is that one will again tell that the medium
makes the difference and wrongly conclude that it's hires that best
reproduces the good old analog vynil sound.
--
evdplancke
adamdea;690592 Wrote:
> Is it also necessary to apply your amended plugin.pm and index as per
> the zip file you posted
> http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=633051&postcount=317
Yep! - do that first.
I actually now use a hacked (by me) version of plugin.pm that disables
ALL of the cu
Robb_G;690590 Wrote:
> Phil,
>
> Regarding your point above, is it true that the Touch will sound better
> than the Duet even when feeding an external DAC via optical cable?
>
> The reason I ask is that I have a well regarded DAC (Audio-gd NFB-2)
> that I currently have connected to a Duet rece
Is it also necessary to apply your amended plugin.pm and index as per
the zip file you posted
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=633051&postcount=317
--
adamdea
adamdea's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/m
Phil Leigh;690584 Wrote:
> Please note that the Touch without TT sounds better than the Duet
> anyway.
Phil,
Regarding your point above, is it true that the Touch will sound better
than the Duet even when feeding an external DAC via optical cable?
The reason I ask is that I have a well regarde
sckramer;690015 Wrote:
> Looks like a nice sub!
>
> You should do a pair of subs, if you run a stereo signal into a single
> sub, you can actually get some cancellation--
You guys are evil. :)
--
Jeff Flowerday
Jeff Fl
Soulkeeper;690569 Wrote:
> Talking about Dire Straits, it was AB listening to Brothers in Arms that
> once had me convinced that vinyl was vastly superior to CD. It took a
> while before I understood that it wasn't the medium, it was the War On
> Sound.
>
> Still can't bring myself to listen to
mrbanks;690512 Wrote:
> Is there a version for Squeezebox Duet?
>
> //Thanks
No. The Duet uses proprietary firmware on its XILINX chip and cannot be
easily hacked. Even if it could, the TT changes are not relevant to the
Duet hardware/firmware. Please note that the Touch without TT sounds
bette
adamdea;690559 Wrote:
> Will do.
> As I understand it the custom convert file was to make everything get
> converted to a single format 24/96 flac by sox prior to inguz.
> You can do it using a text editor to insert your mac address into phils
> file.
>
> I'm sure phil can explain better.
This
Archimago;690548 Wrote:
> LOL, hilarious interview.
>
> This part is interesting:
> "PQ: It's not a question of digital or analog, because in CD's the
> music is still stored as a continuous, if some what squared, sine wave,
> in the form of ones and zeros. The CD does not break up the signal at
Thanks for the info! ,Much appreciated :)
--
c-eling
c-eling's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48050
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93593
probably no difference but, as all reasonably good digital sources sound
the same:
HTPC depends on the audio sound system of your OS investigate asio
drivers and kernel streaming and similar issues if it is windows. sound
quality can depend on computer performance OS may re-sample or invoke
volum
Talking about Dire Straits, it was AB listening to Brothers in Arms that
once had me convinced that vinyl was vastly superior to CD. It took a
while before I understood that it wasn't the medium, it was the War On
Sound.
Still can't bring myself to listen to the CD, though. It sounds like
the dr
I doubt that anyone here has done a comparison on -your- system ... ;p
So I think you'll have to try it out for yourself. But if you're using
an external DAC (like the Onkyo's) for both the SB Touch and the HTPC,
don't expect much of a difference sound-wise.
--
Soulkeeper
'Bug 17797: Updating
mrbanks;690512 Wrote:
> Is there a version for Squeezebox Duet?
>
> //Thanks
No.
The reciever part is not open source ,squeezeplay and squeezeos run
only on the controller in duet.
The os of the Reciever is some kind of propriotary ubicom ip3k stuff ??
who knows how that work.
--
Mnyb
---
TheOctavist;690498 Wrote:
> jesus, how do I change the custom convert files? where are the
> directions? what does this do?
>
> have not done the AL yet...will shortly. moving my KH speakers in here
> first..
>
> btw, Adam, why dont you participate in Triodes blind listening app(in
> the touch
I was thinking about the topic.
Why there is no more thorough deconstruction of specific
products/claims.
1. The level of disinformation is close to 100% almost the whole audio
press are into to the scam or fooled by it, you cant get through. so it
is futile to even try
2. The claims by voodoo
37 matches
Mail list logo
