Mnyb wrote:
> Not iTunes ,music can be aviable as lossles someplace else AND as lossy
> on iTunes at the same time .
Sure there are various websites where lossless music can be legally
purchased, such as HDTracks, Bandcamp and sites run by various artists
and record labels, but I believe that th
ralphpnj wrote:
> iTunes has true lossless (and not simply high bit rate lossy) content
> available for purchase and download? Surely you must be joking. I need
> solid proof. It's not that I doubt you, rather I simply think that you
> are mistaken.
Not iTunes ,music can be aviable as lossles so
Mnyb wrote:
> I Go for nr 3 , there are examples of content aviable as lossles and
> iTunes so 2 can not be valid...
iTunes has true lossless (and not simply high bit rate lossy) content
available for purchase and download? Surely you must be joking. I need
solid proof. It's not that I doubt you
ralphpnj wrote:
> Three reasons that I can think of:
>
> 1) The record companies are afraid that making lossless files available
> will somehow increase piracy even though CDs can be easily ripped into
> lossless files and made available for illegal download through all the
> usual methods.
>
>
Thank you for the information.
Is there a simple SP strip that is made out of very high quality
materials?
Ikabob's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32088
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevic
HeadBanger wrote:
> So what are the reasons why record companies usually won't make lossless
> downloads available alongside the lossy? They must have their reasons -
> anyone know?
Three reasons that I can think of:
1) The record companies are afraid that making lossless files available
will s
aubuti wrote:
> +1
> Monster also has a history of overly-aggressive and anti-competitive
> business practices, such as this attempt to intimidate Blue Jeans Cable
> (which I happen to think is a very respectable brand, unlike Monster):
> http://www.audioholics.com/news/industry-news/blue-jeans-s
So what are the reasons why record companies usually won't make lossless
downloads available alongside the lossy? They must have their reasons -
anyone know?
HeadBanger's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?us
toby10 wrote:
> Monster brand anything is generally considered over hyped & over priced.
+1
Monster also has a history of overly-aggressive and anti-competitive
business practices, such as this attempt to intimidate Blue Jeans Cable
(which I happen to think is a very respectable brand, unlike Mon
Monster brand anything is generally considered over hyped & over priced.
Certainly with their cables one can buy equal (if not better) build
quality cables elsewhere at a fraction of the price, sometimes 1/20th
the price. I can only assume the same is true with their surge
suppressors, though I h
After several recommendations from several electricians I adopted the
"two tier" approach to surge protection as is outlined in this article:
http://www.thisoldhouse.com/toh/article/0,,387874,00.html
1. Whole House Surge Suppression: at the main electric panel (usually
$60 to $200 installed dep
audiomuze wrote:
> i'd not be at all surprised if it was found that the overwhelming
> majority of music piracy is carried out by teens and people in their
> 20's and the pirated content is the mindless drivel/ disposable crap i
> refer to above - it is after all stuff that has little to no artis
12 matches
Mail list logo
