And if you are using sync ,your least capable player sets the limit as
all synced players uses the same stream.
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevice
SB3 supports 44.1 and 48. Natively the Touch supports 44.1, 48, 88.2 and
96. There is an applet for the Touch called EDO (Enhanced Digital
Output) which will pass 176.4 and 192 on the digital outs, AND allows
you to connect a USB DAC to the Touch and will go up to 192 if the DAC
supports that over
Wombat wrote:
> Am i right that between your DAC and amplifier you use a Cary Audio
> SLP-05 with Tube?
Yes. I had the SLP-98 tube pre before (now in storage) and the SLP-05
tube pre, fully balanced and with tube power supply, does live up to its
world class reputation. So my system is all Car
jh901 wrote:
> That list is not comprehensive or "official". I'm sure we have members
> here who prefer to believe that the Transporter is the best DAC ever and
> if you are satisfied, then I have no argument. As for others looking
> for far superior sound quality in all areas (transparency, fr
agillis wrote:
> LMS has logic that knows the max resolution of each player attached to
> it. If you try to play a file that is higher then the max sample rate of
> the player LMS will down sample it and send the player a version that is
> at it's max rate. The Touch can send 24/96 out its SPDIF
LMS has logic that knows the max resolution of each player attached to
it. If you try to play a file that is higher then the max sample rate of
the player LMS will down sample it and send the player a version that is
at it's max rate. The Touch can send 24/96 out its SPDIF port
unaltered.
If you
Is there a wiki somewhere that talks about high HD files are handled?
Clearly, the SB Touch has a DAC in there that allows it to handle
everything up to 92kHz, it seems.
The other units will ultimately downsample?
Furthermore, if I play a 24bit/92kHz file via an SB3 that is optically
conntected
Yes, I'm using Transporter as a "network music player" and files are
stored on a ReadyNAS. I use the Cary analog outputs in this case and,
with my current gear, the sound quality compared to the Transporter
analog outs is night and day. So much so that my non-audiophile
neighbor simply couldn't
jh901 wrote:
> The top digital players are manufactured by dCS and their "ring DAC" is
> pretty much the king. For redbook only, the Naim CD-555 is world class.
> Those and many, many other players (excluding the many outboard DACs)
> have sound quality that will surpass the sound quality of the
pkfox wrote:
> Hi there, I notice in your signature you have 'Transporter as a server'
> , would you mind explaining how you use it and what kind of server it is
> ? As I said I've been away for a while.
>
> Kind regards
I'm sure he means that the Transporter is the network music player
(i.e.,
I didn´t look up all devices jh901 listed but on first sight none of
them can serve as streamer for your digital music collection as the
Transporter does. I doubt the Transporter will be considered as good
enough transport for all these DACs even ;)
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
