The standard digital optical out from SB3 and duet is a standard sized
toslink correct? Not a mini? How tightly is it supposed to fit? On both
my SB3 and duet it just kind of sits there and falls out easily, this is
with the house shape upside down, it doesn't seem to fit in any other
way.
-
toby10 wrote:
> I think you would be hard pressed to hear any difference between the SB3
> and Receiver, pretty much same audio architecture. The SB3 display can
> be completely dimmed (set to OFF while playing) if you honestly feel it
> hampers audio quality.
Agree 100%.
-
Before I had the Touch I had the SB3, I used both into different DACs,
all connected with coax.
Compared to the Touch in all cases the SB3 sounded duller, less clear,
less detailed.
The difference was clearly audible to my ears, I was amazed at the
difference two related digital sources could mak
I am using Transporter to play streaming but I also use the DAC for an
external source.
This all is controled via a harmony remote control. But it requires
several keystrokes to flip from one to the other.
Is there a way to store the Digital Input as a favorite? Or can the
choice for digital input
jezbo wrote:
> How about the duet receiver? Will that have a cleaner signal path to the
> digital out than an SB3, comparable with the Touch? At least that won't
> have any possible interference from display circuitry.
I think you would be hard pressed to hear any difference between the SB3
and
gorman wrote:
> Ok, I'm not following. If coaxial can do 24/192 and optical 24/96, why
> the limit to 24/48 (which, by the way, for everything I've read so far
> might not be that much of a limit, as I've always understood the the 24
> bit precision is more important than sample rate)?
the signa
Ok, I'm not following. If coaxial can do 24/192 and optical 24/96, why
the limit to 24/48 (which, by the way, for everything I've read so far
might not be that much of a limit, as I've always understood the the 24
bit precision is more important than sample rate)?
---
