JJZolx wrote:
> What makes you think that's my point of view?
Mainly the stuff you write.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
-
What I thought.
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=102330
___
audiophiles maili
JJZolx wrote:
> Try posting the same to a real audiophile forum and see the response you
> get. Isn't that where you can do the most good, and save the most souls?
I think it's best to let you answer your own question:
JJZolx wrote:
> I just see you trying to make the same point in countless u
Try posting the same to a real audiophile forum and see the response you
get. Isn't that where you can do the most good, and save the most souls?
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View thi
Julf wrote:
> So how about your point of view? What makes you think there is a
> correlation between price and sound quality? Or is your point that sound
> quality doesn't matter - what matters is the price of your system?
> Sounds sad...
What makes you think that's my point of view? I'm just ti
JJZolx wrote:
> Oh, good. Say it again for anyone who missed your last 200 posts on the
> subject.
Oh you can bet that I will keep on saying it, over and over, every time
one of the various high end audio rags, oops I meant magazines,
publishes a ridiculous review of some high priced piece equip
JJZolx wrote:
> Oh, good. Say it again for anyone who missed your last 200 posts on the
> subject.
So how about your point of view? What makes you think there is a
correlation between price and sound quality? Or is your point that sound
quality doesn't matter - what matters is the price of your
JJZolx wrote:
> In other words, the people who agree with you are the people who already
> agree with you.
>
> Post it again tomorrow. I'm sure you'll get the same crowd with their
> +1s tomorrow. And the next day. And the next. It never seems to get old
> with people who agree with each other.
Oh, good. Say it again for anyone who missed your last 200 posts on the
subject.
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=102330
In other words, the people who agree with you are the people who already
agree with you.
Post it again tomorrow. I'm sure you'll get the same crowd with their
+1s tomorrow. And the next day. And the next. It never seems to get old
with people who agree with each other.
-
JJZolx wrote:
> I just see you trying to make the same point in countless useless posts.
I beg to differ - the posts are far from useless judging simply by the
number of people who formerly identified themselves as audiophiles now
agreeing wholeheartedly with my truthful assessment of the sad st
ralphpnj wrote:
> After all this time Zolx you still do not appear to get the point mos of
> us are trying to make.
I just see you trying to make the same point in countless useless posts.
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.
JJZolx wrote:
> How generous of you.
After all this time Zolx you still do not appear to get the point mos of
us are trying to make.
Basically none of us have a problem with well heeled audiophiles
spending large sums of money on fancy looking and to large extent very
nice sounding equipment si
ralphpnj wrote:
> So if one wants to pay for a nice looking piece of equipment by all
> means go ahead
How generous of you.
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://for
JJZolx wrote:
> I wish I had more money too. Those bastards with so much money that they
> can buy nice stuff are just ... -stoopid-.
Julf wrote:
> Luckily I have gotten to a point in my life where I have been able to
> afford some pretty expensive toys (cars, motorcycles, electronics etc.),
>
Julf wrote:
> Luckily I have gotten to a point in my life where I have been able to
> afford some pretty expensive toys (cars, motorcycles, electronics etc.),
> but I don't see any point in paying for just a nice box and some silly
> marketing.
Good for you. I have an very rich uncle who drives
JJZolx wrote:
> I wish I had more money too. Those bastards with so much money that they
> can buy nice stuff are just ... -stoopid-.
Luckily I have gotten to a point in my life where I have been able to
afford some pretty expensive toys (cars, motorcycles, electronics etc.),
but I don't see any
I wish I had more money too. Those bastards with so much money that they
can buy nice stuff are just ... -stoopid-.
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimde
Julf wrote:
> A bunch of companies do, but their products are not taken seriously by
> audiophiles.
More importantly these companies and their products must first be taken
seriously by the clowns who write and edit the various high end audio
magazines and e-zines. Since most of these companies a
ralphpnj wrote:
> My guess is that there is now a very big opportunity for someone to come
> along and offer well made, lower priced but still great sounding audio
> equipment without the fancy "audiophile approved" finishes.
A bunch of companies do, but their products are not taken seriously by
After I started this thread I thought a little more about the high cost
of some of the audiophile approved finishes that are seen on many pieces
of high end audio equipment, such as the (in)famous "front panel milled
from a solid billet of aircraft-grade aluminum", and came to the
realization that
probedb wrote:
>
>
> It's why I left avforums, they were reviewing the Chord Electronics Hugo
> DAC which is over £1000the review said it had it's own "sound". If
> you're paying £1000 for a DAC and it's colouring the sound then it's a
> pretty bad product if you ask me!
+1 But how else to
I actually have no problem if they want to charge lots of money for the
finish, just like people that like gold plated iPods and the like :)
Then it's for people who like bling.
But, yes, if it's a lot of money and saying it's because it sounds so
awesome then I guess audiophiles must have their
23 matches
Mail list logo
