I am interested in the Transporter if you still have it. Somehow, I
cannot PM, maybe because I am new?
ym
ymw's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=63531
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com
Julf wrote:
> I agree - and of course 32 bit floating point must be better than 24 bit
> integer, as more is better...
Only if it is DSD.
Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power amps-Vandersteen 3A Sign. &
sub
Home Theater: Touch-Marantz HTR-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Linn sub
Computer Rm: Touch-
ralphpnj wrote:
> As I just responded to probedb, yes it was meant as a joke but it is
> really hard to make a joke about something that it is itself one big
> joke. While you and many other of my fellow forum members might
> instantly recognize the joke, unfortunately most audiophiles would not
Julf wrote:
> I am assuming the whole posting was 100% joke/irony.
As I just responded to probedb, yes it was meant as a joke but it is
really hard to make a joke about something that it is itself one big
joke. While you and many other of my fellow forum members might
instantly recognize the jok
probedb wrote:
> Except you know that a dB scale isn't linear so 96 isn't double 48
> afaik. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decibel
>
> I do hope the part about 16/24/32 was a joke.
Sure it was a joke but similar nonsense has been printed in the high end
audio press and no matter how many times i
probedb wrote:
> I do hope the part about 16/24/32 was a joke.
I am assuming the whole posting was 100% joke/irony.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" -
ralphpnj wrote:
> Amazingly no one has yet mentioned that in order for a recording with a
> highly compressed dynamic range to sound good one MUST obtain a 24 bit
> version (or even a 32 bit version) since those extra 8 bits provide for
> approximately 50% more dynamic range (16 bit audio - 96 dB
cliveb wrote:
> I agree that appropriate compression is often necessary and has been
> used for decades on rock and pop as a way of bringing recordings to
> life. (Jazz as well, I dare say). But what started in the early 1990's
> and has been getting worse ever since is *excessive* compression.
darrenyeats wrote:
> I used to rail against all compression but sometimes it's fitting, if
> done well, in certain genres. It's not welcome necessarily, but it
> doesn't spell ruin. Especially if certain elements in the mix are
> compressed and others not. If Busta Rhymes bass kicks and Two Door
Good point.
Check it, add to it! http://www.dr.loudness-war.info/
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/richpub/listmania/byauthor/A3H57URKQB8AQO/ref=cm_pdp_content_listmania/203-7606506-5721503.
SB Touch
darrenyeats's Profile: htt
Hi guys,
in the meantime I´ve bought another Transporter, this time in black und
with TRANSPORTER on the front plate.
I´m selling the silver one since my other equipment is in black.
Guess what I saw, when opening the case of the black one?
*V 2.3*
I then compared both versions in regard to the P
They are the screws which pop up directly when the link opens up and it
is the size UNC 4-40.
In German they are called Senkkopf-Schrauben mit Innensechskant, ähnlich
DIN 7991, Edelstahl A2
which means Allen-Key, similar to DIN 7991 (industrial standard size),
stainless steel.
Cheers
Kai
-
12 matches
Mail list logo
