Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Oh-oh, the ethernet/USB cable dispute all over again ...

2014-12-08 Thread Julf
Archimago wrote: > IAnd if truly some people refuse to even agree at this basic level, > fruitful discussion is likely impossible. Unfortunately confirmation bias seems to be a rather strong force... "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'hi

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Oh-oh, the ethernet/USB cable dispute all over again ...

2014-12-08 Thread Archimago
cliveb wrote: > As I read the response that you posted here, I was struck by the thought > that you seemed to be bending over backwards to try and avoid offense. > > Had it been me commenting on the CA article, it would have been > something more along the lines of "there is no rational explanat

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Oh-oh, the ethernet/USB cable dispute all over again ...

2014-12-08 Thread Archimago
ralphpnj wrote: > > ... > At this point I don't believe that The Computer Audiophile is the least > bit willing to go back to being an "outsider", which would happen almost > instantly should The Computer Audiophile ever dare to publish something > free from all the audiophile voodoo, nonsense a

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Oh-oh, the ethernet/USB cable dispute all over again ...

2014-12-08 Thread cliveb
Archimago wrote: > Yup. As of this AM "Your comment is awaiting moderation." Whether they > allow the response to see the light of day I think will be interesting > and speak volumes about the writer and web site. I do believe my > response was reasonably "moderate" and respectful, but clear abou