rkrug01 wrote:
>
> > And then i lately realized that Watermark crap.
> > Your 24/96 qobuz purchase may have the Watermark vermin inside while a
> > standard CD hasn't.
> > https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,98.0.html
> >
> >
> But the same applies to all downloads.
>
>
No, not all dow
Julf wrote:
> Really? Why would you need quality control when everyone will hear a
> night and day difference between "hi-res" and red book? :)
Over the years i was in contact with several persons on the internet and
exchanged samples of typical faults of mp3 coding. There was only one
person i k
Archimago wrote:
> As usual, without decent quality control the whole hi-res thing is a
> fail
Really? Why would you need quality control when everyone will hear a
night and day difference between "hi-res" and red book? :)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
That's just sad. As usual, without decent quality control the whole
hi-res thing is a fail especially when they let stuff like this happen
with watermarking... Upsampled audio, questionable provenance, dynamic
compressed mastering, now watermarking. All when it's questionable even
if well done hi-
