Indeed he knows all the stuff happening out there and comes over really
smart. He must be well educated.
Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA
monoblocks -> Sommer SPK240 -> self-made speakers
Wo
Julf wrote:
> Occasionally some exotic, small-volume speaker manufacturer uses
> audiophile-brand cabling, but if they do, they make sure it gets
> mentioned in every review - and that is the only reason to do it.
My shop-builts have higher-quality wire and everything is
soldered...20377
+
arnyk wrote:
> Guess what, all those supposed sins don't change sound quality, unless
> you are using them as parts of sighted evaluations.
>
> Apparently yet another true believer in magic cables.
I really don't care one way or the other, bad choice of words by me
"bought into it" meant "tried
If I were in the business of high-fidelity, I'm sure I'd be wrestling
with the nasty line between -psychological perception- which sadly is
much of what high-end audio is these days - the promotion of said
perception in service of the need for revenue, sales, the bottom line
and what one must do t
arnyk wrote:
> Juergen Reis is no hero of mine, apparently just another promoter of his
> viewpoint with sighted evaluations.
I concur. He is well aware of how people discuss in the days of the
internet and so takes the scientific route plus a fine dose of clever
and honest sounding experiences a
sckramer wrote:
> Let me play devils advocate :D
>
> These guys are jerks for selling a cable over 3 figures and faking a
> demo. Their cables are butt ugly anyway :D
>
> However, know your equipment... if there are internal patch cables, or
> computer cdrom audio patch cables (remember those)
Archimago wrote:
> I know it's total click bait because the site really doesn't have
> anything new to offer/say, but check out this post:
> http://www.audiostream.com/content/just-2-comments
>
> Gee... Anyone wonder that maybe there are no comments sometimes because
> the people who might want
