Archimago wrote:
>
> 2. If we strive for the IDEAL - then good equipment that is bit-perfect
> *should* sound inaudible even with this small amount of processing to
> convert ALAC --> WAV or FLAC --> WAV or whatever given the same
> DAC/analogue output system! Like I said before, hearing a diffe
darrell wrote:
> To be clear, let's remember we're talking about the perception of
> differences between FLAC and AIFF, not differences in general. These are
> lossless formats, which means that the bits arriving at your DAC
> (unless, as I said, something in your replay chain is broken) are the
