hich are much closer, and
"brighter" and louder), but I buy the 30 Gallery seats.
--
R Johnson
R Johnson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=36462
View this thread: http://forum
ver, I
could hear that choral passages were better articulated on the better
sound track. The audio improvements were subtle. The video improvements
were very evident.
--
R Johnson
R Johnson's Profile: http://forums.s
R Johnson;586258 Wrote:
> ...They play fine with VLC and on the Touch. As I've learned to expect,
> audible differences were too subtle for me to readily detect. ...
I wanted mention that I finally found a nice way of doing A-B
comparisons of two tracks at different "quality&quo
at both in Audacity.
The spectrum plot of the high res version showed content well past the
limits of 16/44.1.
The low res version looked like all loud noise to Audacity.
--
R Johnson
R Johnson's Profile: http://forums
Ditto.
Just noise here.
--
R Johnson
R Johnson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=36462
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=
- a simple 4.0 setup gives remarkably good results. (Of course
this is heresy, but...)
Naturally HD sources like a Blu-ray player are very desirable.
--
R Johnson
R Johnson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/mem
e in my mailbox
one of these days with your front cover review of the Touch.
--
R Johnson
R Johnson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=36462
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.co
As I've explored the "Better-Than-CD" world, I'm coming to the
conclusion that the quality improvements are really not very
significant, at least for me. The FAR more significant aspect is the
RECORDING itself -- performance, venue, microphone techniques,
e I do:
I think that these tracks are well recorded (based on listening).
They are not dynamically compressed or clipped (based on Audacity
inspection).
--
R Johnson
R Johnson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/me
La Serenissima.
I'll try to report tomorrow.
--
R Johnson
R Johnson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=36462
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.c
1 MP3.
If that's typical, an easy choice -- I'll stick with 16/44.1 ...
--
R Johnson
R Johnson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=36462
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.c
uld download and listen to?
Well that will take me a day or two. Assuming I can hear any
differences. Maybe someone else will make suitable suggestions first.
But I will tell you not to try tracks 6 and 7.
--
R Johnson
R
ome tracks show frequency well beyond 19 or 22KHz. But after a smooth
decline, there's often a hump in the 30s that seems most peculiar. Some
other tracks appear to be filtered to 44.1 sample rates.
Listening tests later...
nd options. I'm
downloading the 24/88.2 sampler now. I'll get their 16/44.1 version
too. For $10 plus $6, a very reasonably priced experiment.
--
R Johnson
R Johnson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.co
system for
more revealing tests.
--
R Johnson
R Johnson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=36462
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=81634
___
Thanks Phil!
Looks they offer a nice sampler
http://www.linnrecords.com/recording-the-super-audio-collection-volume-4.aspx
--
R Johnson
R Johnson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=36462
t;Yes", is it worth extra
money for the 'HD' download? How much money?
I'm simply looking for sample downloads to answer those questions. I
want to compare apple-HD to apple-CD not apple-HD to orange-CD.
--
R Johnson
---
teresting
question of whether the HD track was REALLY HD. See
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74688 (a rather large
thread)...
I'm still looking for classical comparison samples.
--
R Johnson
R Johnson&#
RonM;568624 Wrote:
> This is on "Home Theater and High Fidelity". Originally posted in the
> general discussion area.
>
> http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/digital-analog-converters/879-logitech-squeezebox-touch.html?showall=1
>
Thanks for the link! I thought the revie
19 matches
Mail list logo
