some degree, and sometimes to levels that are unappealing
when played on a capably audio system. To what extent can use of an
audio expander undo the work of a dynamic range compressor and restore
life to a compressed recording?
--
bh
.
>
> How do you know?
>
> --Steve
--
bhr1439
----
bhr1439's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=22189
View this thread: http://forums.slim
rted to
analog downstream). Also, the Mark Levinson 360S employs a FIFO buffer
and locally generated clock that obviates the S/PDIF waveform (generated
at the output of the TacT) as a source of clock jitter.
So, no smoking gun yet that confirms or refute my impression, but a
bad. Indeed, it's very good. It's just that I find the sound of music
sourced from SB to be more enjoyable.
The amazing thing about the audiophile hobby is small changes that
"shouldn't make a difference&quo
n my CD player, giving rise to fewer uncorrectable errors
(uncorrectable errors cause the software to "fake it" by throwing the
data out and interpolating across the gap).
Anybody know of comparisons in raw error rate in playback on CD player
vs playback on a computer
