pablolie;232772 Wrote:
> ...mean very little. A high res recording of any kind may still be so
> lousy that it was not worth recording at that quality. I'll take an old
> school, good recording at lower resolutions, hiss and all, if it truly
> ir recorded with musicality and neutrality first in m
...mean very little. A high res recording of any kind may still be so
lousy that it was not worth recording at that quality. I'll take an old
school, good recording at lower resolutions, hiss and all, if it truly
ir recorded with musicality and neutrality first in mind. Technology
comes in a dista
Pale Blue Ego;232598 Wrote:
> Foobar2000 shows the bit depth in the properties sheet of a music file.
> (right-click and choose Properties)
It worked, the file is 24-bit. Thanks.
--
ezkcdude
There are 10 kind of people in the world - those who understand binary
and those who don't.
SHINYMETA
I haven't read or could even probably comprehend them but maybe one of
Lavry's white papers here might help:
http://www.lavryengineering.com/supportpage.html
--
USAudio
SB3 -> PS Audio Digital Link III -> PS Audio Trio C-100 -> Revel
Concerta F12's + SVS SB12-Plus
-
Cool, I have it and I'll try it.
--
ezkcdude
There are 10 kind of people in the world - those who understand binary
and those who don't.
SHINYMETAL
'*Site*' (http://www.ezdiyaudio.com)| '*RSS*'
(http://www2.kumc.edu/students/ezamir/rss/ezdiyaudio.xml) |'*Forum*'
(http://ezdiyaudio.informe.com)
ezkcdude;232438 Wrote:
> I'm wondering whether it is 24-bit or maybe got truncated to 16-bit.
> Does anyone know of a program provides this info? I tried Winamp as
> well (doesn't do it).
Foobar2000 shows the bit depth in the properties sheet of a music file.
(right-click and choose Properties)
IMO the analogy between digital photos and music encoding is
resolution=sample rate and bit depth=er...bit depth!
I think the point is there is a certain photo resolution which is
enough (think about scanning text) and a certain bit-depth that is
enough (think about photo of a landscape where the
ezkcdude;232438 Wrote:
> Does anyone know of a program provides this info? I tried Winamp as well
> (doesn't do it).
The metaflac utility included with the FLAC software can do this.
http://flac.sourceforge.net/download.html
http://members.home.nl/w.speek/flac.htm
http://members.home.nl/w.speek
Thanks, for the responses. You pretty much confirmed what I had been
thinking. So far, I'm quite happy with the H2. The (membrane) buttons
are a little chintzy, so I hope they hold up. For voice (podcast)
recording, I couldn't imagine needing any better. I recorded some
thunder the other night, an
If I had to choose between 24/48 and 16/192 I would definitely choose
24/48. If you think of it in video terms, the higher resolution of a
greater bit-depth lets you capture a more detailed "picture" of each
frame.
Yet there's definitely a case of diminishing returns once the framerate
is suff
Phil Leigh;232394 Wrote:
> Personally in that situation I'd go 24/44.1. That way, any post
> processing that you may want to do (later) can be in true 24-bit.
I'm not a recording engineer. However I agree, having 24 bits for
mastering a recording is probably better. This way you can make
level
Personally in that situation I'd go 24/44.1. That way, any post
processing that you may want to do (later) can be in true 24-bit.
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
...SB3+TACT+Altmann+MF DACXV3/Linn tri-amped Akt
The reason I'm asking is because I want to do some concert recording
with my new Zoom H2 recorder. In order to save space - and thus get
longer recording times - I am planning to go with the 24/44.1 or 24/48
setting, rather than 24/96. But maybe I should just stick with 16/44.1
or 48? The Zoom doe
Evidently even both together don't make an audible difference, so it's
hard to answer your question. In any case I suspect the relevant thing
is the information capacity - which involves a product of bit depth and
sampling frequency. So I'm not sure it's a binary choice like that.
http://forums
So, which rules the roost: 24 bits or 96/192 kHz? If you had to choose
b/w 16/192 and 24/48, which would you choose? Please provide articles
or personal experiences (even if they are not DBT).
--
ezkcdude
There are 10 kind of people in the world - those who understand binary
and those who don'
15 matches
Mail list logo