tufty;698897 Wrote:
> Wasn't the Clever Little Clock review a parody? It gets increasingly
> hard to tell the difference.
Perhaps the TAS Computer Music series was also meant to be a parody.
That would go a long way in explaining some of their errant claims.
Unfortunately I do not think that is
Wasn't the Clever Little Clock review a parody? It gets increasingly
hard to tell the difference.
--
tufty
tufty's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=47700
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.
andy_c;698824 Wrote:
> Their Clever Little Clock was given a
> '_\\"Brutus_Award\\"_by_Positive_Feedback_Online_'
> (http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue28/brutus.htm). The award was
> given by none other than Dave Clark, the guy who coined the "danceable
> cables" expression in reference to t
andy_c;698824 Wrote:
> Their Clever Little Clock was given a
> '_\\"Brutus_Award\\"_by_Positive_Feedback_Online_'
> (http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue28/brutus.htm). The award was
> given by none other than Dave Clark, the guy who coined the "danceable
> cables" expression in reference to t
Their Clever Little Clock was given a
'_Brutus_Award_by_Positive_Feedback_Online_'
(http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue28/brutus.htm). The award was
given by none other than Dave Clark, the guy who coined the "danceable
cables" expression in reference to the infamous Pear Cables :).
--
andy
Geoff Kait makes BlackBody look like Wittgenstein
http://www.machinadynamica.com/machina60.htm
--
TheOctavist
Vortexbox>SBT(stock)>>Forssell MDAC-2>>>Klein and Hummell 0300D
Sota Sapphire/Lyra Kleos>>Bespoke Valve Phono Stage>>Mastersound Due
Venti>>Link Audio K100
--
Owen Smith;698342 Wrote:
> Logitech have a future direction for the Squeezebox? Can't say I'd
> noticed.
he didn't actually reference Squeezebox in terms of logitech's future.
But that's a different thread
--
garym
*Location 1:* VB Appliance 6TB (1.10) > LMS 7.7.1 > Transporter, Touch,
B
DaveWr;698339 Wrote:
> I think that's in direct proportion to Logitech's future direction, new
> players, TVs or whatever. Mindgames expand to fill the dreadful
> silence. It's the ultimate signal to noise ratio!
>
> Dave
Logitech have a future direction for the Squeezebox? Can't say I'd
noti
garym;698306 Wrote:
> yep, pure insanity. I hate those sort of forums where myths become
> truth. The inmates are in charge of the asylum and sane folks are
> treated as crazy. Unfortunately, some of that is creeping in around
> here...
I think that's in direct proportion to Logitech's future di
Ok, PM me when you've got the money. I've got some nylon hose from an
old PSU, and some copper tape leftovers after shielding my Telecaster.
I reckon I can use all that (and some gaffa tape) to make any old set
of USB cables look just terrific. And very, very audiophile-y.
I'll even sell the fin
Me, I'm saving up to buy a few $500/m USB cables... :-)
eric
--
EricBergan
EricBergan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4746
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93549
Soulkeeper;698308 Wrote:
> ... Other than that, it seems we'll just have to let them flop around in
> their magic wonderland of objective subjectivity (or was it the other
> way around), on this forum too. You can lead a brain to thought, but
> you can't make it think.
The catch is with 7 billion
garym;698306 Wrote:
> yep, pure insanity. I hate those sort of forums where myths become
> truth. The inmates are in charge of the asylum and sane folks are
> treated as crazy. Unfortunately, some of that is creeping in around
> here...
The moderators don't want to do anything about it, so the w
Owen Smith;698251 Wrote:
> I've been having that argument over on AVForums in the Oppo 95 EU forum.
> Apparently dbpoweramp sucks and EAC is much better, even if they both
> report accurate rip and produce identical files the EAC one will sound
> *SOOO* much better and I must be insane to be usin
Mnyb;689974 Wrote:
> In that whole series I find their finding that perfect digital copies of
> files sound different the most insane .
I've been having that argument over on AVForums in the Oppo 95 EU
forum. Apparently dbpoweramp sucks and EAC is much better, even if they
both report accurate r
EricBergan;694200 Wrote:
> Ok, I wasn't a big believer in the TAS "sell them anything" conspiracy
> theory. But just got #222. There were two letters to the editor printed
> about the four part story, but both asking for advice on whether they
> should re-rip their FLAC files.
>
> So no question
Ok, I wasn't a big believer in the TAS "sell them anything" conspiracy
theory. But just got #222. There were two letters to the editor printed
about the four part story, but both asking for advice on whether they
should re-rip their FLAC files.
So no questions published about Dr Charles Zellig an
Phil Leigh;694006 Wrote:
> I particularly enjoyed this priceless gem of 6moons hyperbollox...
>
> "... no longer felt assaulted from this powerful computer's radiations
> with its Blutooth mouse and keyboard. Whether this meant wholesale
> elimination of its emissions
Wonder if that means
Mnyb;694010 Wrote:
> You can not know or understand everything in detail yourself if you have
> a legal question you go to a layer if you have question about your
> pension you talk to your banker so we have to make a shortcut and
> select authorities we believe in in certain questions but why on
One mechanism of the human mind is bit of a mystery to me , but of no
mystery to snake oilers.
Where to these jokers writing in TAS authority come from ? Why are
anyone believing these fools over more sane authorities ? they have
found a working concept of playing on our wishful thinking in some
Mnyb;693940 Wrote:
> Yeah but it wont last over time, hence you are in the "upgrade" spiral
>
> What can be mildly irritating as that no one reads the tread it is like
> a Relay race the next audiofool comes along and pose the same already
> answered and done questions without any apparent unde
ralphpnj;693992 Wrote:
> The same comment with one minor change could also be used to describe
> the TAS Computer Music series:
>
> Wow. That is the most impressive professional looking bullshit I've
> ever seen. They really have perfected the art of PUBLISHING snake oil.
Very true.
--
andyn
For a good freakshow note all the weird adds on both avguide (TAS and
hifi+) and stereophiles home pages .
Also lesslos that does the blackbox have some computer audio stuff too
hence a tangent with the topic of fud in computer audio but I simply
did not get further than the blackbox :)
Sorry f
andynormancx;693990 Wrote:
> Wow. That is the most impressive professional looking bullshit I've ever
> seen. They really have perfected the art of selling snake oil.
The same comment with one minor change could also be used to describe
the TAS Computer Music series:
Wow. That is the most impre
andynormancx;693990 Wrote:
> Wow. That is the most impressive professional looking bullshit I've ever
> seen. They really have perfected the art of selling snake oil.
Yes, that is _exactly_ the kind of thing that makes the word
"audiophile" an embarrassment.
--
totoro
sb touch -> classdaudio
Mnyb;693940 Wrote:
>
>
> In the meantime have a blackbody :)
>
> http://www.lessloss.com/blackbody-p-200.html
Wow. That is the most impressive professional looking bullshit I've
ever seen. They really have perfected the art of selling snake oil.
--
andynormancx
Yes, it will. Yes, all of t
darrenyeats;693915 Wrote:
> Guys,
> I think the tone of some of these posts is harsh on Paul. It seems to
> me some frustration about other members or posts is being transferred
> to Paul.
I agree with this. I disagree with Paul. However, unlike item_audio,
magiccarpetride, or ncarver, he didn't
darrenyeats;693915 Wrote:
> guys,
> i think the tone of some of these posts is harsh on paul. It seems to
> me some frustration about other members or posts is being transferred
> to paul.
>
> I agree about the emailed audio files anecdote. This is why an
> understanding of how computers work is
andy_c;693862 Wrote:
> uuencode and base64 sound waaay better than yEnc. :D
Not when the music is jazz. yEnc for jazz, uuencode for rock and
popular and base64 for classical.
Mnyb;693864 Wrote:
> Which font was used on the newsgroup any serifs would add a peculiar
> edge on stuff :D
Serifs do
darrell;693935 Wrote:
>
>
> Such a cable is still a fraud, because the engineering claims made are
> lies, even if the end result is a perception of improved sound in the
> mind of the user.
>
> .
Yeah but it wont last over time, hence you are in the "upgrade"
spiral
What can be mildly irri
darrenyeats;693915 Wrote:
> I think the tone of some of these posts is harsh on Paul. It seems to me
> some frustration about other members or posts is being transferred to
> Paul.
paul.raulerson;693884 Wrote:
> I wasn't ready to dismiss it as swamp gas, because there is a
> possibility that som
Guys,
I think the tone of some of these posts is harsh on Paul. It seems to
me some frustration about other members or posts is being transferred
to Paul.
I agree about the emailed audio files. This is why an understanding of
how computers work is necessary. Those who understand, know there is no
ralphpnj;693842 Wrote:
>
> 1) I ripped a track from a CD into a wav file.
>
> 2) I converted that wav file to a flac file.
>
> 3) I uploaded this flac file to a newsgroup which means that the flac
> file was converted into a yEnc file (a yEnc encoder converts binary
> data, like the data (not
paul.raulerson;693884 Wrote:
> Whoa - who said I was making a case?
Semantics. You ARE making a claim, aren't you?
The point is that if you allow your ears to mislead you into thinking
that rips made with different power supplies sound different, then
providing those rips are bit identical, th
totoro;693725 Wrote:
>
> Not sure that either people are capable in general of detecting
> bullshit, or that it's strictly relevant here
>
> Partially I like to argue for the fun of it. Partially because people
> like item_audio who spew bullshit really annoy me, and I don't see any
> reason wh
paul.raulerson;693887 Wrote:
> Whooo boy. Are you guys really going around the world to get next door.
>
>
> It's really pretty simple - there is no club initiation to enjoy home
> audio as a hobby. No certification exams, nor any oversight agency
> checking credentials.
That's fine. In that c
andy_c;693883 Wrote:
> What I've noticed is that people who value blind tests know that they
> are difficult to perform correctly, and are therefore unlikely to
> perform such tests on a hypothesis having little merit. And yet one
> reads claims of blind testing of pretty questionable hypotheses,
Wombat;693879 Wrote:
> Of coarse i will :)
>
> But always when i read such luch statements like this:
>
> Closing one eye for a moment on a sighted test is the max i anticipate
> of such a claim.
Then you are being nothing more than an arse. For one thing, I didn't
test to convince you, just m
chill;693843 Wrote:
> Paul - the problem with this is PRECISELY the same as the problem with
> those daft TAS claims. If a file ripped on a PC with a lousy power
> supply is bit-for-bit identical with one ripped from a PC with a better
> power supply, then the power supply made no difference. J
What I've noticed is that people who value blind tests know that they
are difficult to perform correctly, and are therefore unlikely to
perform such tests on a hypothesis having little merit. And yet one
reads claims of blind testing of pretty questionable hypotheses, with
alleged positive results
andy_c;693877 Wrote:
> Stick around man! Sanity is not so easy to find in audiophile forums.
Of coarse i will :)
But always when i read such luch statements like this:
paul.raulerson;693808 Wrote:
> Actually, we set up the tests so that they were blind, in fact as well
> as in principal, and I
Stick around man! Sanity is not so easy to find in audiophile forums.
--
andy_c
andy_c's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3128
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93549
I stated to read around here is not worth but on the other hand you guys
are really a funny crowd sometimes :)
Excuse me if i came across arrogant. You deserve a gold medal for
consistency and nerves of steel!!
--
Wombat
Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA
monobloc
Mnyb;693864 Wrote:
> Which font was used on the newsgroup any serifs would add a peculiar
> edge on stuff :D
I use only monospaced fonts when reading newsgroups, as the uniform
spacing between bytes reduces jitter considerably! :D
--
andy_c
andy_c;693862 Wrote:
> uuencode and base64 sound waaay better than yEnc. :D
Which font was used on the newsgroup any serifs would add a peculiar
edge on stuff :D
--
Mnyb
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621
ralphpnj;693842 Wrote:
>
> 3) I uploaded this flac file to a newsgroup which means that the flac
> file was converted into a yEnc file (a yEnc encoder converts binary
> data, like the data (not music!!!) in a digital audio file, into text)
> and that yEnc file was then split into several smaller
paul.raulerson;693820 Wrote:
> I also have a friend who is convinced that the power supply makes a
> difference when ripping. I have listened to a bit of his stuff, and
> darned if I didn't think I heard a difference. Note - "think" - I am
> NOT convinced I actually did hear a difference. Unlike
paul.raulerson;693820 Wrote:
> Going out on a limb here, but some folks I know claim that emailing a
> file can "change" it and make it sound different. I would normally
> discount that out of hand, but this came from a very noted record
> producer and engineer with her own studio. That gives me
Sounds like Cookie Marenco. Google her for all kinds of audiophile
hilarity.
--
andy_c
andy_c's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3128
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t
darrell;693838 Wrote:
> This is easy to clear up. compare the emailed file (bit for bit) with
> the original. If it is the same, it is the same, and will sound the
> same, regardless of the credentials of those who say otherwise. If it
> is not the same, all bets are off.
>
> The argument from a
paul.raulerson;693820 Wrote:
>
> Going out on a limb here, but some folks I know claim that emailing a
> file can "change" it and make it sound different. I would normally
> discount that out of hand, but this came from a very noted record
> producer and engineer with her own studio. That gives
paul.raulerson;693820 Wrote:
> A friend of mine has a saying he is fond of, and that is that none of
> this is a life or death type of issue - we are not killing babies here.
> He's right.
I've said this before and I'll say it again:
I agree that the grand scheme of things home audio isn't all
Wombat;693829 Wrote:
> At least we now can imagine were your gullibility comes from if you
> correspond with such people.
> :(
Ah, and you make my point about the ugly trolls prowling around the
Internet. I said that the people I was talking with are respectable
enough to make me at least think
paul.raulerson;693820 Wrote:
>
> Going out on a limb here, but some folks I know claim that emailing a
> file can "change" it and make it sound different. I would normally
> discount that out of hand, but this came from a very noted record
> producer and engineer with her own studio. That gives
paul.raulerson;693812 Wrote:
> Pretty much 100% agree Phil. Except of course, a Squeezebox sounds
> better if the LMS is running on Linux or MacOS instead of Windows.
>
> -Paul
>
>
>
> (grin - you realize I am pulling your chain right? :) )
:-) oh yeah... nearly got me!
--
Phil Leigh
totoro;693793 Wrote:
> I'm sorry, but at this point in the argument (ok, discussion :) ) you
> seem to be pretty much ignoring the fact that there is a well
> established literature on the way we humans trick ourselves. There are
> some videos on youtube by Ethan Winer and Poppy Crum illustrating
Pretty much 100% agree Phil. Except of course, a Squeezebox sounds
better if the LMS is running on Linux or MacOS instead of Windows.
-Paul
(grin - you realize I am pulling your chain right? :) )
--
paul.raulerson
mlsstl;693759 Wrote:
> No, it means you're human. Surprise!
>
> However, a husband and wife working together to confirm what the
> husband believes he already hears hardly qualifies as a "blind" test.
> Just another variant of the old "even my wife could hear it!" proof.
You sir, do not know m
paul.raulerson;693754 Wrote:
>
> Here we fundamentally differ. If someone thinks they hear a difference,
> then they do hear a difference. It is just asinine to say the don't, and
> serves no purpose.
>
> Unless that 'someone' is a company or trying to sell you something, or
> trying to come o
paul.raulerson;693754 Wrote:
>
> Perhaps. However, in this thread, just by saying I can hear a
> difference in two USB cables between a particular machine and a
> particular DAC, I have been told I have been brainwashed by a cult. :)
>
>
Not by me, as I hope you noticed :).
--
totoro
sb t
chill;693738 Wrote:
> Have we stopped believing this now? Wow, you stop paying attention for
> 5 minutes...
>
> (Sorry - I agreed with every other word of your post :))
Got me. :) It was late, I somehow switched earth and sun. Sorry about
that, I do this kind of switcheroo in code occasion
DaveWr;693780 Wrote:
> Sorry, forgot about the Kivor, similarly the Cyrus systems. Never saw
> the point of the all-in-one. As you described difficulties of computer
> systems affecting audio, and why put quickly obsolete storage stuff in
> with relatively stable network and audio technology.
Sorry, forgot about the Kivor, similarly the Cyrus systems. Never saw
the point of the all-in-one. As you described difficulties of computer
systems affecting audio, and why put quickly obsolete storage stuff in
with relatively stable network and audio technology.
--
DaveWr
--
DaveWr;693772 Wrote:
> Agree Phil, except the Linn comment is wrong their DS products are
> structurally identical to Squeezethings, all are networked players,
> indeed ethernet only!
Yes - I was thinking about the earlier machines (like the Kivor -
remember those?) - not the modern (DS) ones wh
Agree Phil, except the Linn comment is wrong their DS products are
structurally identical to Squeezethings, all are networked players,
indeed ethernet only!
--
DaveWr
DaveWr's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.
I think we are in danger of losing the plot of this thread here (if it
ever had one?).
Let's seperate 3 things:
1) The TAS article, in particular its claims about wav-flac conversion
being an irreversible, detrimental process. This is what I'm railing
against when I attack them. It is just a pla
paul.raulerson: Wrote:
> I have been told I have been brainwashed by a cult. :)
No, it means you're human. Surprise!
I read your explanation of your home tests and the confidence you
derived from them. That's a great way to make a personal decision
regarding the equipment and accessories you
I've mentioned this book in the past, but a very readable tome on the
subject of human perception is Dr. Cordelia Fine's "A Mind of Its Own:
How Your Brain Distorts & Deceives".
"Expectation bias" is far too limited a term as it implies we can only
be fooled by what we already expect. Things are
totoro;693725 Wrote:
> The programs we are talking about are rippers. If two rippers (of the
> standard sort that the TAS people are talking about, that used standard
> library functions to write data to disc) write out bit-identical files,
> if there are any differences at all due to the locatio
totoro;693725 Wrote:
> People once believed the earth revolved around the sun.
Have we stopped believing this now? Wow, you stop paying attention for
5 minutes...
(Sorry - I agreed with every other word of your post :))
--
chill
--
paul.raulerson;693720 Wrote:
>
>
>
>
> As for a large number of people, well, where there is smoke, you can
> bet some form of combustion is happening. The reasons or explanations
> the give are probably less than accurate, but that something is
> happening is probably pretty likely. Again, Y
paul.raulerson;693720 Wrote:
> Well, not to belabor the point either, but of course it does. If one
> program is a memory player and one is not, it can make all the
> difference in the world.
>
The programs we are talking about are rippers. If two rippers (of the
standard sort that the TAS peop
"
b. for all anyone here knows, I could really be a janitor at a car
fittings company
"
Some of those probably have better bs detectors than many professors .
Positive example as in the latest faster than light discovery at cern ,
the scientist solicited and wanted more eyes on the problem and f
totoro;693717 Wrote:
> Not to belabour the point, but the issue of whether location on disc
> affects sound or whether or not the disc is highly fragmented is NOT
> germane to whether using program 1 or program 2 make the same identical
> file sounds better. You know this as well as I do, I would
paul.raulerson;693713 Wrote:
> Snort!!!
>
> This whole thing is running rampant. I'm a very good software and
> systems engineer, and I have more than a little electronics in my
> background.
>
> (1) I can change a dratted USB cable between my Mac and a high end
> synch USB DAC (a Wavelength P
paulster;693704 Wrote:
> I just wonder if any of the people here who believe that computers
> and/or storage can actually make a difference have any problems using
> ATMs, credit cards or any form of banking that requires computers and
> ethernet connections.
>
> It's got me worried now! ;-)
Sn
I just wonder if any of the people here who believe that computers
and/or storage can actually make a difference have any problems using
ATMs, credit cards or any form of banking that requires computers and
ethernet connections.
It's got me worried now! ;-)
--
paulster
Receiver stuck at blue
darrenyeats;693664 Wrote:
> It's easy for us computer folk to think everyone should understand this
> when they don't.
>
> A file on a computer, as Phil stated, is just numbers. This is the case
> whether the file is a spreadsheet, an audio file or a picture.
>
> Copying a file creates an exact
It's easy for us computer folk to think everyone should understand this
when they don't.
A file on a computer, as Phil stated, is just numbers. This is the case
whether the file is a spreadsheet, an audio file or a picture.
Copying a file creates an exact copy. So you have another file with the
ncarver;693616 Wrote:
> I don't understand "history of the content." By that you mean which one
> came first, etc.?
>
> So let's be more precise and say we have two bit-identical audio/video
> files stored within the same physical filesystem (i.e., same partition)
> on some type of storage devi
ncarver;693616 Wrote:
> I don't understand "history of the content." By that you mean which one
> came first, etc.?
No. Not the history of the files. The history of the content of the
files. Let me illustrate with two hypothetical scenarios. I'll call
them A and B.
Scenario A:
1) You have an u
ncarver;693616 Wrote:
> So let's be more precise and say we have two bit-identical audio/video
> files stored within the same physical filesystem (i.e., same partition)
> on some type of storage device on a computer. You really want to claim
> that it is absolutely impossible for there to be any
TAS copying argument is actually even more silly, they basically imply
that you have to rerip a new WAV file after it has been transcoded to
FLAC and back to WAV and implies that this is an irrecoverable
generational loss which is completely impossible . That no moving
around or defrag or reformat
ncarver;693616 Wrote:
> I don't understand "history of the content." By that you mean which one
> came first, etc.?
>
> So let's be more precise and say we have two bit-identical audio/video
> files stored within the same physical filesystem (i.e., same partition)
> on some type of storage devi
ncarver;693616 Wrote:
>
> So let's be more precise and say we have two bit-identical audio/video
> files stored within the same physical filesystem (i.e., same partition)
> on some type of storage device on a computer. You really want to claim
> that it is absolutely impossible for there to be
With HD playback is is not as you move bits from HD to the player like
S/PDIF during the whole song in a stream.
An average song with 50MB needs 2 seconds of HD access somewhere during
its lets say 4 minutes. Depending on the player this access happens in
the beginning to the buffer or otherwise.
Soulkeeper;693578 Wrote:
> No. But I am saying that if you have two bit-identical files, it is
> impossible for the history of the content of these files to cause them
> to be play differently on any computer. And therefore absolutely no
> effort needs to be wasted to refute such a claim, and tho
bluegaspode;693594 Wrote:
> But ProTools is so expensive that they definitely have cared for the
> problem that the files they record might sound differently based on the
> position of the harddrive where the file is saved.
>
> I think for the same reason ProTools only records in WAV and not FLA
Phil Leigh;693553 Wrote:
> They will simply laugh.
> ProTools anyone?
But ProTools is so expensive that they definitely have cared for the
problem that the files they record might sound differently based on the
position of the harddrive where the file is saved.
I think for the same reason ProTo
Soulkeeper;693578 Wrote:
> No. But I am saying that if you have two bit-identical files, it is
> impossible for the history of the content of these files to cause them
> to be play differently on any computer. And therefore absolutely no
> effort needs to be wasted to refute such a claim, and tho
ncarver;693545 Wrote:
> Just to clarify, are you saying that it is so clearly impossible for two
> bit-identical copies of an audio/video file stored on a computer to play
> differently on that computer, that absolutely no effort needs to be
> wasted to refute such a claim, and those making the c
Phil Leigh;693560 Wrote:
> Which is why some of these "Audio PC" solutions cache the entire track
> in RAM first before playback commences...
>
> But I agree that EVERY event is electrically different froma noise
> perspective.
>
> Which as you imply makes a complete mockerey of the whole thing
darrenyeats;693557 Wrote:
> Computers work through layered, dynamic processes which mean ANY
> playback will be electrically different. In fact, replaying the same
> file a second time is more likely to yield a difference because the
> file is likely to be cached entirely in memory the second tim
Phil Leigh;693553 Wrote:
> It is theoretically possible (but highly unlikely) for two identical
> copies of a file to play back differently if AND ONLY IF:
>
> 1) the hard disk is INSIDE the computer, attached to the motherboard.
> 2) the soundcard with DAC is part of the PC.
>
> and the electr
ncarver;693545 Wrote:
> Of course my post was mainly in jest--perhaps you missed the smiley? I
> thought a sorbothane mouse pad a poor choice to poke fun at audio
> tweeks, since it might actually perform very well for mechanical mice,
> and pads/surfaces can absolutely affect performance of mic
ncarver;693545 Wrote:
>
>
> Just to clarify, are you saying that it is so clearly impossible for
> two bit-identical copies of an audio/video file stored on a computer to
> play differently on that computer, that absolutely no effort needs to be
> wasted to refute such a claim, and those making
Soulkeeper;693482 Wrote:
> No, because what you say isn't impossible. Unlike the claims made about
> bit-perfect file copies sounding worse than the original. Extraordinary
> claims require extraordinary evidence. The audiofool claims are
> extraordinary and without evidence.
Of course my post
Mnyb;693001 Wrote:
> I see the unicorn but somehow it's photons don't stick to film or excite
> the ccd in my camera ?
This just proves that unicorns are vorlons.
--
SuperQ
SuperQ's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com
ncarver;693439 Wrote:
> Of course you "objectivists" can feel free to brand me as a flake since
> I haven't confirmed my observations with double-blind testing or some
> kind of measuring equipment--it just seems obvious: I move the mouse
> and the cursor on screen doesn't move. But maybe this
Phil Leigh;693431 Wrote:
>
> It's only a matter of time before someone "invents" (in every sense of
> the word) a "hi-fi" wi-fi platform, "super audio hard disks" (probably
> SSD's) and devices (magic bricks) that attach to USB and ethernet
> cables.
>
> Perhaps I can interest you all in my sor
1 - 100 of 305 matches
Mail list logo
