RonM wrote:
> It's useful to note, though, that HD Tracks has many tracks available in
> basic CD 16/44 quality. For many recordings that's the only resolution
> available, for others, it's one of several available resolutions.
>
> On numerous occasions I have been able to download in CD qualit
Archimago wrote:
> Thanks for the info guys, that's what I thought... I've said to myself
> many times not to bother with HDTracks until they provide more info on
> where the master comes from or at least provide some kind of review
> section for users/buyers to post their comments (like Amazon
garym wrote:
> If the 24/x files are from the exact same master as the 16/x files,
> there is no benefit to the high res files (other than to the sellers
> removing cash from your bank account). Plenty of evidence from
> rigorously done experiments that people can't detect the difference
> betwe
ralphpnj wrote:
> What?!?!? You mean to say that there is a hi-fi magazine actually worth
> reading. Good to know.
It's the only one I still subscribe to...
Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=
Julf wrote:
> Except for '\"Hi-Fi News (& Record Review)\"'
> (http://www.hifinews.co.uk/) in the UK that not only publishes spectrum
> plots of "hi-res" downloads, but actually points out cases of upsampling
> etc...
What?!?!? You mean to say that there is a hi-fi magazine actually worth
readin
ralphpnj wrote:
> Also don't expect any help to come from the audiophile press since
> HDTracks is smart enough to advertise in all the high end audio
> magazines and to make sure that they carefully wine and dine the editors
> and reviewers of these publications.
Except for '\"Hi-Fi News (& Rec
Archimago wrote:
> Thanks for the info guys, that's what I thought... I've said to myself
> many times not to bother with HDTracks until they provide more info on
> where the master comes from or at least provide some kind of review
> section for users/buyers to post their comments (like Amazon
Thanks for the info guys, that's what I thought... I've said to myself
many times not to bother with HDTracks until they provide more info on
where the master comes from or at least provide some kind of review
section for users/buyers to post their comments (like Amazon and
essentially every repu
garym wrote:
> If the 24/x files are from the exact same master as the 16/x files,
> there is no benefit to the high res files (other than to the sellers
> removing cash from your bank account). Plenty of evidence from
> rigorously done experiments that people can't detect the difference
> betwe
Archimago wrote:
> Hi everyone, I've been wondering this for awhile...
>
> Is there any point in downloading 24-bit hi-res music IF the music is
> already significantly dynamically compressed?
>
> For example, I bought a couple recent HDTracks releases and ran them
> through the DR meter in Foo
Archimago wrote:
> Hi everyone, I've been wondering this for awhile...
>
> Is there any point in downloading 24-bit hi-res music IF the music is
> already significantly dynamically compressed?
>
> For example, I bought a couple recent HDTracks releases and ran them
> through the DR meter in Foo
Hi everyone, I've been wondering this for awhile...
Is there any point in downloading 24-bit hi-res music IF the music is
already significantly dynamically compressed?
For example, I bought a couple recent HDTracks releases and ran them
through the DR meter in Foobar.
Ringo Starr - Ringo 2012 =
12 matches
Mail list logo
