[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-09 Thread tomjtx
SoftwireEngineer;144735 Wrote: > Tom, > You did not tell whether you tried this with your Lavry or the Sonic > Frontiers. I think the Lavry is pretty much immune to jitter from > sources. > I have the Zu Ash and the Sound Professionals Glass toslink. I prefer > the Glass toslink with my SB3. Tho

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-09 Thread SoftwireEngineer
tomjtx;144591 Wrote: > By midnight I prefered the coax over theglass.audio is fun > when it's cheap > > This I will like the the glass again...but I promise not to > post :-) Tom, You did not tell whether you tried this with your Lavry or the Sonic Frontiers. I think the La

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-09 Thread tomjtx
By midnight I prefered the coax over theglass.audio is fun when it's cheap This I will like the the glass again...but I promise not to post :-) -- tomjtx tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.co

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-09 Thread probedb
Deaf Cat;126086 Wrote: > Hiya, > > Anyone spent alot on a digital coax? > > I know they can make a big difference just wondered if anyone out there > had spent more than say 200quid/$ on one? > > What make and why? > > Cheers for any experience shared :) To be fair, unless you can hear the d

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-08 Thread andy_c
I use Toslink for my SB2 digital output, mainly because it goes into a Behringer DEQ 2496. But for those looking for a reasonably-priced solution for 75 Ohm cables with RCA connectors for S/PDIF or analog applications, I wrote up something on this at the link below: http://db.audioasylum.com/cgi

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-08 Thread tomjtx
I have a 300.00 Aural Symphonics coax and a 30.00 glass fiber tosslink feeding a Lavry 10 and a modded Sonic Frontiers DAC. Depending on the words I use to describe the differences one could think I prefer one over the other even though the "words" describe the same listening experience. Glass:"

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-08 Thread notanatheist
Gotta love it when you do a search, find a thread last posted in on August 15th and you ask the CEO!! for a response and he responds in less than 24 hours!! Talk about customer service. Now if only you'd say when that next $100 off two special is so I can equip my garage and workplace with a SB I'

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-08 Thread Craig
dlite;144265 Wrote: > I am not a believer in particularly expensive cables, although a certain > level of quality is desirable in connections and the cable. Quality RGA > Belden RG6 cables for example, terminated well will be nearly as good > as anything on the market regardless of price, but I d

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-08 Thread seraf123
Does it make a material difference if the digital coax being run is 3ft versus say 12ft? i.e any loss in signal quality? -- seraf123 seraf123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7509 View this thread

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-08 Thread opaqueice
dlite;144266 Wrote: > How do you know no bits have been dropped? Or if they are corrupted? It's pretty easy to test more directly - just send out an sp/dif signal from the SB, say run it along a cable you want to test and then record it on the other end using a computer. Now you have two digita

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-08 Thread Skunk
dlite;144266 Wrote: > How do you know no bits have been dropped? Or if they are corrupted? The reasoning is that the AC3 signal would not be decoded properly by the surround receiver if it's not bit for bit. The same goes for HDCD signals being sent to an external DAC. If you use the digital v

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-08 Thread dlite
Craig;144256 Wrote: > As someone who works in the communications industry, I can't believe you > can spend money like that. We routinely send 155MB/S over penny a metre > coax for hundreds of metres and you're worried about spdif over a > metre!! > > Craig I am not a believer in particularly ex

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-08 Thread dlite
richidoo;128794 Wrote: > Yup, blue jeans is the place. Fast delivery, incredible performance, > especially for the price. They have a good article about digital > cables, if I remembner right... > Rich For any Australians reading this our equivalent to Blue Jeans is http://www.htcustomcables.com

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-08 Thread Craig
As someone who works in the communications industry, I can't believe you can spend money like that. We routinely send 155MB/S over penny a metre coax for hundreds of metres and you're worried about spdif over a metre!! Craig -- Craig

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-08 Thread seanadams
notanatheist;144234 Wrote: > Sean, > > Would you mind posting a link to the connectors you use? I'm looking at > rewiring my home theater and doing custom lengths. RG-6 seems it'd work > for audio interconnects and component interconnects. All I'd need then > is to find a 1 ft DVI cable. > > FW

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-07 Thread SoftwireEngineer
I suggest Toslink, Glass Toslinks. Here is an excerpt from my post in another thread. Glass toslinks have surely less jitter. Electrical cables I find are just 'hit and miss' when their impedence matches the output/input impedence of your equipment. In pro business, everything is terminated by a

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-07 Thread SuperQ
notanatheist;144234 Wrote: > Sean, > > Would you mind posting a link to the connectors you use? I'm looking at > rewiring my home theater and doing custom lengths. RG-6 seems it'd work > for audio interconnects and component interconnects. All I'd need then > is to find a 1 ft DVI cable. > > FW

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-10-07 Thread notanatheist
Sean, Would you mind posting a link to the connectors you use? I'm looking at rewiring my home theater and doing custom lengths. RG-6 seems it'd work for audio interconnects and component interconnects. All I'd need then is to find a 1 ft DVI cable. FWIW, I've look at bluejeanscable but I don't

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-08-15 Thread richidoo
Yup, blue jeans is the place. Fast delivery, incredible performance, especially for the price. They have a good article about digital cables, if I remembner right... Rich -- richidoo richidoo's Profile: http://forums.slimd

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-08-15 Thread highdudgeon
Ditto for Blue Jeans Cable. Nice people, cutom product, good, inexpensive materials. It works. -- highdudgeon SB3->Nuforce 9.02->Harbeth Monitor 30s/Skylan stands and Quad ESL-988s. Simple and satisfying. highdudgeon's

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-08-15 Thread consciouspnm
I get mine from www.bluejeanscable.co.uk or www.bluejeanscable.com -- consciouspnm consciouspnm's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5961 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-08-15 Thread Wombat
I simply use a 75 Ohm, 100Hz TV cable. It is of high quality and 3x shielded. -- Wombat Wombat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4113 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-08-15 Thread seanadams
You might want to try a high quality video or RF cable. While it's easy to pass off pretty much anything as an s/pdif cable, for analog video the quality of the cable is much more apparent. Personally I use bulk RG6 and Monster QuickLock connectors for just about everything, including analog aud

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-08-15 Thread GaryG
Check out the Connoisseur range from Coherent-Systems, (http://www.coherent-systems.co.uk/cables_3.asp) I use them for power, digital, analogue and speaker, hard to beat for the money, much better than Nordost Valhalla in my system. Regards Gary -- GaryG ---

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-08-14 Thread PhilNYC
I use an Acoustic Zen Silver Byte cable (about $200) and thought it was all I would ever need. Someone brought over a Virtual Dynamics Nite II digital cable (about $700) and the improvement was shocking. Despite that, I'm still using the AZ cable -- PhilNYC Sonic Spirits Inc. http://www.

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Expensive Digital Coax

2006-08-14 Thread joncourage
Bought a Kimber D-60, but sold it in favor of a much cheaper cable bought on ebay that sounded just as good if not better to me. (If I remember correctly the ebay seller/company was Cable Solutions, and the cable was their top of the line Canare, I believe under $65 or so). -- joncourage SlimS