[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: What happened to the July Stereophile print reveiw of SB3?

2006-07-15 Thread sleepysurf
My "conspiracy theory" post was indeed intended as humor. However, if it doesn't appear in the Sept issue, I definitely think a class-action lawsuit is warranted (again, just kidding) . -- sleepysurf squeezebox2 (with elpac linear psu) to benchmark dac1, direct to sunfire cinema grand 200 ~fi

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: What happened to the July Stereophile print reveiw of SB3?

2006-07-15 Thread seanadams
if you mostly read your news on Teh Interweb, you may be surprised how long the print cycle takes between deciding to review something and actually getting it to the shelves. Sometime three months - and if they're doing extensive audio tests, even longer wouldn't surprise me. I think it's a bit p

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: What happened to the July Stereophile print reveiw of SB3?

2006-07-15 Thread mauidan
"Stereophile is a publication whose income is primarily based on advertisements for the products it reviews. Anyone that believes such a publication is objective has the burden of proof on them, not the other way around." I don't purchase products based on rave reviews, and I don't read the revi

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: What happened to the July Stereophile print reveiw of SB3?

2006-07-15 Thread opaqueice
mauidan Wrote: > > Suggest people have some real proof before making claims of a > conspiracy, kickbacks, or lack of journalistic integrity on a public > forum. > There is something called humor... oh, nevermind. Stereophile is a publication whose income is primarily based on advertisemen

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: What happened to the July Stereophile print reveiw of SB3?

2006-07-15 Thread mauidan
sleepysurf Wrote: > Bummer, just got my Aug Stereophile and NO Squeezebox review... I smell > a conspiracy! sleepysurf- No conspiracy. Your question was answered on the Stereophile forum on 7/13/06: "You can read about John's experience with the Squeezebox here: http://www.stereophile.com/image

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: What happened to the July Stereophile print reveiw of SB3?

2006-07-15 Thread P Floding
dlite Wrote: > Gee's yep, Slim Devices mustn't have wanted to pay for any advertising. > Don't you just love Stereophile. You know they are so unbiased and > filled with journalistic integrity. You may want to try out the British "Hi-Fi World" instead! Better IMHO. Also, not so fixated with ultr

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: What happened to the July Stereophile print reveiw of SB3?

2006-07-14 Thread dlite
Gee's yep, Slim Devices mustn't have wanted to pay for any advertising. Don't you just love Stereophile. You know they are so unbiased and filled with journalistic integrity. -- dlite dlite's Profile: http://forums.slimdev

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: What happened to the July Stereophile print reveiw of SB3?

2006-07-14 Thread Pale Blue Ego
I smell a Sonos kickback :) -- Pale Blue Ego Pale Blue Ego's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=110 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=24954

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: What happened to the July Stereophile print reveiw of SB3?

2006-07-13 Thread sleepysurf
Bummer, just got my Aug Stereophile and NO Squeezebox review... I smell a conspiracy! -- sleepysurf squeezebox2 (with elpac linear psu) to benchmark dac1, direct to sunfire cinema grand 200 ~five (vertically bi-amped) driving ml aerius i's, blue jeans cables. 'click to see my system' (http://

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: What happened to the July Stereophile print reveiw of SB3?

2006-06-24 Thread sleepysurf
I read somewhere that JA mentioned the Stereophile print review had to be pushed back to the upcoming Aug issue. -- sleepysurf squeezebox2 (with elpac linear psu) to benchmark dac1, direct to sunfire cinema grand 200 ~five (vertically bi-amped) driving ml aerius i's, blue jeans cables. 'click