To the OP - I agree with Skunk; if you're running the output of the SB
into a digital preamp, upgrades to the analogue path in the SB are
pretty useless (since you'll almost certainly be better off sending a
digital signal in to the pre).
One other thing to keep in mind is that the cost of thes
totoro;173013 Wrote:
> No, I haven't auditioned bybee filters. The "technical" explanation for
> them is complete garbage. Based on that, I wouldn't even consider them.
> I haven't auditioned magic pebbles, the blood of a black rooster
> sprinkled on the floor, or the magic clock, either.
This i
totoro;173013 Wrote:
> It actually seems to be considered bad form to say anything about any of
> the sponsoring manufacturers on _any_ of the audiocircle fora.
>
> The reverence for pseudo-science and audio mysticism is certainly
> higher there. But belief in the "there are two sides to every
I'll let someone else (rajacat?) make the last response to my last post
and bow out, since we seem to have hijacked this thread. I apologize
for taking part in the hijacking.
--
totoro
squeezebox 3 -> mccormack dna .5 -> audio physic tempo 4
tomjtx;173012 Wrote:
> The AC forum has manufacturers circles as well. On the Bolder forum you
> will of course see a lot of positive remarks about Bolder.
> It should be noted that the moderator (Bolder) can delete posts at will
> and it is considered bad form to say something negative about a
>
rajacat;173009 Wrote:
> Now reallythis is a manufacturers forum which is bound to be
> populated by Slim Devices fanboys whereas AC is an open forum. BTW have
> you ever auditioned Bybee filters or conducted a double blind test. I
> doubt it, so therefore your opinion really does not mean mu
totoro;172992 Wrote:
> Sadly, no. They have many more participants, yes. More objective? Well,
> you think so because more people there agree with you, as far as I can
> see. But objective? I wouldn't say so.
>
> The size of the forum has nothing to do with the mean objectivity of
> the posts.
rajacat;172984 Wrote:
> Bill,
>
> I would suggest that you go to
> http://www.audiocircle.com/circles/index.php?board=46.0 and submit the
> same post. That forum has many more participants so the odds are that
> you will find more useful and objective information.
>
> Raja
Sadly, no. They hav
Bill,
I would suggest that you go to
http://www.audiocircle.com/circles/index.php?board=46.0 and submit the
same post. That forum has many more participants so the odds are that
you will find more useful and objective information.
Raja
--
rajacat
-
Bill,
I have heard a lot of the mods and I can give you my opinion for my
system: Rowland>
Watt/Puppies. These things can be system dependant and personal
preference.
Please note the following is all IMO
The biggest improvement to the SB is the stock elpac PSU. Probably any
decent PSU will give
Like you said if the analog is run through DSP in the pre/pro the
upgrade to the better DAC chip would be useless. Plus it's the same DAC
(i'm guessing) but the 'ke' version. There is even the possibility that
the chip in your Sb performs just as well as a KE.
I would find out if you have true by
11 matches
Mail list logo
