Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter sounding better with clock sync on Toslink, why?

2010-01-31 Thread Kuro
Hi Phil, The clock from 2.2xp is fed into the Toslink input of the TP, not word clock in. I found that using conductive interconnect is noiser than Toslink (optical). Since you have TacT 2.2x and Transporter, how is your connection b/w them? I have everything connected via Toslink, and it soun

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter sounding better with clock sync on Toslink, why?

2010-01-28 Thread Phil Leigh
Kuro;511161 Wrote: > I don't understand why this is the case, as TP is supposed to have a > better clock inside. And usually, having the clock as close to the > source as possible (ie: using TP's internal clock) should make for a > better sounding system. > > If sync'ing to ext. clock via tosli

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter sounding better with clock sync on Toslink, why?

2010-01-28 Thread Kuro
I've a TacT 2.2xp digital preamp and I found that if I feed the subwoofer toslink output from 2.2xp to the toslink input of the Transporter (TP) and tell TP to sync its clock on the toslink input, the sound is noticeably better. I don't understand why this is the case, as TP is supposed to have a