JezA;486606 Wrote:
> Why should the louder one be perceived as better?
>
> If someone plays the violin badly, I would prefer them to play quieter.
> (Ideally silently).
>
> Would I prefer JBLs driven by a terrible amplifier played really loud
> to QUAD electrostatics driven by a decent valve am
JezA wrote:
> Why should the louder one be perceived as better?
>
> If someone plays the violin badly, I would prefer them to play quieter.
> (Ideally silently).
You are confusing separate issues. The performance standard of a
musician is a completely different subject from the perceived quality
JezA wrote:
> Why should the louder one be perceived as better?
Its well established, scientific tests and all that. Humans are very
good at detecting louder signals, but they are very bad at detecting
that the reason they prefer one over another is just the loudness.
Probably comes from the need
Why should the louder one be perceived as better?
If someone plays the violin badly, I would prefer them to play quieter.
(Ideally silently).
--
JezA
JezA's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=21219
V
:rofl:
--
ghostrider
ghostrider's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18959
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=60169
___
audio
kphinney;484737 Wrote:
> I never said price = performance, but it just so happens that FLAC, WAV,
> and ALAC rips sound less pleasing, less full, and a mere shadow of a
> sound stage when played thru my $1600 TP as compared to my CD Transport
> and DAC that pair up well for a hefty price. The so
It is impossible to A/B compare two hifi components close enough
(souces, amplifiers, cables, etc) which have a 1dB (or sometimes less)
difference. The louder one is always considered as "more open", "more
detailed" etc.
I made the experiment with twice the _same_ component. The 1dB louder
is alw
JezA;486304 Wrote:
> Do you need to level match two pianists to make a judgement about their
> ability?
>
Pianist? No. Piano? I would say Yes.
You're judging different things, if you can't see that...well.
--
radish
'HELP ME RAISE MONEY FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH!'
(HTTP://WWW.ADAMREE
cunobeli...@mac.com wrote:
> This is getting to look very much like arguing for ego rather than truth,
> otherwise known as trolling.
+1
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audio
JezA;486304 Wrote:
> Do you need to level match two pianists to make a judgement about their
> ability?
>
> Do you have to sit in the same seat in a concert hall to judge two
> performances?
>
> Will sitting close to a bad violinist make them sound better than
> sitting further away from a good
This is getting to look very much like arguing for ego rather than truth,
otherwise known as trolling. If it were not, there would be no need to start
reaching for such patently - and ludicrously - false analogies and .
Does it really need to be said that the closer one is to a musician, the mor
JezA;486304 Wrote:
>
> Will sitting close to a bad violinist make them sound better than
> sitting further away from a good one?
No, but standing closer to a violinist having a very slightly bad day
may sound better than staying further away from the same violinist on a
different day.
I think
Do you need to level match two pianists to make a judgement about their
ability?
Do you have to sit in the same seat in a concert hall to judge two
performances?
Will sitting close to a bad violinist make them sound better than
sitting further away from a good one?
--
JezA
---
kphinney;486089 Wrote:
> Yet you still insist that I can't make a valid judgment without an SPL?
> I prefer to go with what my ears want, not engineers from Linn or MD PhD
> BA and Total BS self proclaimed experts whom have never sat in my
> chair.
>
> Tom for President!!! He's magic and knows
JezA;486200 Wrote:
> tomjtx .. I can't find any reference to or use of the "PRAT" - pace,
> rhythm and timing - phrase on the Linn website or in any of their
> marketing material. I think this was a phrase that some hifi journalists
> invented some years ago, and is more commonly associated with
JezA;486200 Wrote:
> tomjtx .. I can't find any reference to or use of the "PRAT" - pace,
> rhythm and timing - phrase on the Linn website or in any of their
> marketing material. I think this was a phrase that some hifi journalists
> invented some years ago, and is more commonly associated with
tomjtx .. I can't find any reference to or use of the "PRAT" - pace,
rhythm and timing - phrase on the Linn website or in any of their
marketing material. I think this was a phrase that some hifi journalists
invented some years ago, and is more commonly associated with NAIM
equipment.
--
JezA
-
kphinney;486089 Wrote:
> Yet you still insist that I can't make a valid judgment without an SPL?
> I prefer to go with what my ears want, not engineers from Linn or MD PhD
> BA and Total BS self proclaimed experts whom have never sat in my
> chair.
>
> Tom for President!!! He's magic and knows
tomjtx;486086 Wrote:
> The recording engineers aren't necessarily the one's that came up with
> that silly PRAT terminology.
> Besides, they are engineers, not musicians.
>
> I have been a[ yadda yadda yadda...] As a trained musician I find
> myself feeling embarased for the Linn "engineers
JezA;485941 Wrote:
> tomjtx, the Linn engineers who you call "musically illiterate" include
> guys who have made award winning classical music and jazz recordings.
>
> Why don't you get your facts right before you hurl abuse?
>
> What recordings have you made, that we may judge your competence
JezA;485941 Wrote:
> tomjtx, the Linn engineers who you call "musically illiterate" include
> guys who have made award winning classical music and jazz recordings.
> ...
>
> What other top-end hi-fi company has made such a large body of high
> quality recordings?
This is all very true. Neverthel
tomjtx, the Linn engineers who you call "musically illiterate" include
guys who have made award winning classical music and jazz recordings.
Why don't you get your facts right before you hurl abuse?
What recordings have you made, that we may judge your competence from?
--
JezA
---
kphinney;485735 Wrote:
> Apparently you are right. Maybe we should have an insult forum also.
>
> Thanks for the input Phil. I'm going to see if I can arrange an
> in-home for the Klimax and Akurate DSs. In the show room I agree the
> Klimax DS is superior, but I'm not sure if my system has
Well I've just agreed to buy a Linn Akurate DS, my first ever Linn
product. I'm hoping to do a comparison of the Linn, Transporter, SB+
and possibly the Modwright Transporter too, which would be fun.
--
adamslim
You can't have too much music, but I do have too much hifi
SB+, Audion Pre, 6B4G
Phil Leigh;485685 Wrote:
> I think you may have accidentally logged-on to the wrong forum.
>
> Given that Linn has been going since 1972, I know which way I'd bet my
> money.
> The Linn Klimax DS is the best DS I've heard yet by a country mile IMO.
> It's just very, very expensive...
Apparently
kphinney;485396 Wrote:
> Stay on topic and there wouldn't be any issue.
I think you may have accidentally logged-on to the wrong forum.
Given that Linn has been going since 1972, I know which way I'd bet my
money.
The Linn Klimax DS is the best DS I've heard yet by a country mile IMO.
It's ju
kphinney wrote:
> To bring it fully around to my original question: My Rotel and Linn
> gear from the 70's are still supported by the manufacturer and still
> sound great. In You Opinion will the TP sound and support live a full
> 40 years into the future?
Not a prayer of a chance. My Nikon F ca
kphinney;485396 Wrote:
> Stay on topic and there wouldn't be any issue. I think it's more likely
> that CliveB, who was correcting the nomenclature I used to described my
> observations, was actually trying to get to the route of the issue and
> that is much appreciated.
>
> Unlike CliveB, your
audiomuze;485344 Wrote:
> Careful CliveB, apparently disagreeing with kphinney constitutes an OT
> post.
Stay on topic and there wouldn't be any issue. I think it's more
likely that CliveB, who was correcting the nomenclature I used to
described my observations, was actually trying to get to th
audiomuze;485344 Wrote:
> Careful CliveB, apparently disagreeing with kphinney constitutes an OT
> post.
lol ^^
--
Themis
SB3 - North Star dac 192 - Cyrus 8xp - Sonus Faber Grand Piano Domus
Themis's Profile: http://foru
cliveb;484916 Wrote:
> Be careful using words like "corrected".Careful CliveB, apparently
> disagreeing with kphinney constitutes an OT
post.
--
audiomuze
audiomuze's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?use
kphinney;484806 Wrote:
> The TP without DAC offers a much reduced soundstage and an analytical
> sound that is mostly corrected with a tube amp and tube pre.
Be careful using words like "corrected". You're implying that there's
something wrong with the analogue signal from the TP which after bein
Themis;484697 Wrote:
> An alternative seems to be PS Audio : http://www.psaudio.com/
I have the PS audio Perfect wave dac in my system , the so called
"bridge" is still vapourware and will not replace a SB/TP it also wont
have a decent interface unless you own an Iphone or something...it's
IMHO
loserica;484801 Wrote:
> How does the TP compare as a transport to your CD transport ? Are you
> using it via coax or aes/ebu ?
> Thanks
The TP without DAC offers a much reduced soundstage and an analytical
sound that is mostly corrected with a tube amp and tube pre.
The TP with DAC is amazing
kphinney;484737 Wrote:
>
>
> I never said price = performance, but it just so happens that FLAC,
> WAV, and ALAC rips sound less pleasing, less full, and a mere shadow of
> a sound stage when played thru my $1600 TP as compared to my CD
> Transport and DAC that pair up well for a hefty price.
Phil Leigh;484732 Wrote:
> Guess I must be weird then? :-):D
Back to topic, I guess it won't be long before most of the established
firms making transports get into media streaming. At the moment, they
just add this as an "option" to other products (like my Denon AV amp,
for instance) but it wo
audiomuze;484677 Wrote:
> So price = performance in the audiophile world :D. Keep chasing that
> rainbow, clearly it gives you something to do :)
Are you purposely acting ignorant and non-helpful or should I read
deeper into your messages to find the hidden on-topic points?
I never said price
Themis;484636 Wrote:
> In any case, usually people who buy Linn wouldn't buy something else.
> And (it seems) people who buy other gear don't buy Linn, most probably
> because of the quality/price ratio. ;)
>
> So, you mean perhaps "what are the alternatives to the Majik DS" ? :D
Guess I must b
An alternative seems to be PS Audio : http://www.psaudio.com/
--
Themis
SB3 - North Star dac 192 - Cyrus 8xp - Sonus Faber Grand Piano Domus
Themis's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14700
View thi
kphinney;484605 Wrote:
> Personally, (in my opinion only) I think the TP is very, very light. I
> also think it is the least expensive piece of my gear except for a few
> of my cables and while it does sound good to me, it is the weakest link
> in my system.
>
> That brings us back to the point
In any case, usually people who buy Linn wouldn't buy something else.
And (it seems) people who buy other gear don't buy Linn, most probably
because of the quality/price ratio. ;)
So, you mean perhaps "what are the alternatives to the Majik DS" ? :D
--
Themis
SB3 - North Star dac 192 - Cyrus
empty99;484465 Wrote:
> Here's hoping that the healthy "open-source" forums like ours to come up
> with solutions for the TP when Logitech no longer support it. I am still
> holding out for a $900 unit (to replace my SB3+MFA3.24DAC) ;^)
It would be nice to compile a list of other streaming trans
kphinney;484428 Wrote:
> Totally agree. Although I liked my rechargeable $300 Harmony much more
> than the AAA sucking flimsy $99 one they sent me as a replacement. My
> point being, will they replace a broken TP with a NPR-in-the-kitchen
> worthy Squeeze Radio?
Here's hoping that the healthy
kphinney;484429 Wrote:
> Good to hear - I enjoy mine very much also, but the price of a TP + a
> worthy DAC can get you in to a few other higher end streaming
> transports, no?
With all due respect, unless your listening environment is optimally
configured, you're chasing a rainbow. Even if it'
dennis55;483447 Wrote:
>
> almost two years on, i still enjoy my Transporter whatever "border" you
> chose.;)
>
> dennis
Good to hear - I enjoy mine very much also, but the price of a TP + a
worthy DAC can get you in to a few other higher end streaming
transports, no?
--
kphinney
-I like i
empty99;483409 Wrote:
> I liked my Harmony remote w/ its smart downloadable programing tricks
> for all my gears but disliked the buttons size and arrangement on it.
Totally agree. Although I liked my rechargeable $300 Harmony much more
than the AAA sucking flimsy $99 one they sent me as a repl
kphinney "In fact, the TP is borderline audiophile quality."
almost two years on, i still enjoy my Transporter whatever "border" you
chose.;)
dennis
--
dennis55
Slim Devices/Logitech Transporter
Bonnec Audiosysteme Timpano
Linn Products Akurate C4200
Totem Acoustics Forest
SqueezeBox Radio
D
I liked my Harmony remote w/ its smart downloadable programing tricks
for all my gears but disliked the buttons size and arrangement on it.
--
empty99
empty99's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3488
I haven't seen any announcement from Logitech that the Transporter or
support for it has or will be withdrawn. Just more internet drivel.
:rolleyes: Of course if you feel the need to spend more money..feel
free!
--
ghostrider
-
JezA;483039 Wrote:
> Logitech are now claiming that the Touch has "audiophile acoustics".
> Draw your own conclusions!
>
> http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/speakers_audio/wireless_music_systems/&cl=gb,en
Well, it is better than an unmodified SB3, but both require an outboard
DAC for anything
Logitech are now claiming that the Touch has "audiophile acoustics".
Draw your own conclusions!
http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/speakers_audio/wireless_music_systems/&cl=gb,en
--
JezA
JezA's Profile: http://forums.slim
Does anyone have more recent experience with the TP vs. Majik DS? It's
upgrade time and I'm not thrilled with the likely prospect of the
Transporter being discontinued (or supported by a co. known for their
Mice and Webcams). I don't want to be left in the cold if/when it's
time for support, but
cliveb;412612 Wrote:
> That must explain why my telephone (400Hz - 1000Hz) sounds so fabulous
> :-)
I didn't invent this rule and I'm sure the sound is equilibrate with
400-1000 , try some weird combination like 40-1000 or 400-1 on your
phone and report the result ;-)
--
krzys
--
I've upgraded my rig so it only plays 632.455Hz sine waves - stunning!
--
Muggy
Muggy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2258
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=60169
cliveb;412612 Wrote:
> That must explain why my telephone (400Hz - 1000Hz) sounds so fabulous
> :-)
Hear hear !
--
PBA
Transporter - Dual Connect - Thorhauge Audio Tube I. 270 - Dual Connect
- modded Magnepan
PBA's Prof
krzys;412527 Wrote:
> Same observation for me Phil, better highs make better bass. I explain
> it to myself by the 400 000 law: the lowest frequency multiplied by the
> highest one should give 400 000 in order to give well equilibrate sound.
> For example 20Hz * 20 000 Hz = 400 000 ;-)
> Chris
Th
Phil Leigh;412499 Wrote:
>
> I can hear the (effects of the) supertweeters. They make the bass sound
> better to me (I don't understand why).
> :)
Same observation for me Phil, better highs make better bass. I explain
it to myself by the 400 000 law: the lowest frequency multiplied by the
high
Patrick Dixon;412349 Wrote:
> Phil, you have super tweeters and you don't think transports can make
> any difference?
>
> ;-)
Yes and Yes.
I can hear the (effects of the) supertweeters. They make the bass sound
better to me (I don't understand why). They kick in quite low (17k I
think). I can
Phil, you have super tweeters and you don't think transports can make
any difference?
;-)
--
Patrick Dixon
www.at-tunes.co.uk
Patrick Dixon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=90
View this thread:
browellm;411744 Wrote:
> I fixed your quote ;-)
>
> In all seriousness, I am sure there are many, many merits to the Linn
> sound. I haven't auditioned them, but if I liked the Linn house sound
> wouldn't I be better using a TP as transport for greater overall
> flexibility and ease of use, cou
browellm;411744 Wrote:
> I fixed your quote ;-)
>
> In all seriousness, I am sure there are many, many merits to the Linn
> sound. I haven't auditioned them, but if I liked the Linn house sound
> wouldn't I be better using a TP as transport for greater overall
> flexibility and ease of use, cou
WhatsNext;411575 Wrote:
> I have done the AB thing on TP vs DS and I found that the Sneaky and
> Majik were more musical than the TP. If you read the marketeers
> comments on the Linn Forum they will tell you that they use Tune Dem
> when they marketeer their products. They first go for maximum
Phil Leigh;400666 Wrote:
> Guys - guys - calm down. All DAC's are "voiced" to some extent otherwise
> they would sound dangerously similar. I'm very familiar with Linn gear.
> It has a "house sound" that you either love or hate - most folks aren't
> neutral about this. I like it. I'd generally ne
It's nice to see everyone getting along so well.
--
tomjtx
tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=60169
Patrick Dixon;400607 Wrote:
> In theory yes, but in practice they're measured in quite different ways
> and can give different results.
So then what was the point of your question?
>
> My mistake. I assumed that when talking with such authority, you would
> at least have had some facts to bas
A NAIM DAC isn't far away either ..
http://forums.naim-audio.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/8772903417/m/4852964817
--
JezA
JezA's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=21219
View this thread: http://forums.sli
Guys - guys - calm down. All DAC's are "voiced" to some extent otherwise
they would sound dangerously similar. I'm very familiar with Linn gear.
It has a "house sound" that you either love or hate - most folks aren't
neutral about this. I like it. I'd generally never describe Linn DIGITAL
gear as
opaqueice;400034 Wrote:
> What about it? The complex frequency response is precisely equivalent
> to the impulse responseIn theory yes, but in practice they're measured in
> quite different ways
and can give different results.
opaqueice;400034 Wrote:
>
> Where did I say I measured them?
My
sebbe_sabb;399844 Wrote:
> +MajikDS & IpodTouch+PlugPlayer is a ok interface that do display
> albumart when album plays (not when browsing)
> /sebbe
Have a look at Songbook:
http://bookshelfapps.com/songbook.php
--
spoon
Spoon-www.dbpoweramp.com
Patrick Dixon;399734 Wrote:
> So what about the impulse response?
What about it? The complex frequency response is precisely equivalent
to the impulse response, and the phase is irrelevant (unless it's
-extremely- far from linear).
> And how exactly did you measure the frequency response of th
DaveWr;399740 Wrote:
> Well here is John Atkinson Measurements (Copyright Stereophile)
>
> I agree with Patrick, I think that a lot of variation in audio
> presentation is due to transient / phase effects.
>
> Dave
Certainly there isn't much in these measurements, I think we can all
agree on th
sebbe ,
did you level match using a SPL ?
That can make a big difference.
It would be interesting to see if you hear a diff. level matched and
blind.
--
tomjtx
tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?
I am with you, I posted the images to show what a respected measurement
guy gets. This is not the whole story. Ears still seem best. People
for decades have looked at measurements - some definitely indicate
weaknesses that will be heard, but you still seem to get different
perceptions of music
I would love to understand the previous images, nut have no clue. Im
just a mech. engineer who learnt to trust my ears when buying audio.
I did a recompare the Transporter to the MajikDS this weekend, just to
refresh my memory. I did have different signal cables (linn black in
transporter, linn s
The two variants are for the Linn Majik CD Player - with and without
pre-emphasis.
Load does make a difference in some cases. These were all 100K.
Atkinson found some significant variations in other player as the load
was reduced, postulated caused by output capacitor.
Dave
--
DaveWr
--
DaveWr;399740 Wrote:
> Well here is John Atkinson Measurements (Copyright Stereophile)
>
> I agree with Patrick, I think that a lot of variation in audio
> presentation is due to transient / phase effects.
>
> Dave
Hmm, well difficult to compare since one is to a different scale and
one seems
Well here is John Atkinson Measurements (Copyright Stereophile)
I agree with Patrick, I think that a lot of variation in audio
presentation is due to transient / phase effects.
Dave
+---+
|Filename: 906SB3FIG1.jpg
opaqueice;399548 Wrote:
> Because any high-end digital source will have a flat frequency response
> down to below the threshold of audibility.So what about the impulse response?
And how exactly did you measure the frequency response of the Linn DS
kit and the Transporter?
--
Patrick Dixon
ww
Sorry, but I agree with Mr Sukebe about differences,
I was in the market 7 years ago for a new CD player. I spent several
hours in my local dealers listening room. Equipment under review Cyrs,
Naim, Linn and Tag McLaren (just before they disappeared.
All equipment was used with same amplifier,
Mr_Sukebe;399586 Wrote:
> I've got to ask, how many "high-end" digital sources have you listened
> to?
More than I can count.
> The ones that I've heard over the years generally sounded quite
> different in their presentations, which would seem to contradict your
> statement a little.
Not at
Well, if i read that right opaqueice more or less says that all serious
sources present the perceived bass equal cause the frequency response
is equal.
So all this different sounding is just a mass-hysteria lasting more
than 20 years! Since then most serious devices already had a real flat
frequen
opaqueice;399548 Wrote:
> Because any high-end digital source will have a flat frequency response
> down to below the threshold of audibility, while on the other hand your
> brain (and speakers and room) has an enormous effect on your perception
> of the amount of bass. Unless one of them is bro
JezA;399489 Wrote:
> Yes, Why is it at all absurd?
Because any high-end digital source will have a flat frequency response
down to below the threshold of audibility, while on the other hand your
brain (and speakers and room) has an enormous effect on your perception
of the amount of bass. Unles
Any decent digital source will have incredible bass extension, flat
response and low distortion in comparison to even the most
sophisticated loudspeakers. I don't know of any loudspeakers that are
anywhere near flat down to 5Hz - and if they exist certainly they will
add major problems with group
opaqueice;398750 Wrote:
> The idea that the Linn could have "more bass" than the Transporter is
> absurd.
>
> Try a blind test.
Yes, Why is it at all absurd?
--
JezA
JezA's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member
opaqueice;398750 Wrote:
> The idea that the Linn could have "more bass" than the Transporter is
> absurd.
>
> Why?
[padding ...]
--
Patrick Dixon
www.at-tunes.co.uk
Patrick Dixon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevic
Not all blind testing is ABX. And not all ABX uses short snippets.
Every listening method has problems. Some people are laughably lax when
it comes to their sighted listening methodology and then turn suddenly
into forensic lawyers when discussing blind methodology. AKA Cognitive
Dissonance.
Darr
browellm;398752 Wrote:
> It does make me laugh when people blithely accept ABX blind testing as
> the _only_ way to critically evaluate audio components.
>
> In what sense is an ABX test anywhere near approaching the way we
> listen to music for pleasure? Listening to 30 second snippets of music
tomjtx;398733 Wrote:
> If you mean intellectually deaf I quite agree :-)
>
> IMO people are being intellectually dishonest with themselves if they
> refuse to do a blind test.
>
> Did you compare the dacs blind ?
It does make me laugh when people blithely accept ABX blind testing as
the _only_
sebbe_sabb;397532 Wrote:
>
> Sound differences?
> Clearly more bass, more PRAT and so on on the Linn. Call me biased
> (since I own other Linn equipments) but the DS owns the Transporter
> soundwise but the server solution & usability is much better on the
> Transporter.
The idea that the Linn
Manelus;398693 Wrote:
> It can be surprising how "differences" vanish when the listening is done
> deaf :)
If you mean intellectually deaf I quite agree :-)
IMO people are being intellectually dishonest with themselves if they
refuse to do a blind test.
Did you compare the dacs blind ?
--
tomjtx;398669 Wrote:
> It can be surprising how "differences" vanish when the listening is done
> blind.
It can be surprising how "differences" vanish when the listening is
done deaf :)
--
Manelus
Manelus's Profile: http
Manelus;398648 Wrote:
> Magik is not better
> Akurate is different, not better.
> Klimax is better.
> (Tested at home, all day long)
I suspect in a DBT you would be unable to identify a difference in any
of those products, let alone assign a SQ judgement.
It can be surprising how "differences"
Magik is not better
Akurate is different, not better.
Klimax is better.
(Tested at home, all day long)
--
Manelus
Manelus's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8289
View this thread: http://forums.sli
I have compared Transporter to both those Linn products and I don't
think either one sounds better.
You have to level match and do blind AB comparos( which I did) to make
any meaningful judgement.
People have a tendency to hear more expensive gear as being better,
that's where blind listening com
Mr_Sukebe;397568 Wrote:
> There are comments on both HifiWigwam and Pinkfish comparing the two. I
> don't consider either forum to be particularly pro either product.
Thanks Mr S. I don't remember reading any comparisons on HiFiWigwam,
but will have a look at PF to see what the conclusions are
browellm;397527 Wrote:
> Would this be on the Linn forums? It would help you you could reference
> the source.
There are comments on both HifiWigwam and Pinkfish comparing the two.
I don't consider either forum to be particularly pro either product.
--
Mr_Sukebe
SB+, Bel Canto Evo2i, Impul
I own both a Transporter and a Majik DS. They sound very different with
the DS being clearly the better music plyer.
The GUI on the Linn do suck. You have to buy a Iphone/Ipodtouch & use a
twonky control point software (plugplayer) to make it as usable (almost)
as the Transporters Squeezecenter.
A
Mr_Sukebe;397446 Wrote:
> Just read some comments elsewhere by people who've run direct
> comparisons between the various DS products and the transporter. In
> short, the people in question preferred every one of the DS range to
> the Tranporter, even the cheapest Sneaky, so I'd expect the Majik
No licensing needed, Linn could have decided to make their stuff SB
compatible based on open specs but clearly decided not to.
--
radish
radish's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=77
View this thread
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
