garym;620376 Wrote:
> I wonder if we could borrow a few moderators from hydrogenaudio.org for
> a while. Where's greynol when you need him.
been spending some time over there as well! Good folks!
--
earwaxer9
System: modified Winsome Labs Mouse, modified Maggie MMG's, Transporter,
HSU su
I wonder if we could borrow a few moderators from hydrogenaudio.org for
a while. Where's greynol when you need him.
--
garym
garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325
View this thread: http
darrenyeats;620151 Wrote:
> Hi earwaxer9,
> Are you comparing the same music files but down-sampled properly to
> 16/44.1? If not, the difference may be due to mastering.
>
> Regards, Darren
Hi Darren - I havent experimented with downsampled 24/96 to 16/44.1.
What I have been messing with is so
earwaxer9;620060 Wrote:
> I have been enjoying my 24/96 now for some time. Either native or
> upsampled. I find it to be much more enjoyable than the 16/44.1.
> Richer, more realistic. Not sure what can be credited. The sample rate
> or the frequency. I suspect the frequency has a larger role, al
earwaxer9;620060 Wrote:
> I have been enjoying my 24/96 now for some time. Either native or
> upsampled. I find it to be much more enjoyable than the 16/44.1.
> Richer, more realistic. Not sure what can be credited. The sample rate
> or the frequency. I suspect the frequency has a larger role, al
I have been enjoying my 24/96 now for some time. Either native or
upsampled. I find it to be much more enjoyable than the 16/44.1.
Richer, more realistic. Not sure what can be credited. The sample rate
or the frequency. I suspect the frequency has a larger role, although I
havent tested it. I thin
