Andrew L.Weekes wrote:
-However, the thing about an opto/mechanical (CD) transport is that you
have to deal with how well the, uh, transport itself is working - and
that's a real-world error-prone process involving light, motors, and
quite fragile media. I have several real-life, perfectly reprod
Malcolm Wotton wrote:
So in summary, the digital (network) link between the PC and SB2 and the
digital link from SB2 to DAC both suffer from jitter, however in the PC/SB2
link the network speed and protocols allow errors to be identified and
corrected. The approach taken for identifying and corre
Aylwin wrote:
> I would be willing to accept Mike's -"good enough"- but I have trouble
> with -"it's only a matter of having no errors"-. However, I think one
> key point from the definition above is, -"The amount of allowable
> jitter depends greatly on the application"-.
I agree, and possibly
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 17:43 -0700, kronos wrote:
> earthbased Wrote:
> > Get a Kuro Box. It uses 17W power and is very quiet.
> thanks for the tip Dan, do i take your reply as a NO to my 1 - question
I'm not Dan, but part of the confusion may be that you asked if you
need "a PC" and the answer i
Robin Bowes wrote:
To right. The thought of all those hundreds of hours... ugh! $200 for a
Ooops, call me pedantic but I did of course mean "Too right".
R.
--
http://robinbowes.com
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http:
Pat Farrell wrote:
I think your approach is fine. I dispense with the backup
disk, and consider my 800+ CDs as backup.
But I would rather not have to reextract and recompress them
To right. The thought of all those hundreds of hours... ugh! $200 for a
back up disk sounds cheap at twice the pri
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 10:58 -0700, rich spengel wrote:
>
> I have some thoughts on music storage. I am ripping my collection to
> FLAC at minimum compression, and it is clear that
> about 1000 albums will fit on my 300GB ($150) hard drive.
A minor nit, the flac compression control is for control
